BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2675
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 2, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
Sandre Swanson, Chair
AB 2675 (Labor Committee) - As Amended: April 16, 2012
SUBJECT : Public works: prevailing wage rates: penalty
assessment.
SUMMARY : Clarifies that portions of payments withheld to
satisfy civil wage and penalty assessments are deemed forfeited
upon receipt of a final order that is no longer subject to
judicial review.
EXISTING LAW:
1)Specifies that, before making payments to the contractor of
money due under a contract for public work, the awarding body
shall withhold and retain therefrom all amounts required to
satisfy any civil wage and penalty assessment issued by the
Labor Commissioner under existing law.
2)Provides that the amounts required to satisfy a civil wage and
penalty assessment shall not be disbursed by the awarding body
until receipt of a final order that is no longer subject to
judicial review.
3)Provides that if the awarding body has not retained sufficient
money under the contract to satisfy a civil wage and penalty
assessment based on a subcontractor's violations, the
contractor shall, upon the request of the Labor Commissioner,
withhold sufficient money due the subcontractor under the
contract to satisfy the assessment and transfer the money to
the awarding body. These amounts shall not be disbursed by the
awarding body until receipt of a final order that is no longer
subject to judicial review.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown
COMMENTS : This bill makes a technical change to current law
which was brought to the Committee's attention through
discussions with the Department of Industrial Relations.
Current Labor Code Section 1727 is entitled, "Withholding
payment of amounts forfeited." The existing law requires
AB 2675
Page 2
awarding bodies and contractors to withhold from specified
payments amounts necessary to satisfy civil wage and hour
penalties issued by the Labor Commissioner. The final outcome
is resolved when there is a final order that is no longer
subject to judicial review. However, despite the fact that the
title to Labor Code Section 1727 states "forfeited," the actual
text of the law does not refer to these amounts as "forfeited."
The courts have previously characterized the amounts withheld or
retained under Section 1727 as a "forfeiture." (J & K Painting
Co. v. Bradshaw (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1394, 1404-1405).
Therefore, to avoid any potential confusion, this bill simply
clarifies that once there is a final order that is no longer
subject to judicial review, these amounts withheld are indeed
deemed forfeited.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
None on file.
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by : Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091