BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                             SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
                             Senator Noreen Evans, Chair
                              2011-2012 Regular Session

          AB 2690 (Committee on Judiciary)
          As Amended  April 23, 2012
          Hearing Date: July 3, 2012
          Fiscal: No
          Urgency: No
          LSF/SK
                    

                                        SUBJECT
                                           
                               Civil Law: Tort Claims

                                      DESCRIPTION  

          This bill, sponsored by the California Law Revision Commission 
          (CLRC), would adopt "Government Claims Act" as the short title 
          for Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) of the 
          Government Code, and replace the reference "Tort Claims Act" 
          with "Government Claims Act" throughout the codes. 

                                      BACKGROUND

           Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) of Title 1 of the 
          Government Code (Division 3.6), titled "Claims and Actions 
          Against Public Employees," specifies the rules of civil 
          liability that apply to public entities and public employees in 
          California.  This division was added to the code in 1963 after 
          the Legislature assigned CLRC the task of developing a unified 
          and comprehensive statute on governmental liability and 
          immunity.  

          Over time, Division 3.6 has been commonly referred to in the 
          courts and the codes as the "Tort Claims Act." The term is used 
          in six different California code sections: the Civil Code, Code 
          of Civil Procedure, Education Code, Government Code, and Penal 
          Code. However, the term "Tort Claims Act" is a misnomer, as the 
          act is not limited to tort claims but also encompasses certain 
          contract matters. 

          In City of Stockton v. Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 730 (2007), 
          the California Supreme Court adopted the practice of referring 
          to Division 3.6 as the "Government Claims Act" to avoid the 
                                                                (more)



          AB 2690 (Committee on Judiciary)
          Page 2 of ?



          confusion caused by the term "Tort Claims Act." Consistent with 
          this practice by the Court, CLRC recommends replacing all 
          references to the "Tort Claims Act" with "Government Claims Act" 
          throughout the codes, as well as adopting the short title 
          "Government Claims Act" for Division 3.6. 


                                CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW
           
           Existing law  creates the California Law Revision Commission. 
          (Gov. Code Sec. 8280.)
           
          Existing law  authorizes the California Law Revision Commission 
          to study and recommend revisions to correct technical or minor 
          substantive defects in the statutes without a prior concurrent 
          resolution of the Legislature referring the matter to the 
          commission for study. (Gov. Code Sec. 8289.)

           Existing law  specifies rules of civil liability that apply to 
          public entities and public employees in California. (Gov. Code 
          Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Sec. 810.))

           This bill  would adopt "Government Claims Act" as the short title 
          for Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) of the 
          Government Code.  

          This bill  would replace references to the California "Tort 
          Claims Act" with references to the California "Government Claims 
          Act" throughout the codes.  

                                        COMMENT
           
           1.Stated need for the bill

           According to CLRC, adopting the short title "Government Claims 
          Act" for Division 3.6, and likewise conforming the codes will 
          help prevent confusion and endure consistency with the 
          California Supreme Court's holding on the matter.  CLRC states 
          these changes will ultimately conserve both judicial and 
          litigant resources. 
           
          2.Revision to Eliminate Confusion 

           In applying Division 3.6, the common use of the term "Tort 
          Claims Act" has caused some confusion for litigants who assumed, 
          based on that misnomer, that the division is limited only to 
                                                                      



          AB 2690 (Committee on Judiciary)
          Page 3 of ?



          tort claims. In fact, courts have repeatedly found that some 
          provisions of Division 3.6 also apply to certain contract 
          matters.

          In City of Stockton v. Superior Court, the California Supreme 
          Court adopted the method embraced by courts of appeal of 
          referring to Division 3.6 as the "Government Claims Act" instead 
          of the "Tort Claims Act."  The Court states: 

            Because of the broad scope of the claim requirements, a number 
            of Courts of Appeal have followed the suggestion in Baines 
            Pickwick that 'Government Claims Act' is a more appropriate 
            short title than the traditional 'Tort Claims Act.' We agree 
            that this practice is a useful way to reduce confusion over 
            the application of the claim requirements. Henceforth, we will 
            refer to title 1, division 3.6, parts 1 through 7 of the 
            Government Code (�Sec.] 810 et seq.) as the Government Claims 
            Act. (Id. at 741-742.)  




























                                                                      



          AB 2690 (Committee on Judiciary)
          Page 4 of ?



          CLRC's recommendations are consistent with the Court's adoption 
          of the more accurate "Government Claims Act" over the confusing 
          and factually misleading "Tort Claims Act." 


           Support  :  None Known

           Opposition  :  None Known

                                        HISTORY
           
           Source  :  California Law Revision Commission

           Related Pending Legislation  : None Known

           Prior Legislation  : 

          SB 42 (Cobey, Chapter 1681, Statutes of 1963) enacted Government 
          Code Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) at 
          request of CLRC.

          SB 43 (Cobey, Chapter 1715, Statutes of 1963) enacted Government 
          Code Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) at 
          request of CLRC.

          SB 44 (Cobey, Chapter 1682, Statutes of 1963) enacted Government 
          Code Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) at 
          request of CLRC.

          SB 45 (Cobey, Chapter 1683, Statutes of 1963) enacted Government 
          Code Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) at 
          request of CLRC.

          SB 47 (Cobey, Chapter 1684, Statutes of 1963) enacted Government 
          Code Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) at 
          request of CLRC.

          AB 1108 (Zenovich, Chapter 1805, Statutes of 1963) enacted 
          Government Code Title 1, Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 
          810) at request of CLRC. 


           Prior Vote  :

          Assembly Committee on Judiciary (Ayes 10, Noes 0)
          Assembly Floor (Ayes 76, Noes 0)
                                                                      



          AB 2690 (Committee on Judiciary)
          Page 5 of ?




                                   **************