BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 11 (Anderson)
Hearing Date: 5/26/2011 Amended: 5/3/2011
Consultant: Bob Franzoia Policy Vote: G O 12-0
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 11 would prohibit a state entity from assessing
a fine, interest, or penalty, based on a debt owed to the state
by an individual who, or entity that is a payee named in a
registered warrant, from the date the state issued the
registered warrant until at least 30 days after the date the
registered warrant is payable by the state.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund
Registered warrant prohibition
- Administration Unknown, likely significant General
- Payment of tax liabilities Estimated $1,300 to $13,000
(revenue loss) General in fiscal years
when registered warrants are
issued
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE.
This bill is silent regarding the hierarchy for penalty and
interest relief, including relief for debts of multiple state
entities. If, for example, a taxpayer was issued a registered
warrant on June 30, 2011, for $500 and owed a Franchise Tax
Board (board) tax debt of $600 and a Board of Equalization (BOE)
debt of $800, would the first $500 of both debts have the
interest and or associated fees waived? Staff recommends the
bill be amended to indicate the hierarchy of relief and require
the taxpayer to submit the registered warrant.
This bill would require the board to secure data from the
Controller to determine which individuals and business entities
that were issued registered warrants were also subject to a
> (>)
Page 1
penalty or interest on a debt imposed by the board. Board
systems would need to be reprogrammed to reverse previously
assessed penalties or interest and issue appropriate refunds.
Notices to advise the affected taxpayers would need to be
developed, tested, and issued. The BOE would likely incur
similar costs.
Information is not readily available that would enable the board
to match registered warrant amounts against taxpayer
liabilities. If, for example, registered warrants are issued in
June, 2011, and one to ten percent of the registered warrant
holders have outstanding tax liabilities equal to the average
amount of warrants previously issued in 2009, abatement of
interest and penalties for this group would result in a one-time
revenue loss of approximately $1.3 million to $13 million in
fiscal year 2010-11.