BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                                                       Bill No:  SB 
          32
          
                 SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
                       Senator Roderick D. Wright, Chair
                           2009-2010 Regular Session
                                 Staff Analysis



          SB 32  Author:  Leno
          As Introduced:  December 6, 2010
          Hearing Date:  March 22, 2011
          Consultant:  Art Terzakis


                                     SUBJECT  
                 Alcoholic Beverages:  definitions:  rectifiers

                                   DESCRIPTION
           
          SB 32 adds clarity to the definition of "rectifier" within 
          the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Act by expressly 
          excluding from the definition any on-sale licensee that 
          colors, flavors, or blends distilled spirits or wine 
          products on the licensed premises for consumption on those 
          premises. 

                                   EXISTING LAW

           
          Existing law establishes the Department of Alcoholic 
          Beverage Control (ABC) and grants it exclusive authority to 
          administer the provisions of the ABC Act in accordance with 
          laws enacted by the Legislature.  

          Existing law (Business & Professions Section 23016) defines 
          "rectifier" to mean every person who colors, flavors, or 
          otherwise processes distilled spirits by distillation, 
          blending, percolating, or other processes.

          Existing law (Business & Professions Section 23005) defines 
          "distilled spirits" to mean an alcoholic beverage obtained 
          by the distillation of fermented agricultural products, and 
          includes alcohol for beverage use, spirits of wine, 
          whiskey, rum, brandy, and gin, including all dilutions and 




          SB 32 (Leno) continued                                  
          Page 2
          


          mixtures thereof. 

          Existing law (Business & Professions Section 23368.1) 
          relating to a "distilled spirits rectifier's general 
          license" authorizes the licensee to cut, blend, rectify, 
          mix, flavor, and color distilled spirits, and whether so 
          cut, blended, mixed, flavored, or colored by him or any 
          other person to package, label, export, and sell the 
          distilled spirits to distilled spirits manufacturers, 
          distilled spirits manufacturer's agents, distilled spirits 
          wholesalers, distilled spirits general importers, 
          rectifiers, and distilled spirits general rectifiers.  

          Existing law defines an "on-sale" license as authorizing 
          the sale of all types of alcoholic beverages: namely, beer, 
          wine and distilled spirits, for consumption on the premises 
          (such as at a restaurant or bar).  An "off-sale" license 
          authorizes the sale of all types of alcoholic beverages for 
          consumption off the premises in original, sealed 
          containers.  
                                         
                                   BACKGROUND
           

           The Problem:   In late February 2010, the Department of ABC 
          announced that it would be cracking down on bars and 
          restaurants that were breaking the law (e.g., altering 
          alcohol) by making their own "infused" drinks.  The 
          department initially had issued an industry advisory, or 
          warning, in May 2008 relating to rectification of distilled 
          spirits in on-sale premises (bars and restaurants) that was 
          designed to prevent bartenders from modifying drinks to 
          increase the alcohol content of distilled spirits in 
          violation of existing license privileges. "Rectification" 
          is defined as any process or procedure whereby distilled 
          spirits (vodka, gin, tequila) are cut, blended, mixed or 
          infused with any ingredient (spices, herbs, fruit, 
          vegetables, etc.) which reacts with the constituents of the 
          distilled spirits and changes the character and nature or 
          standards of identity of the distilled spirits.  One 
          example of rectification is, but not necessarily limited 
          to, creating products such as 'lemoncello" or "limoncello" 
          in which sugar and citrus products are combined with vodka 
          and stored, initiating a maturation process which 
          consequently changes the character and nature of the vodka, 
          and possibly its alcohol content.  The simple mixing of 




          SB 32 (Leno) continued                                  
          Page 3
          


          alcoholic beverages with other ingredients for  immediate  
          consumption (e.g., mint leaves in mojitos) is not 
          considered rectification.


          The author's office notes that the original intent of ABC 
          law referenced above was to protect the public from watered 
          down or adulterated - and potentially dangerous - alcoholic 
          beverages.  The author's office contends that such concerns 
          no longer apply to the current practice of treating spirits 
          as an element of culinary creativity.  The author's office 
          estimates that approximately 50% of San Francisco area bars 
          created and served infusions prior to the department taking 
          action to issue warnings to licensees.  Many of these 
          establishments stopped serving infusions with a resulting 
          drop in business.  


           The Solution:   This measure would modify the definition of 
          rectifier within the ABC Act so as not to require that an 
          on-sale licensee obtain a separate rectifier license for 
          this business activity (infusion) .  Specifically, this 
          measure is intended to permit on-sale licensees to engage 
          in the artisanal practice of making small amounts of 
          spirits flavored with fruit, vegetables and spices on the 
          licensed premises for consumption solely on the licensee's 
          premises.  The author's office emphasizes that SB 32 would 
          simply update existing law to recognize this innovation and 
          validate the existing practice.     


           Arguments in Support:   Proponents argue that the act or art 
          of mixing drinks from distilled spirits or wine for 
          consumption on licensed premises should not be considered a 
          production process requiring a separate license.  
          Proponents believe that SB 32 is a straightforward solution 
          that relieves a potential enforcement situation for tens of 
          thousands of license holders throughout the state.  

                                         


                           PRIOR/RELATED LEGISLATION
           
           SB 39 (Padilla) 2011-12 Session.   Would prohibit the 
          import, production, manufacture, distribution, or sale of 




          SB 32 (Leno) continued                                  
          Page 4
          


          "caffeinated" beer beverages, as defined, at retail 
          locations within the state.  (Pending in this Committee)
          
           SB 1022 (Strickland) Chapter 281, Statutes of 2010.   
          Expanded an existing tied-house exception within the ABC 
          Act to enable licensed distilled spirits "rectifiers" to 
          donate or sell their products to specified nonprofit 
          entities for the purpose of assisting in fund-raising 
          efforts.

          SUPPORT:   As of March 18, 2011:

          California Music and Culture Association
          California Restaurant Association
          Family Winemakers of California
          Golden Gate Restaurant Association

           OPPOSE:   None on file as of March 18, 2011.

           FISCAL COMMITTEE:   Senate Committee on Appropriations


                                   **********