BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 32
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 17, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 32 (Leno) - As Amended: May 26, 2011
Policy Committee: Governmental
Organization Vote: 14 - 0
Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill modifies the definition of rectifier to exclude from
the definition any on-sale licensee who infuses distilled
spirits or wine products with colors and flavors or blends
distilled spirits and/or wine, as long as those alcoholic drinks
are only sold for consumption on the premises.
FISCAL EFFECT
There are no significant costs associated with this legislation.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The purpose of this bill is to update the law to
allow bars and restaurants to infuse their drinks with colors
and flavors. Examples of infused drinks include fruit flavored
vodka or homemade sangria. Under current law the Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) has determined that on-sale
licensees who blend or infuse drinks are violating tied-house
laws by also acting as a rectifier. This bill would modify the
definition of rectifier to make it clear that it does not
include these types of drinks.
2)Rectifier . Under current law, a rectifier is someone who
colors, flavors, or otherwise processes distilled spirits by
distillation, blending, percolating, or other processes.
3)The tied-house law refers to the statutory restriction on
cross-ownership among the three tiers of the alcohol industry:
manufacturers, distributors/wholesalers, and retailers. The
Legislature has generally prohibited forms of cross-ownership
SB 32
Page 2
between manufacturers and retailers, and discouraged
manufacturers from providing anything of value-free goods,
services, or advertising-to distributors or retailers.
Numerous exceptions to these restrictions have been enacted
over the years in instances where the Legislature determined
that the public's interests are protected.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081