BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SJR 19
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SJR 19 (Strickland)
          As Amended  April 19, 2012
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :35-0  
           
           VETERANS AFFAIRS    8-0                                         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Cook, Pan, Atkins, Block, |     |                          |
          |     |Gorell,                   |     |                          |
          |     |V. Manuel P�rez,          |     |                          |
          |     |Williams, Yamada          |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  This measure urges the California delegates of 
          Congress to protect California military bases from closure 
          during upcoming base realignment and closure (BRAC) processes.  
          Specifically,  this bill  resolves: 

          1)That the Legislature urges the California delegates of 
            Congress to protect California military bases during upcoming 
            base realignment and closure processes.

          2)That California military bases are a vital part of our 
            national security, particularly with California's proximity to 
            the unrest in Asia.

          3)That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this 
            resolution to the President and Vice President of the United 
            States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the 
            Majority Leader of the Senate, to the minority leader of each 
            house, and to each Senator and Representative from California 
            in the Congress of the United States. 
           
          EXISTING LAW  :

          10 U.S. Code Section 2687 discusses the BRAC process.  No base 
          (as defined) may be closed or realigned unless and until:

          1)The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military 
            department concerned notifies the Committee on Armed Services 
            of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House 








                                                                  SJR 19
                                                                  Page  2


            of Representatives, as part of an annual request for 
            authorization of appropriations to such Committees, of the 
            proposed closing or realignment and submits with the 
            notification:

             a)   An evaluation of the fiscal, local economic, budgetary, 
               environmental, strategic, and operational consequences of 
               such closure or realignment; and,

             b)   The criteria used to consider and recommend military 
               installations for such closure or realignment.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the 
          Legislative Counsel.

           COMMENTS  :  Defense Secretary Leon Panetta included in the 
          Department of Defense (DoD) annual request for authorization a 
          request for BRAC in 2013 and 2015.  However, the House and 
          Senate Armed Services committees rejected a new base-closing 
          round in their versions of the annual defense authorization bill 
          for next year.  In addition, "It's now clear obviously there 
          will not be a round of BRAC authorized" in 2013, Panetta said in 
          a speech to the Association of Defense Communities in Monterey, 
          California.  Therefore it seems unlikely that BRAC will occur in 
          2013.

          However, past rounds of BRAC had huge impacts on California.  
          Total net DoD personnel cuts from the four BRAC Rounds in 1988, 
          1991, 1993, and 1995 for all U.S. states except California were 
          80,373; California lost 93,546.  In those four rounds, 
          California absorbed 54% of the nation's overall personnel cuts 
          and lost nearly 30 major bases. In the 2005 round, over 40 
          bases/installations and facilities were affected in the state.  

          Though BRAC seems unlikely to happen in 2013, it was requested 
          by the DoD, and the National Defense Authorization Act versions 
          thus far do not affect the possibility of BRAC after 2013.  
          DoD's presence in California offers unique strategic military 
          benefits to the Nation, particularly in light of the military's 
          new focus on the Pacific region.  Furthermore, DoD in 2009 spent 
          approximately $56 billion in California.  Its contribution to 
          the California economy continues to be extremely important.  For 
          all of the foregoing reasons, sending a strong message and 
          taking a position of vigilance and concern about BRAC now is 








                                                                  SJR 19
                                                                  Page  3


          wise.  The bases selected demonstrate the strategic importance 
          of California, however, they leave out many other vitally 
          important bases.  The author might consider either a general 
          statement opposing closures highlighting those bases most in 
          danger of closure for maximum impact instead of choosing a 
          sampling based on armed service representation. 


           Analysis Prepared by  :    John Spangler / V. A. / (916) 319-3550 


                                                                FN: 0004885