BILL ANALYSIS �
SJR 24
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING
SJR 24 (Harman)
As Introduced April 26, 2012
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE :35-0
VETERANS AFFAIRS 8-0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Cook, Pan, Atkins, Block, | | |
| |Gorell, V. Manuel | | |
| |P�rez, Williams, Yamada | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Urges the California delegates of the Congress of the
United States to protect the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach
during any upcoming base realignment and closure (BRAC)
processes.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown. This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the
Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS : Defense Secretary Leon Panetta included in the
Department of Defense (DoD) annual request for authorization a
request for BRAC in 2013 and 2015. However, the House and
Senate Armed Services committees rejected a new base-closing
round in their versions of the annual defense authorization bill
for next year. In addition, "It's now clear obviously there
will not be a round of BRAC authorized" in 2013, Panetta said in
a speech to the Association of Defense Communities in Monterey,
California. Therefore it seems unlikely that BRAC will occur in
2013.
However, past rounds of BRAC had huge impacts on California.
Total net DoD personnel cuts from the four BRAC Rounds in 1988,
1991, 1993, and 1995 for all U.S. states except California were
80,373; California lost 93,546. In those four rounds,
California absorbed 54% of the nation's overall personnel cuts
and lost nearly 30 major bases. In the 2005 round, over 40
bases/installations and facilities were affected in the state.
Though BRAC seems unlikely to happen in 2013, it was requested
by the DoD, and the National Defense Authorization Act versions
SJR 24
Page 2
thus far do not affect the possibility of BRAC after 2013.
DoD's presence in California offers unique strategic military
benefits to the Nation, particularly in light of the military's
new focus on the Pacific region. Furthermore, DoD in 2009 spent
approximately $56 billion in California. Its contribution to
the California economy continues to be extremely important. For
all of the foregoing reasons, sending a strong message and
taking a position of vigilance and concern about BRAC now is
wise.
Analysis Prepared by : John Spangler / V. A. / (916) 319-3550
FN: 0004890