BILL ANALYSIS �
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SJR 28|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SJR 28
Author: Emmerson (R), et al.
Amended: 6/15/12
Vote: 21
SENATE VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE : 7-0, 6/26/12
AYES: Correa, Cannella, Berryhill, Calderon, Negrete
McLeod, Rubio, Lieu
NO VOTE RECORDED: Runner
SUBJECT : Department of Defense budget cuts
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This resolution opposes budget cuts to the Air
National Guard presented by the United States Air Force to
the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States.
ANALYSIS : This resolution makes the following
legislative findings:
1. With increased budget pressure in Washington, D.C., the
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is cutting back to save
money.
2. National Guard units, whether land or air, are reserve
components of their active duty counterparts.
3. The federal government through the DoD makes strategic
CONTINUED
SJR 28
Page
2
decisions regarding the balance of active duty and
reserve components based on national security.
4. The U.S. Army has made the strategic decision that for
cost saving measures it would like to put more resources
into reserve components.
5. The U.S. Air Force is going in the opposite direction
and strategically putting more of its resources into
active duty components rather than into reserve
components.
6. This year, the 144th Air Wing in Fresno is scheduled to
convert from the F-16 to the F-15 air superiority
fighter. The new mission was to be transferred from
Montana. Now, Montana is being considered for an Air
National Guard cut and wants to retain its F-15 mission
and not have it transferred to California.
7. The fight with Montana spawned AJR 31 (Perea), which
never came before either policy committee in either
house of the Legislature.
FISCAL EFFECT : Fiscal Com.: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 6/26/12) (per Senate Veterans Affairs
Committee analysis)
County of Riverside
RM:k 6/26/12 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****