BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: SCR 97
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  gaines
                                                         VERSION: 6/14/12
          Analysis by:  Carrie Cornwell                  FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date:  June 26, 2012



          SUBJECT:

          Senator Dave Cox Interchange

          DESCRIPTION:

          This resolution names the interchange of State Highway Route 
          (SR) 50 and Hazel Avenue in Sacramento County as the Senator 
          Dave Cox Interchange.

          ANALYSIS:

          The committee has adopted a policy regarding the naming of state 
          highways or structures.  Under the policy, the committee will 
          consider only those resolutions that meet all of the following 
          criteria:

                 The person being honored must have provided 
               extraordinary public service or some exemplary contribution 
               to the public good and have a connection to the community 
               where the highway is located.

                 The person being honored must be deceased.

                 The naming must be done without cost to the state.  
               Costs for signs and plaques must be paid by local or 
               private sources.

                 The author or co-author of the resolution must represent 
               the district in which the facility is located and the 
               resolution must identify the specific highway segment or 
               structure being named.

                 The segment of highway being named must not exceed five 
               miles in length.

                 The proposed designation must reflect a community 
               consensus and be without local opposition.




          SCR 97 (GAINES)                                        Page 2

                                                                       



                 The proposed designation may not supersede an existing 
               designation unless the sponsor can document that a good 
               faith effort has uncovered no opposition to rescinding the 
               prior designation.
          
           This resolution  designates the interchange of SR 50 and Hazel 
          Avenue located in Sacramento County as the Senator Dave Cox 
          Interchange.  The resolution further requests that the 
          Department of Transportation erect appropriate signs upon 
          receiving donations from non-state sources to cover the costs.  
          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose  .  The author introduced this resolution to honor the 
            life and public service of Dave Cox.    
          
           2.Background on Senator Dave Cox  .  Born in Oklahoma in 1938, 
            Dave Cox came to California and attended the University of San 
            Diego.  He maintained a life insurance business while also 
            being active in community and church activities.  He served in 
            local elected office both on the Sacramento Municipal Utility 
            District Board and on the Sacramento County of Board of 
            Supervisors.  In 1998, he won election to the State Assembly, 
            where he served for six years, including a stint as the 
            Assembly Republican Leader.  In 2004, Cox won election to the 
            California State Senate, where he represented the first 
            district until his death in 2010.  He is survived by his wife, 
            Maggie, and their daughters Cathleen, Margo, and Sarah, as 
            well as six grandchildren.

           3.Consistent with the committee's policy  .  This resolution is 
            consistent with all of the provisions of the committee's 
            policy on highway designations.
          
          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on 
          Wednesday,                                             June 20, 
          2012)

               SUPPORT:  Regional Council of Rural Counties

               OPPOSED:  None received.









          SCR 97 (GAINES)                                        Page 3