BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 123 (Liu)
Hearing Date: 5/2/2011 Amended: 4/4/2011
Consultant: Jolie Onodera Policy Vote: Public Safety 6-1
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 123 would require the California Emergency
Management Agency (Cal EMA), subject to the availability of
adequate resources, to develop a statewide plan for runaway,
homeless, and exploited youth in collaboration with the Senate
Office of Research (SOR) and various stakeholders.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund
Development/coordination $90 $180
$160General
of plan
Statewide plan Likely substantial future cost
pressureGeneral/
to implement the plan Federal*
*Various programs/activities addressing at risk youth are
eligible for federal funding.
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the
Suspense File.
This bill seeks to address the serious issue of youth
homelessness and exploitation by the development of a statewide
plan reflecting a range of cost-effective, evidence-based
practices for runaway, homeless, and exploited youth. The bill
requires the Cal EMA to develop this plan in collaboration with
the SOR and a broad spectrum of stakeholders responsible for
addressing the needs of this population, including but not
limited to government agencies, youth advocates, and others with
expertise in the areas of social services, mental health,
housing, education, and public safety, as well as homeless youth
service providers and impacted youth.
The bill specifies that the plan shall include all of the
following:
A determination for the statewide demand for shelter,
housing, and supportive services for runaway, homeless, and
exploited youth, as defined;
SB 123 (Liu)
Page 3
An identification of data and outcome measures from which
to evaluate public investment in runaway, homeless, and
exploited youth services;
A proposal for a consistent revenue stream to meet the
demand for shelter, housing, and services for these youth;
An examination of the federal definition of "status
offender" and make legislative recommendations regarding the
relevant sections of state law;
A description of the role of the child welfare system in
preventing and addressing homelessness for minors
experiencing abuse and neglect; and
A description of the role of law enforcement in responding
to runaway youth.
Once the plan is created, the bill requires Cal EMA to be the
entity responsible for the coordination of information, support
services, and other resources for public and private entities
serving runaway, homeless, and exploited youth in California.
Cal EMA indicates development of the plan could not be
accomplished within existing resources and would require
designated staff to lead in the development of the plan and
coordinate meetings with various stakeholders as identified in
the bill. Cal EMA would require one-full time staff position at
an annual cost of approximately $160,000, in addition to $20,000
for coordinating stakeholder meetings during plan development.
Upon completion of the plan, continued staff resources would be
needed to support CalEMA's responsibility for ongoing statewide
coordination. The SOR has indicated its role in the development
of the plan could be absorbed within existing resources. The
workload on other non-lead agencies participating in the plan
development process is unknown, but would likely be minor.
There would be substantial cost pressure to implement the plan,
once developed. The extent of those costs and the agencies that
would incur those costs are unknown and would be dependent upon
the specific recommendations and best practices outlined in the
plan. To the extent that this bill results in innovative and
cost-effective services provided to runaway, homeless, and
exploited youth, there will likely be significant savings to
local governments and law enforcement agencies. Depending on the
nature of these services, there may be significant cost savings
to the state in public safety and social services programs in
the future.
SB 123 (Liu)
Page 4