BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 152
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 29, 2011

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                                Cameron Smyth, Chair
                     SB 152 (Pavley) - As Amended:  May 25, 2011

           SENATE VOTE  :  24-15
           
          SUBJECT  :  Public lands: general leasing law: littoral 
          landowners.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the State Lands Commission (SLC) to charge 
          rent for a private recreational pier constructed on state lands. 
           Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Repeals the prohibition against charging rent for any private 
            recreational pier constructed on state lands for the use of a 
            littoral landowner.

          2)Makes findings and declarations that the use of state-owned 
            lands for a private recreational pier is not a property right 
            for littoral or riparian landowners, but a privilege granted 
            by SLC on behalf of the state.

          3)Requires SLC to charge rent for a private recreational pier 
            constructed on state lands. Rent shall be based on local 
            conditions and local fair annual rental values.

          4)Specifies that the provisions of this measure shall not apply 
            to the following:

             a)   A lease in effect on July 1, 2011, for the term of that 
               lease; and, 

             b)   A lease for which the application and application fees 
               were submitted to SLC prior to March 31, 2011.

          5)Defines "recreational pier" to include a fixed facility for 
            the docking or mooring of boats.

          6)Deletes conflicting findings and declarations.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires SLC, upon receipt of an application to lease public 








                                                                  SB 152
                                                                  Page  2

            lands, to appraise the lands and fix the annual rent or other 
            consideration therefor.  

          2)Prohibits rent from being charged for any private recreational 
            pier constructed on state lands for the use of a littoral 
            landowner. 

          3)Requires a littoral landowner to pay to SLC, in accordance 
            with its rules and regulations, SLC's expenses in issuing a 
            lease or permit for the state lands.

          4)Defines "littoral landowner" as (a) any natural person or 
            persons who own littoral land improved with, and used solely 
            for, a single-family dwelling or (b) any association of, or 
            any nonprofit corporation consisting of, natural persons who 
            own parcels of land, each of which is zoned or used solely for 
            a single-family dwelling, and who are entitled to the use of a 
            private recreational pier on littoral land that is owned by 
            the association or nonprofit corporation and is not more than 
            one mile from any such parcel owned by a member thereof.

          5)Defines "recreational pier" to include any fixed facility for 
            the docking or mooring of boats that is constructed for the 
            use of the littoral landowner.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)The state owns tide and submerged lands for the purposes of 
            commerce, navigation, recreation, fisheries, and the 
            protection of natural resources.  These lands are held in 
            trust for the benefit of all people of the state.  State law 
            authorizes SLC to lease these state lands for appropriate 
            purposes in exchange for annual rent with the proceeds being 
            deposited in the General Fund. 

            However, existing law prohibits rent from being charged for 
            some private recreational piers constructed on state lands 
            even though the structure and the associated improvements 
            occupy space on a state owned waterway.  Recreational piers 
            include, but are not limited to, fixed piers and floating 
            docks and any affiliated boat houses and boatlifts and 
            individual private mooring buoys. 









                                                                  SB 152
                                                                  Page  3

          2)In 1976, the Attorney General (AG) issued a formal opinion 
            concluding that the issuance of a rent-free lease to certain 
            landowners for a private recreational pier on state land is an 
            unconstitutional gift of public property.  The AG opined that 
            the Legislature cannot put state lands under the use and 
            control of private parties except if it is in the interest of 
            the public statewide.  The AG concluded that there was no such 
            public benefit provided by rent-free private recreational pier 
            leases.  

          3)In response, the Legislature in 1977 adopted findings that 
            there is a substantial public benefit from the construction 
            and maintenance of private recreational piers.  However, 
            according to the author it is arguable whether these purported 
            benefits have materialized.  The reality is that these 
            recreational piers and buoys are generally used exclusively by 
            the landowner for private purposes. In fact, many of these 
            piers are fenced and can also block access to public areas, 
            such as beaches. 

          4)According to the author the rent free leases for piers provide 
            a benefit to an arbitrary special class of owners of private 
            piers located on state property. This benefit is only 
            conferred on a special class of owners whose recreational 
            piers are built on state land. The rent-free provisions do not 
            apply to recreational piers built over certain public trust 
            lands, known as granted lands, which are state lands managed 
            on behalf of the state by local government.  As a result, 
            private pier owners on Lake Tahoe receive free rent while 
            private pier owners on Clear Lake pay market-rate rent despite 
            the only difference between these situations is Clear Lake is 
            managed by a local government and Lake Tahoe is managed by 
            SLC.  According to SLC most of the rent-free leases are for 
            piers located in three general areas: Lake Tahoe/Donner 
            (almost half of all leases), the Sacramento River Delta, and 
            Huntington Harbor in Orange County. 


          5)Support arguments:  Supporters argue that rent-free leases for 
            piers offer no significant public benefit thereby constituting 
            an unconstitutional gift of public lands.  Moreover, 
          SB 152 fixes an inequity amongst state lands that are managed by 
            SLC versus those managed in trust by a local government.

            Opposition arguments:  Opponents of the bill argue that 








                                                                 SB 152
                                                                  Page  4

            property values of littoral landowners that have built docks 
            will diminish as a result of the bill. They also argue that 
            the individual homeowners absorbed the cost of constructing 
            and maintaining the piers under the assumption that they would 
            be rent-free. 

          6)This bill is double-referred to the Committees on Natural 
            Resources and Local Government.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          California State Lands Commission �SPONSOR]
          Sierra Club California
           
            Opposition 
           
          Individual letters (34) 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Katie Kolitsos  / L. GOV. / (916) 
          319-3958