BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 175|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 175
          Author:   Corbett (D), et al
          Amended:  4/26/11
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE  :  7-3, 4/12/11
          AYES:  Wright, Calderon, Corbett, De Le�n, Hernandez, 
            Padilla, Yee
          NOES:  Anderson, Strickland, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Berryhill, Cannella, Evans

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-3, 5/26/11
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Pavley, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Emmerson, Runner


           SUBJECT  :    Public contracts:  bid preferences:  solar 
          photovoltaic system

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires a state agency that accepts 
          bids or proposals for a contract for the purchase or 
          installation of a solar photovoltaic system, as defined, to 
          provide a five percent preference to a business that 
          certifies that all of the solar panels installed as part of 
          the solar photovoltaic system have been manufactured or 
          assembled in California, in accordance with specified 
          criteria.

           ANALYSIS  :    
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 175
                                                                Page 
          2


           Existing law  : 

          1. Establishes rules governing the awarding of contracts by 
             state agencies, including general requirements for 
             competitive bidding on contracts for 
             construction projects, goods, services, and information 
             technology.
           
          2. Requires the California Energy Commission to give 
             priority to "California-based" entities in making awards 
             under the Public Interest Research, Development and 
             Demonstration Fund program.

          3. Entitles California disabled veteran businesses and 
             small businesses certified by the Department of General 
             Services (DGS) to a 5 percent preference in bidding on 
             state contracts for goods, services, information 
             technology and for state public construction contracts.  


          4. Requires the state to award a 5 percent preference in 
             contracts for goods and services to California based 
             firms that demonstrate and certify that at least 50 
             percent of the total labor hours for manufactured goods 
             or 90 percent of the total labor hours for services will 
             be performed in qualifying areas. 

          5. Establishes a Self-Generation Incentive Program to 
             provide subsidies for customer-owned electric generation 
             facilities, with an additional 20 percent incentive for 
             installation of eligible distributed generation 
             resources from "California suppliers."

          This bill requires a state agency that accepts bids or 
          proposals for a contract for the purchase or installation 
          of a solar photovoltaic system, as defined, to provide a 
          five percent preference to a business that certifies that 
          all of the solar panels installed as part of the solar 
          photovoltaic system have been manufactured or assembled in 
          California, in accordance with specified criteria.
           
          Comments
           

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 175
                                                                Page 
          3

          Preferences can currently be given for small business in 
          general, disabled veteran owned business enterprises, for 
          small businesses in economically targeted areas, and for 
          businesses, regardless of size, located in economically 
          distressed areas.  The maximum amount provided for each 
          qualifying bidding preference is $50,000 with a total bid 
          maximum of $100,000.  Thus, a contractor with a bid of up 
          to $100,000 higher than the lowest bid can be awarded the 
          contract if he/she qualifies for two bidding preferences.

           Related legislation  

          SB 967 (Correa), of 2009-10 Session, would have required 
          state agencies that accept bids on contracts for goods or 
          services, or for the distribution of funds pursuant to the 
          federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, to 
          provide a credit of five percent of the bid price or 
          quotation to a business if 90 percent of its employees 
          reside in the state. (Vetoed) 

          SB 1249 (Ducheny), of  2009-10 Session, would have 
          authorized DGS to use an additional criterion in the 
          bidding and procurement process that takes into 
          consideration the relative economic benefit to California 
          in considering bids for goods and services. (Held in 
          Assembly)

          AB 2267 (Fuentes), Chapter 537, Statutes of 08 Session, 
          requires the California Energy Commission to give priority 
          to California-based entities when making Public Interest 
          Energy Research, Demonstration and Development awards.  
          Provides an additional 20 percent incentive from the Public 
          Utilities Commission's Self Generation Incentive Program 
          funds, for the installation of eligible distributed 
          generation resources from a California supplier.
           
          AB 608 (De La Torre), of 2007-08 Session, would have 
          increased the procurement contract bid preference from five 
          percent to 10 percent for small businesses.  (Vetoed)

          AB 1654 (De La Torre), of 2005-06, is similar to SB 967 
          (Correa) of 2010. (Held in Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee)


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 175
                                                                Page 
          4

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2011-12     2012-13    
           2013-14   Fund  

          Bid preference      Unknown, but potentially major annual   
            General/
                              costs, to the extent state contracts 
          are           Special
                              awarded to other than the lowest bidder
                              due to the preference.  To the extent
                              the residency requirement dissuades
                              contractors from bidding, costs may
                              increase due to reduced competition 
               
          Contract administrationUnknown, minor to significant costs 
          to      General/
                              determine compliance with residency
                              requirement; potential increase in bid
                              protests 

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/25/11)

          California Labor Federation
          City of Fremont
          Clean Economy Network
          Fremont Chamber of Commerce
          NanoSolar
          Sierra Club California
          Solaria
          Solyndra
          State Building and Construction Trades Council of 
          California

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/25/11)

          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 175
                                                                Page 
          5

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office, 
          "California has several companies that manufacture solar 
          panels in the state, employing Californians and helping our 
          economy.  Other states and countries are using tax 
          incentives, low interest loans, cheap labor, and cheap 
          dirty energy to lure California clean tech manufacturers 
          away from California.  Many other states have preferences 
          for state-manufactured goods, such as Alaska, Idaho, 
          Montana, and West Virginia.  If California is going to 
          install solar panels on state property, it should attempt 
          to support California manufacturers."

          The California Labor Federation notes that investment in 
          manufacturing is a smart way to get California on the road 
          to recovery and lay a foundation for a robust economy.  
          Manufacturing jobs have the highest multiplier effect of 
          any job classification in any industry for every 
          manufacturing job created an additional 2.5 jobs are 
          created in the broader economy.  The state should make 
          every effort to make sure that the products invented here 
          are built here. 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    Opponents argue that bidding 
          preferences ultimately limit choice and drive up prices, 
          including the cost of energy for consumers and for the 
          state.  Moreover, opponents argue, protectionist 
          legislation causes a net loss of jobs in related 
          industries, retaliation by our trading partners, and 
          violates provisions of the WTO and bilateral free trade 
          agreements. 
           

          PQ:do  5/27/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          







                                                           CONTINUED