BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 183
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 17, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 183 (Correa) - As Introduced: February 7, 2011
Policy Committee: ElectionsVote:5-2
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill requires a ballot containing extraneous marks or
personal information to nevertheless be counted instead of being
void. Specifically, this bill:
1)Deletes the instruction to voters that distinguishing marks
make a ballot void and instead instructs voters that marking a
ballot outside the designated spaces may compromise the
secrecy of the ballot.
2)Stipulates that no voter shall place personal information, as
specified, on a ballot, and stipulates that including such
personal information shall not render a ballot void as is
currently the case.
3)Requires that, for ballots containing personal information, a
duplicate ballot shall be prepared-similar to existing
procedures for ballots that are torn, bent or mutilated-and
tabulated.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor state reimbursable costs for county elections officials to
modify voter instructions, and to duplicate and tabulate, rather
than void, ballots inappropriately marked with personal
information.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . Prior to the advent of voting systems that use an
automated tabulation component, paper ballots were routinely
counted by hand. If the elections official who was
SB 183
Page 2
hand-counting those ballots was compliant, vote-buying could
occur if a voter made an identifying mark on his or her
ballot. In order to address this possibility, the law
provided that any distinguishing marks or erasures would
render a ballot void.
In support, the Secretary of State argues that this measure
will prevent ballots from being disqualified simply because a
voter placed a random mark on their ballot that did not affect
the integrity of their vote. The secretary maintains that any
implementation costs should be minor due to the small number
of ballots that the bill will impact.
2)Prior Legislation . In 2009, an identical bill, SB 387
(Hancock), was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger, who
expressed concern that "remaking a ballot that contains
personal identifying information compromises ballot secrecy
and increases the opportunity for fraud."
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081