BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 205
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 17, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 205 (Correa) - As Introduced: February 8, 2011
Policy Committee: ElectionsVote:5-2
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill:
1)Makes it a misdemeanor for a person to offer to pay or to
receive payment on a per-registration basis for assisting
another person to register to vote by receiving their
completed affidavit of registration.
2)Provides that nothing in the bill shall be construed to
prohibit payment for assisting another person to register to
vote by receiving the completed affidavit that is not on a
per-affidavit basis.
FISCAL EFFECT
Potential minor nonreimbursable costs to cities and counties for
enforcement, offset to some extent by fine revenues.
COMMENTS
1)Background and Purpose . In each of the last three election
cycles, voters have file complaints stating that they were
misled into changing their party affiliations. According to
media reports of these complaints, the voter registration
workers who were accused of misleading these voters were paid
as much as $15 for each new voter that the worker registered
with a particular political party.
According to the Secretary of State's Election Fraud
Investigation Unit (EFIU), between 1994 and 2010, a total of
SB 205
Page 2
960 cases were opened for fraudulent voter registration or
fraudulently altering party affiliation on voter registration
cards. Of this total, 99 cases were referred to district
attorneys for prosecution, resulting in 64 convictions. These
cases involving voter registration fraud outnumber any other
type of election crime.
SB 205 prohibits payment on a per-affidavit basis for voter
registration. At least 11 have a similar law: Colorado,
Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, Nevada,
Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Washington, and Wisconsin.
2)Related Legislation . SB 168 (Corbett), 2011, makes it a
misdemeanor for anyone to pay, or be paid, based on the number
of signatures obtained for a state or local initiative,
referendum, or recall petition. SB 168 was vetoed; the
governor cited uncontended consequences, such as increasing
the cost of circulating petitions and disincentivizing
productivity goals.
3)Prior Legislation . In 2007, SB 812 (Correa), a similar bill,
passed this committee but was subsequently amended to address
an unrelated issue.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081