BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 226
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 6, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 226 (Simitian) - As Introduced: February 9, 2011
Policy Committee: Natural
ResourcesVote:9-0
Local Government 9-0
Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes procedural changes that allow referrals
required under the Planning and Zone Law to occur concurrent
with a meeting required under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). Specifically, this bill authorizes a
planning agency to refer to a city or county, concurrent with
the required scoping meeting, a proposed action that adopts or
substantially amends a general plan.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible state costs, if any.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. The author contends the streamlining measures
proposed by this bill will maintain existing legal
requirements concerning proposed actions to modify general
plans while better facilitating participation by interested
parties.
2)Background. Proposed adoptions of amendments to general plans
are likely to be affected by two areas of law-the Planning and
Zoning Law and CEQA. The Planning and Zoning Law requires a
planning agency to refer a proposed action to adopt or
substantially amend a general plan to certain entities for
comment before the legislative body takes action on the
general plan adoption or amendment. These entities include
any city and county within or abutting the area covered by the
proposal.
SB 226
Page 2
CEQA requires a lead agency, meaning an agency with principal
responsibility for carrying out or approving a proposed
discretionary project, to hold at least one scoping meeting
for a proposed project of statewide, regional, or area-wide
significance. The lead agency must notify certain entities
of at the scoping meeting, including any county or city
bordering a county or city within which the project is
located.
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081