BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 263
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 263 (Pavley)
          As Amended  September 2, 2011
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :25-14  
          
           WATER, PARKS & WILDLIFE   8-4   GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION   9-5 
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Huffman, Blumenfield,     |Ayes:|Hall, Atkins, Block,      |
          |     |Fong, Gatto, Roger        |     |Gatto, Hill, Ma, Perea,   |
          |     |Hern�ndez, Hueso, Lara,   |     |V. Manuel P�rez, Torres   |
          |     |Yamada                    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Halderman, Bill           |Nays:|Nestande, Cook, Garrick,  |
          |     |Berryhill, Jones, Olsen   |     |Jeffries,                 |
          |     |                          |     |Silva                     |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      11-6                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford, Campos, Davis,  |     |                          |
          |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Solorio         |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Charles Calderon, |     |                          |
          |     |Donnelly, Nielsen, Norby, |     |                          |
          |     |Wagner                    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to 
          make the reports that well drillers must submit when a well is 
          constructed, deepened, reperforated, or destroyed available, 
          with certain restrictions, to governmental agencies for studies, 
          college-level or higher academics for research, geologists, 
          geophysicists, hydrologists, civil engineers, licensed well 
          contractors or any person who obtains written authorization from 
          the well owner.  Makes any person who knowingly violates the 
          restrictions on the use or sharing of a well completion report 








                                                                  SB 263
                                                                  Page  2

          guilty of a misdemeanor violation punishable by up to $25,000 
          per day, a year in county jail, or both.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires any person who digs, bores, or drills a water well, 
            cathodic protection well, or a monitoring well, or abandons or 
            destroys a well, or deepens or reperforates a well, to file a 
            report of completion with DWR.

          2)Prohibits those well completion reports from being made 
            available to the public, except under certain circumstances.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, an ongoing annual cost of between $100,000 and 
          $125,000 to DWR to remove, consistent with existing state law, 
          identifying personal information from well completion reports.  
          (General Fund or special fund.)

           COMMENTS  :  Well completion reports, also known as drillers' logs 
          or well logs, provide a snapshot in time of the geology, 
          groundwater table, and conditions at the location where a well 
          is constructed, deepened, reperforated, or destroyed.  Well 
          completion reports include, among other things, the location and 
          depth of the well, the type of soils encountered at each 
          drilling elevation, depth to water, etc.  

          According to the author, much information pinpointing well 
          locations is currently available on the Internet but what the 
          completion reports contain, which is not commonly available, are 
          details regarding subsurface geology and water levels.  This 
          geophysical information is critical to groundwater managers, 
          consulting hydrologists, academics, community interest groups 
          and homeowners who cannot currently access it.  The author 
          states that well completion reports can be used to construct 
          detailed underground aquifer maps which, along with 
          hydrogeological data, are essential to developing and 
          implementing groundwater management plans, including determining 
          possible locations for efficient and effective groundwater 
          banking, identifying key recharge areas, and better protecting 
          and improve groundwater quality.  Supporters point out that in 
          other states reviewing well logs is considered due diligence 
          when buying a home with an existing well or drilling a new well 
          and that no other western state restricts access to well 
          completion reports - even after the September 11 terrorist 








                                                                  SB 263
                                                                  Page  3

          attacks - and that most western states even provide Internet 
          access to well reports.  Supporters advise that this bill would 
          help meet the need for transparency in groundwater information.

          Opponents of this bill state that allowing members of the public 
          to request well completion reports from DWR could provide 
          terrorists and saboteurs with well locations and increase safety 
          risks to public water supplies.  Opponents maintain that, since 
          water systems must conduct vulnerability assessments and 
          implement homeland security measures to help protect water 
          supplies and facilities, making well information publicly 
          available is in direct conflict with those goals as well as 
          local, state and federal efforts.  Opponents assert, generally, 
          that the drinking and wastewater sectors are vulnerable to a 
          variety of attacks and point out that DPH, which oversees 
          state-level homeland security initiatives for water systems, no 
          longer releases physical well location information to the 
          public.  

          In response to opponents concerns, the author amended the bill 
          so that only government agencies, academic researchers, licensed 
          geologists, geophysicists, hydrologists, civil engineers, or 
          well contractors, or persons who have written authorization from 
          the well owner, can require DWR to provide a well completion 
          report.  The authorized recipient must identify the intended use 
          of the report and is prohibited from disclosing the exact 
          location of a well, sharing the report with any other person or 
          entity not involved in the study or research, or using the 
          report information for sale, resale, solicitation or 
          advertisement for sales or services.  The punishment for 
          knowingly violating the restrictions on the sharing or use of a 
          report is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 
          for each day of the violation, imprisonment of up to a year in 
          the county jail, or both.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Tina Cannon Leahy / W., P. & W. / (916) 
          319-2096           



                                                                FN: 0002676












                                                                  SB 263
                                                                  Page  4