BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 267
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 17, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 267 (Rubio) - As Amended: April 13, 2011
Policy Committee: Water, Parks and
Wildlife Vote: 9-0
Local Government 8-0
Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill, effective until January 1, 2017, excludes from the
definition of "project" a proposed photovoltaic or wind energy
plant approved on or after the effective date of this bill that
uses an amount of water equal to or less than the amount of
water required by a 250-dwelling-unit project. The effect of
the bill is to exempt a local agency responsible for approving
such a project from the legal obligation to determine there is
adequate water supply available for the project.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible state costs, if any.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author contends that, because wind and solar
energy projects use little water, there is no need to require
a local agency responsible for permitting such a project to
determine an adequate supply of water exists. The author
intends this bill to expedite permitting of such projects, as
well as the economic activity associated with them.
2)Background. Existing statute obligates a local permitting
agency to require the preparation of a water supply assessment
whenever a project under review by the agency is subject to
the California Environmental Protection Act (CEQA). Such an
assessment is to consider whether a proposed project will have
adequate water supply during the next 20 years, given a range
of scenarios. Projects may be challenged in court for failure
to prepare an adequate water supply assessment.
SB 267
Page 2
3)Support. This bill is supported by the County of Kern and the
California Wind Energy Association (cosponsors), who contend
photovoltaic and wind energy project use very little, if any,
water and therefore should not be subject to water supply
assessment.
4)Opposition . This bill is opposed by the Association of
California Water Agencies (ACWA), the East Bay Municipal
Utility District (EBMUD) and the Sierra Club, among others,
who contend it inappropriate to exclude projects from
permitting requirements simply because of the industrial class
of the projects.
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081