BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 306|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 306
          Author:   De León (D)
          Amended:  8/22/11
          Vote:     27 - Urgency

           
           SENATE BUSINESS, PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 5/2/11
          AYES:  Price, Emmerson, Corbett, Correa, Hernandez, Negrete 
            McLeod, Vargas, Walters, Wyland

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR  :  39-0, 5/23/11 (Consent)
          AYES:  Alquist, Anderson, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Calderon, 
            Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Dutton, 
            Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Hancock, Hernandez, 
            Huff, Kehoe, La Malfa, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Lowenthal, 
            Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Rubio, Runner, 
            Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland, Vargas, Walters, Wolk, 
            Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/25/11 (Consent) - See last page 
            for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Accountancy

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill reinstates a five-day safe harbor 
          period that has expired, to allow a temporary California 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 306
                                                                Page 
          2

          practice privilege for certified public accountants 
          licensed in other states. 
          
           Assembly Amendments  provide that an individual holding a 
          valid and current license, certificate, or permit to 
          practice public accountancy from another state is exempt 
          from the requirement to obtain a permit to practice issued 
          by the California Board of Accountancy or to secure a 
          practice privilege if they meet all of the specified 
          requirements, and add an urgency clause.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Licenses and regulates some 40,000 certified public 
             accountants (CPAs) under the Accountancy Act by the 
             California Board of Accountancy (CBA) within the 
             Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA).

          2. Prohibits a person from engaging in the practice of 
             public accountancy in this state unless he or she holds 
             either a valid permit issued by the CBA or a practice 
             privilege, as specified. 

          3. Provides that an individual whose principal place of 
             business is not in this state and who has a valid and 
             current license, certificate or permit to practice 
             public accountancy from another state may, subject to 
             certain conditions and limitations, engage in the 
             practice of public accountancy in California under a 
             practice privilege without obtaining a certificate or 
             license under from the CBA if the individual satisfies 
             one of the following: 

             A.    Has continually practiced public accountancy as a 
                CPA under a valid license issued by any state for 
                four of the last 10 years.

             B.    Holds a license, certificate, or permit from a 
                state which the CBA had determined to have education, 
                examination, and experience qualifications for 
                licensure substantially equivalent to California's 
                requirements.







                                                                SB 306
                                                                Page 
          3


             C.    Possesses education, examination, and experience 
                qualifications which the CBA has determined to be 
                substantially equivalent to this state's 
                qualifications.

          4. Requires, to obtain a practice privilege, an individual 
             who meets the requirements of #3 above must: 

             A.    Notify the CBA of the individual's intent to 
                practice, as specified.

             B.    Pay the required $100 fee. 

          5. Requires the CBA to extend the current "safe harbor" 
             period pertaining to practicing accountancy without a 
             practice privilege for up to five days prior to 
             submitting a notification form to the CBA, from December 
             31, 2007, to December 31, 2010. 

          6. CBA regulation provides:  "During the period January 1, 
             2006, through December 31, 2010, an individual shall not 
             be deemed to be in violation of the practice privilege 
             provisions solely because he or she begins the practice 
             of public accounting in California prior to submitting 
             the Notification Form, provided the Notification Form is 
             submitted within five business days of the date practice 
             begins." 

          This bill:

          1. Provides that an individual shall not be deemed to be in 
             violation of the practice privilege requirements solely 
             because he or she begins practicing as a CPA in 
             California prior to notifying the CBA as required, 
             provided that notice is given to the CBA within five 
             business days.  An individual who properly notifies the 
             CBA within the five day period shall be deemed to have 
             the practice privilege from the first day of practice in 
             California unless that individual fails to submit the 
             required fee to the CBA in a timely manner.

          2. Specifies the following with regard to this provision:








                                                                SB 306
                                                                Page 
          4

             A.    The provision does not apply in those instances in 
                which prior approval by the CBA is required because 
                the individual has a disqualifying condition, as 
                specified.

             B.    Authorizes the CBA, in addition to any other 
                sanction, to impose a fine for notifying the CBA more 
                than five business days after beginning practice in 
                California.

          3. Repeals the obsolete requirement for the CBA to amend a 
             specified regulation to extend the current "safe harbor" 
             period from December 31, 2007, to December 31, 2010.

          4. Provides that an individual holding a valid and current 
             license, certificate, or permit to practice public 
             accountancy from another state is exempt from the 
             requirement to obtain a permit to practice issued by the 
             CBA or to secure a practice privilege if all of the 
             following conditions are satisfied: 

             A.    The individual's client is located in another 
                state.

             B.    The individual's engagement with the client 
                relates to work product to be delivered in another 
                state.

             C.    The individual does not solicit California clients 
                or have their place of business in California.

             D.    The individual does not assert or imply that 
                he/she is licensed to practice public accountancy in 
                California.

             E.    The individual's practice of public accountancy in 
                this state on behalf of the client located in another 
                state is of a limited duration, not extending beyond 
                the period required to service the engagement for the 
                client located in another state.
              
             F.    The individual's practice of public accountancy in 
                this state specifically relates to servicing the 
                engagement for the client located in another state. 







                                                                SB 306
                                                                Page 
          5


           Background  

          California's safe harbor provision which allowed 
          out-of-state CPAs five business days in which to file a 
          Practice Privilege Notification Form following the 
          commencement of practicing in California expired on 
          December 31, 2010.  As a result, a Practice Privilege 
          notification Form must be filed with the CBA prior to 
          practicing public accountancy in the state.  

          Section 5096.14 of the Business and Professions Code was 
          added in 2006 by AB 1868 (Bermudez), Chapter 458, Statutes 
          of 2006, and was intended to give an "introductory" period 
          for out-of-state CPA's to gain familiarity with 
          California's new Practice Privilege requirements.  The safe 
          harbor period was originally set to expire in 2007.  AB 
          1868 required the CBA to extend the safe harbor period to 
          match the sunset date for the Practice Privilege Program in 
          conjunction with Temporary and Incidental provisions which 
          AB 1868 also reinstated.  However, in 2009, SB 819 (Yee), 
          Chapter 308, Statutes of 2009, removed the sunset date, yet 
          the safe harbor period was still treated as "introductory," 
          and was not addressed.  

          The CBA has considered several alternatives to resolve the 
          problem about re-creating the safe harbor period, including 
          pursing regulatory action, adopting emergency regulations, 
          or seeking a statutory solution through legislation.  At 
          the CBA's March meeting, the CBA determined it would 
          support a legislative solution to permanently establish the 
          five-day safe harbor period. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Per Assembly Business, Professions and Consumer 
          Protection Committee analysis of 7/5/11)  (Unable to 
          reverify)

          Deloitte LLP
          Ernst & Young LLP
          Grant Thornton LLP
          KPMG LLP







                                                                SB 306
                                                                Page 
          6

          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Deloitte LLP, Ernst & Young LLP, 
          Grant Thornton LLP, KPMG LLP, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
          support the bill stating that existing law requires that a 
          person practicing public accountancy in California be 
          licensed by the state or have obtained a practice 
          privilege.  This bill allows accountants seeking to 
          practice in California a five-day period in which to notify 
          CBA of their actions through the filing of a practice 
          privilege form.  By rule, CBA has allowed a five day "safe 
          harbor" for filing the practice privilege form, however, 
          the rule sunsetted on December 31, 2010.  This bill 
          reestablishes the five- day filing safe harbor and make 
          these changes permanent.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/25/11
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, 
            Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, 
            Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, 
            Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, 
            Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Grove, 
            Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger 
            Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, 
            Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, 
            Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bonilla, Gorell


          JJA:mw  8/26/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          










                                                                SB 306
                                                                Page 
          7