BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 309
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 28, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
                                Jim Beall Jr., Chair
                      SB 309 (Liu) - As Amended:  June 16, 2011

           SENATE VOTE :  39-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  Child day care facilities:  youth with disabilities

           SUMMARY  :  Allows child day care facilities to serve persons with 
          developmental disabilities who are age 18 to 22 and are enrolled 
          in a special education program under specified conditions.  
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Modifies the definition of "child day care facility" to 
            include a facility that provides nonmedical care to an 
            individual with a developmental disability between 18 and 22 
            years of age if specified conditions are met.

          2)Provides an individual with a developmental disability who is 
            attending a facility with a school-age child care license may 
            continue to attend after the age of 18 if the following 
            conditions are met:

             a)   The individual is enrolled in a special education 
               program and has an individual education plan or an 
               individual transition plan;

             b)   The licensee submits to the Department of Social 
               Services (DSS) a written request for an exception, together 
               with substantiating evidence supporting the request; and,

             c)   DSS provides written approval of the request.

          3)Provides that an individual with a developmental disability 
            who is not attending a school-age child care center upon 
            turning age 18 may attend the facility after the age of 18 if 
            the conditions specified in paragraph 2), above, are met and 
            attending a school-age child care center is specified in the 
            individual program plan (IPP) developed by a regional center 
            for people with developmental disabilities.

          4)Requires an indoor activity space provided for middle school, 
            high school, and transition age youth to be physically 








                                                                  SB 309
                                                                  Page  2

            separated from the space provided for younger, school-age 
            participants.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Under the Education Code, establishes eligibility for special 
            education services for individuals with disabilities who need 
            specialized educational services to benefit from their 
            education.

          2)Provides that individuals remain eligible for special 
            education until they graduate or meet proficiency standards, 
            or until they turn age 22 and for a number of months beyond 
            depending on the individual's birthday.

          3)Under the California Child Day Care Facilities Act (CDCF Act), 
            defines "child day care facility" as a facility that provides 
            nonmedical services to children under age 18.

          4)By regulation, authorizes DSS to approve written requests for 
            facility waivers or individual exceptions to child care center 
            licensing regulations that are supported by substantiating 
            evidence and are not detrimental to the health and safety of 
            any child in care.  22 California Code of Regulations (CCR) 
            Sections 80024; 101175(b).

          5)Under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, 
            establishes 21 regional centers, which contract with the State 
            Department of Developmental Services to provide case 
            management services and arrange for, or purchase, services 
            that meet the needs of individuals with developmental 
            disabilities pursuant to each individual's IPP.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The author points to inconsistencies between the 
          Education Code and the Health and Safety Code as being the basis 
          for this bill.  Young adults who have not yet completed their 
          courses of study are eligible for inclusion in special education 
          programs with minors until they are age 22.  On the other hand, 
          in the world of licensed child day care, 18-year-olds are too 
          old.  The problem comes with care provided to school-aged youth 
          who need extended day care services before and after their 
          special education programs.









                                                                  SB 309
                                                                  Page  3

          The sponsor of this bill, Ability First, has been advised that 
          its child care license is not valid for adults who are still 
          attending a special education program.  To serve this small 
          segment of their population, a separate license-for adult day 
          programs-is required.  Having separate licenses raises questions 
          about whether the two sets of students can be integrated.

          The system of licensure for child day care facilities was 
          established to meet the "unique characteristics and needs of the 
          children served by child day care facilities."  Health & Safety 
          Code Section 1596.72(c).  In enacting the CDCF Act, the 
          Legislature explicitly stated its intent to establish a 
          licensing structure for child day care facilities separate from 
          those facility types administered under the Community Care 
          Facilities Act, which includes, for example, adult day programs 
          serving people with developmental disabilities.  Thus, it is 
          significant that this bill, as most recently amended, includes a 
          mechanism for reviewing requests for exceptions to the age limit 
          for child day care facilities on a case-by-case basis.  A 
          similar process exists to enable children who have not graduated 
          from high school to remain in community treatment 
          facilities-residential programs providing mental health 
          treatment services to children younger than age 18-after they 
          turn 18.  9 CCR Section 1924; 22 CCR Section 80024.

          Reportedly, until recently, DSS regularly reviewed requests for 
          individual exceptions to enable special education students with 
          developmental disabilities to attend child day care facilities.  
          However, DSS' authority to grant individual exceptions or 
          facility waivers applies only to regulatory licensing 
          requirements, not to statutory requirements.  Therefore, that 
          practice was stopped.  This bill would authorize DSS to grant 
          exceptions to the statutory age limit for child day care 
          facilities under conditions specified in the bill.

          It is unlikely that there would be a significant workload impact 
          on DSS as a result of this bill.  DSS reports that there are 
          only approximately 100 individuals in day care facilities 
          statewide who were granted exceptions prior to DSS' recent 
          cessation of that process.  A statutory change might be expected 
          to result in an increase in the number of requests; however, 
          despite the fact that exceptions are no longer being authorized, 
          there does not appear to be a significant unmet need for before 
          or after-school programs for adult special education students 
          with developmental disabilities.  While, for example, many day 








                                                                  SB 309
                                                                  Page  4

          activity programs for adults with developmental disabilities 
          also end around 3:00 p.m., there are other options available for 
          students in need of after-school care or supervision.  Many 
          adults with developmental disabilities live in licensed 
          residential programs or receive supported living services, where 
          supervision is provided.  Others participate in generic 
          community programs (e.g., a YMCA), often with personal 
          assistance staff paid for by their regional center pursuant to 
          the individual's IPP, if necessary.  Other options available 
          pursuant to an individual's regional center IPP could include, 
          for example, socialization or community integration programs, or 
          parent-vouchered day care, in which families are provided with 
          vouchers to purchase in-home day care services.  This bill would 
          simply provide one more potential option.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          AbilityFirst (Sponsor)
          Ala Costa Centers
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees 
          (AFSCME)
          Bolton & Company
          CARS+
          Cass and Johansing
          Developmental Disabilities Area Board 10
          Easter Seals Southern California
          Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center
          Jay Nolan Community Services
          Lawry's Restaurants, Inc.
          Lincoln Training Center
          New Horizons
          PathPoint
          STAPLES Center
          Therapeutic Living Center for the Blind (TLC)
          United Cerebral of Los Angeles, Ventura & Santa Barbara Counties
          Valley Village
          Villa Esperanza Services
          273 Individuals
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file.









                                                                  SB 309
                                                                  Page  5

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Eric Gelber / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089