BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 326
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 25, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 326 (Yee) - As Amended: August 22, 2011
Policy Committee:
JudiciaryVote:10-0 (Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires the Judicial Council to adopt a rule of court
regarding access to court records. Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires the Judicial Council, to adopt, within 18 months, a
rule of court requiring courts to provide same-day public
access to "case-initiating civil and criminal court records,"
as defined, for viewing at the courthouse.
2)Stipulates that, to the extent possible, the adopted rule
provide same-day access for records received within 30 minutes
of the daily court closing, and requires that records be made
available within 60 minutes after the court opens for the next
day.
3)Stipulates that the rules shall allow the court to charge a
nominal fee for providing a copy of records requested at the
courthouse.
FISCAL EFFECT
In the courts most recent statistical report, for 2008-09, court
filings that would be subject, upon request, to the same-day
access under this bill totaled 1.9 million (about 20% of all
filings). Depending on the volume of requests for same-day
access, the courts could incur costs of up to several million
annually for additional staff to meet the bill's requirements.
The Judicial Council indicates that most courts could not comply
with these requirements using current court resources without
diverting staff from other mandated duties. Moreover, the
SB 326
Page 2
2011-12 Budget Act includes $350 million in General Fund
reductions to court operations, further exacerbating this
situation.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . This bill is co-sponsored by Californians Aware,
Courthouse News Service, and the First Amendment Coalition.
Although the public has a well-founded right of access to
court records, the author reports increasing delays in public
access to court records, with some courts apparently delaying
public access for as much as several weeks for newly filed
complaints.
The prior version of the bill would have applied the rule of
court for same-day access to those courts that have fully
implemented the California Case Management System (CCMS). Due
to concerns over the status and implementation of CCMS in
light of court fiscal constraints, the most recent author's
amendments require the same-day access to the records at all
courts if requested at the courthouse, and allow courts to
charge a fee for this service.
2)Opposition . The Judicial Council is opposed for the reasons
discussed in the fiscal effect above.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081