BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                          SB 331 (Padilla)
          
          Hearing Date: 01/19/2012        Amended: 01/13/2012 
          Consultant: Mark McKenzie       Policy Vote: G&F 5-3; Health 6-0
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: SB 331 would prohibit the location of a tobacco 
          retailer within 600 feet of a school, unless the retail location 
          was licensed prior to January 1, 2013, as specified.  The 
          California Department of Public Health (CDPH) would be required 
          to direct the Board of Equalization (BOE) to cancel the license 
          of a retail location found to be in violation of this 
          prohibition.  The bill would also make specified changes to the 
          Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003 in 
          furtherance of this new restriction.
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2012-13      2013-14       2014-15     Fund
           BOE administration     minor and absorbable costs       Special*

          CDPH                   minor costs to coordinate with 
          BOESpecial*
          __________
          * Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund, General Fund, 
          other tobacco tax special funds (see staff comments)
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS:  SUSPENSE FILE.
          
          The Cigarette and Tobacco Licensing Act was established by AB 71 
          (J.Horton), Chapter 890 of 2003, to license and regulate 
          manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, importers, and 
          retailers of cigarette and tobacco products in California.  The 
          Licensing Act is administered by BOE and requires retailers of 
          cigarette and tobacco products to pay a one-time license fee of 
          $100 and annual renewal of the license.  A retailer is subject 
          to a $100 reinstatement fee if they allow the license to expire. 
           Fees collected pursuant to Licensing Act are deposited into the 
          Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and are available 
          solely for the purpose of implementing, enforcing, and 








          SB 331 (Padilla)
          Page 1


          administering the Act.  BOE indicates that there are currently 
          36,612 licensed retailers.  Each year approximately 6,000 new 
          licenses are issued, but a corresponding number are typically 
          surrendered, so the total number of active licenses has been 
          fairly stable since the Licensing Act was established in 2003.

          Existing law requires CDPH to take primary responsibility for 
          enforcement of the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement 
          (STAKE) Act, a statewide regulatory program established by SB 
          1927 (Hayden), Chapter 1009 of 1994, to allow enforcement action 
          to be taken against businesses that illegally sell tobacco 
          products to minors.  Penal Code Section 308 makes it a violation 
          to sell or furnish cigarettes or tobacco products to minors.  
          BOE is required to warn, suspend, or revoke a retailer's license 
          for sales to underage persons or related offenses under the 
          following circumstances:
                 First conviction: warning letter and training 
               requirement.
                 Second conviction in 12 months: $500 fine
                 Third conviction in 12 months: $1000 fine
                 Fourth to seventh conviction in 12 months: 90-day 
               suspension of license
                 Eighth conviction in 24 months: revocation of license.
          BOE's authority to suspend or revoke a license for underage 
          sales violations is limited to periods when the underage sales 
          rate in California is 13% or more, as measured in an annual 
          Youth Tobacco Survey conducted by CDPH.

          SB 331 would create a new violation of the STAKE Act by 
          prohibiting the location of new tobacco retail locations within 
          600 feet of a public or private elementary or secondary school, 
          unless a retail location is licensed prior to January 1, 2013.  
          The bill would require CDPH to direct BOE to cancel a tobacco 
          retailer license issued in violation of this prohibition, and to 
          provide BOE with all relevant information relevant to enable the 
          cancellation of the license.  BOE would cancel the license after 
          providing notice to the licensee.

          The bill would also require BOE's tobacco retailer license 
          application to include a statement by the applicant affirming 
          that each retail location for which a license is sought is 
          located 600 feet or more from a school.  BOE would deny the 
          issuance of a new license on or after January 1, 2013 if the 
          application does not include this affirmation.  A license issued 








          SB 331 (Padilla)
          Page 2


          on or after this date would be cancelled by BOE if the 
          application is incorrect or incomplete, or the license was 
          issued in error. 

          BOE indicates that costs to implement the bill would be minor 
          and absorbable and attributable to revising applications and 
          publications, developing procedures for license cancellation, 
          and staff time associated with license cancellation appeals.  In 
          addition, CDPH costs to coordinate with BOE would be minor and 
          absorbable.

           Compliance Fund deficiencies
           Up until 2005-06, all BOE costs to enforce and administer the 
          Licensing Act were fully covered by license fee revenues, 
          penalties, and fines deposited into the Compliance Fund.  
          However, since the retail license revenues were predominantly a 
          one-time revenue gain, the Compliance Fund does not have 
          sufficient revenues to cover BOE's ongoing costs.  In 2009-10, 
          for example, revenues deposited into the Compliance Fund totaled 
          $648,000, while BOE's costs to administer and enforce the 
          Licensing Act were approximately $8.3 million.  The difference 
          between revenues and costs were offset with $883,000 in General 
          Fund revenues as well as the following tobacco tax revenues: 
          $176,000 Breast Cancer Fund; $2.2 million Cigarette and Tobacco 
          Products Surtax Fund (Proposition 99); and $4.4 million from the 
          California Children and Families First Trust Fund (Proposition 
          10).  To the extent that SB 331 results in the issuance of fewer 
          new licenses and less convenience for consumers, there could be 
          a minor loss in excise tax and license fee revenues.

          Staff notes that the bill currently contains an ambiguity.  
          Specifically, while a retail location that has been licensed 
          prior to January 1, 2013 is exempt from the prohibition in the 
          bill, it appears that the bill would prevent the issuance of a 
          new license for a previously licensed location if there is a 
          change in ownership at a retail location within 600 feet of a 
          school.  When concerns about this issue were raised in the 
          Senate Health Committee, the author committed to resolve this 
          ambiguity after the hearing.  Staff recommends that Section 
          22973.1(a)(5) of the Business and Professions Code (page 6, 
          lines 23-30) be amended to read:

               (5) The application is for a new license issued on or after 
               January 1, 2013, for a retail location that is subject to 








          SB 331 (Padilla)
          Page 3


               the prohibition of subdivision (b) of Section 22960.5 and 
               that the applicant does not affirm is located 600 feet or 
               more from a public or private elementary or secondary 
               school, as required under paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) 
               of Section 22973.  This paragraph shall not be construed to 
               prohibit the renewal or reinstatement of a license issued 
               prior to January 1, 2013 for a retail location that is 
               within 600 feet of any school, or the issuance of a new 
               license for a retail location that was licensed to a 
               previous owner for the same location prior to January 1, 
               2013.

          BOE notes that there would likely be new unabsorbable costs 
          associated with allowing a new license for a retail location for 
          which a license was issued to a previous owner prior to January 
          1, 2013.  The magnitude of these costs are unknown at this time.

          Staff notes that SB 601 (Padilla), which was held on this 
          Committee's Suspense File in 2009, would have prohibited BOE 
          from issuing a new cigarette and tobacco products license for a 
          retail location within 600 feet of a school, unless public 
          convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance, as 
          specified.  That bill would have placed significant 
          administrative burdens on BOE related to determining the 
          proximity of an applicant's retail location to schools, among 
          other things.  SB 331 takes a less burdensome approach by 
          requiring license applicant's to self-certify that a retail 
          location is not near a school, and allowing for the cancellation 
          of a license if CDPH determines that a license was issued for a 
          retailer in violation of the prohibition.