BILL ANALYSIS �
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 386|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 386
Author: Harman (R)
Amended: 4/25/11
Vote: 27 - Urgency
SENATE NATURAL RES. & WATER COMMITTEE : 9-0, 4/26/11
AYES: Pavley, La Malfa, Cannella, Evans, Fuller, Kehoe,
Padilla, Simitian, Wolk
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8
SUBJECT : State parks: proposed closures: public notice
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill requires Department of Parks and
Recreation (DPR) to post on its Web site, at least 30 days
before closure, the name of a park intended to be closed,
the approximate date of closure, and DPR contact
information for any organization who may be interested in a
contract to lease, operate, maintain, or provide a
concession at park listed for closure. This bill also
requires DPR to respond to the inquiry in writing.
ANALYSIS : Existing law authorizes the DPR to enter into
agreements between DPR and federal and local governments
and other public agencies for the care, maintenance,
administration, and control of lands under the jurisdiction
of any party to this agreement for the purpose of the state
park system, as prescribed.
CONTINUED
SB 386
Page
2
This bill requires DPR to post on its Web site, at least 30
days before closure, the name of a park intended to be
closed, the approximate date of closure, and DPR contact
information for any organization who may be interested in a
contract to lease, operate, maintain, or provide a
concession at park listed for closure. This bill requires
DPR to respond to the inquiry in writing.
Background
Section 5002.2 of the Public Resources Code requires the
DPR to develop a general plan for each state park unit.
The general plan is meant to serve as the guide for future
development, management, and operation of the park unit and
must have elements regarding proposed land uses,
facilities, concessions, operations, and resource
management. The general plan for each park unit must be
approved by the State Park and Recreation Commission
(SPRC).
Article 1 (commencing with Section 5080.30) allows DPR to
enter into an agreement with federal or local public
agencies for the care, maintenance, administration, and
control of any state parks. Any park unit subject to such
an operating agreement must have a general plan that
specifically addresses how the unit is to be operated. The
SPRC must determine that, according to the general plan,
the unit will be operated in a manner that is consistent
with DPR's management of similar parks, provides for
satisfactory park resource management, and enhances the
general public use and enjoyment of recreational and
educational experiences at the unit. The public agency
must use revenues received at the park unit for the
operation, maintenance, or improvement of that park unit.
Any excess revenues must be given to DPR.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
OPPOSITION : (Verified 5/9/11)
American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees, AFL-CIO
SB 386
Page
3
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author:
"SB 386 does not expand the existing authority of the
Department of Parks to enter into contracts, nor does it
require the department to enter into contracts. It
simply sets notification requirements that must be met by
the Department of Parks before a single park may be
closed. Specifically, it requires the department to
notify the public of park closures and of how an
interested entity can contact the department to express
their interest in entering into a contract. SB 386 would
also require the department to respond to inquiries in
writing.
"The department has alternative mechanisms to keep state
parks open and operating other than closure. For
instance, many local and federal entities partner with
local governments, the private sector to operate and
maintain public parks and recreation areas that might
otherwise close. State law currently allows the
department to employ similar measures. The bill simply
adds transparency to existing alternatives."
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, opposes this bill
and writes:
"Senate Bill 386 would require the Department of Parks
and Recreation to, at least 30 days prior to closing a
unit of the state park system, post a notice on its
website that includes the name of the unit and the
proposed date of closure. This notice must also include
information about how to contact the Department about
entering into negotiations for a contract or agreement to
lease, operate, maintain, or provide concessions at a
unit proposed for closure.
"Because of the vague language in SB 386, it is unclear
whether the required notice will be limited to the
concession activities within closed state parks or if it
will allow for non-government entities to take over
operation of a park. Under current law, non-governmental
agencies are limited to concession activities - a limit
SB 386
Page
4
that is important to keep in place to avoid the
privatization of California's parks. Rather than trying
to contract out our state parks, the Legislature should
focus its efforts on providing state funding to keep the
parks open."
CTW:kc 5/9/11 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****