BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: SB 415
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  price
                                                         VERSION: 
          8/21/2012
          Analysis by:  Art Bauer                        FISCAL:  Yes
          Hearing date:  August 28, 2012



          SUBJECT:

          State highway relinquishments

          DESCRIPTION:

          The bill authorizes the California Transportation Commission 
          (CTC) to relinquish park-and- ride lots to county transportation 
          commissions or regional transportation planning agencies, 
          provided the agencies agree to the terms and conditions 
          established by the CTC. 

          ANALYSIS:

          Existing law:

               Identifies the California state highway system through a 
              description of segments of the state's regional and 
              interregional roads that the Department of Transportation 
              (Caltrans) owns and operates.

               Provides that any expansion or deletion of the state 
              highway system occurs through a statutory process requiring 
              the CTC to make findings that it is in the best interest of 
              the state to include or delete a specified portion of 
              roadway from the system.

           This bill  authorizes the CTC to relinquish park-and-ride lots to 
          county transportation commissions and regional transportation 
          planning agencies provided the agencies agree to the CTC's terms 
          and conditions, and agree not to diminish the number of parking 
          spaces in the park-and-ride lots. 

          COMMENTS:

              1.   Purpose  .  Caltrans has established Park-and-ride lots 
               throughout the state as sites where individuals can park 




          SB 415 (PRICE)                                         Page 2

                                                                       


               their cars and form car pools or meet buses for their 
               journey to and from work.  The purpose of the lots is to 
               encourage ride sharing or the use of buses. 

               The purpose of this bill is to establish a procedure for 
               transferring park-and-ride lots to regional agencies that 
               may wish to assume the management of the state developed 
               lots.

              2.   Background  .  The Los Angeles County Metropolitan 
               Transportation Authority (MTA), a county transportation 
               commission and the sponsor of this bill, has observed that 
               Caltrans park-and-ride lots are not well maintained.  
               According to MTA, the lots frequently have an accumulation 
               of litter, poor lighting, and directional signs are often 
               in disrepair. In addition, the lots, in some instances, may 
               present untapped joint development opportunities. 

               Caltrans currently operates 320 park-and-ride lots with 
               65,886 parking spaces throughout California.  Of these, 
               Caltrans owns 207 lots with 24,377 parking spaces.  
               Nineteen of the Caltrans-owned lots with 3,812 spaces are 
               located beneath bridges and elevated freeways and are 
               ineligible for relinquishment, leaving 188 lots with 20,565 
               spaces throughout the state potentially eligible for 
               relinquishment.

               In Los Angeles County, Caltrans currently owns and operates 
               41 park-and-ride lots with 10,475 spaces.  Ten of these 
               lots with 2,354 spaces are located beneath bridges and 
               elevated freeways and are ineligible for relinquishment, 
               leaving 31 lots with 8,121 spaces potentially eligible for 
               relinquishment.

               Under existing law, the CTC may enter into a lease 
               agreement with a public agency and lease the space under 
               bridges and elevate freeways to be used as a park-and-ride 
               facility.

              3.   Issues  .  The relinquishment of a state highway or a 
               segment of a highway is a three-step process.  Because 
               state highways are defined in statue, legislation must 
               authorize the CTC to relinquish a segment of highway.  
               Typically, a relinquishment bill requires that the local 
               agency assuming responsibility for the state highway to 
               agree not to return the highway to the state.  The second 




          SB 415 (PRICE)                                         Page 3

                                                                       


               step is the negotiation of the specific terms and 
               conditions of the relinquishment between Caltrans and the 
               local agency seeking control of the highway.  The third 
               step requires the CTC to confirm the agreement between 
               Caltrans and the local agency by enacting a resolution 
               authorizing the relinquishment. This action deletes the 
               highway from the state highway system. 

               The one exception to the requirement for specific 
               legislation authorizing a relinquishment is when a state 
               highway is relocated to a newly constructed alignment.  The 
               pre-existing highway may be relinquished to a city or 
               county by action of the CTC.  Because park-and-ride lots 
               are not specified in statue, their relinquishment will not 
               require legislative review. 

              4.   Flaw in SB 415  .  This bill does not preclude a county 
               transportation commission or a regional transportation 
               planning agency from returning park-and-ride lots to 
               Caltrans after it has assumed responsibility for the lots 
               through relinquishment.  In the future, a local agency may 
               decide, perhaps as a cost saving measure, to return the 
               lots it manages back to Caltrans.  To be sure, Caltrans may 
               require, as a condition for relinquishment, a local agency 
               to stipulate that it will not return the lot to the state.  
               If this is not mandated, it is unclear that a consistent 
               state policy may be developed regarding the return of the 
               lots to Caltrans. 

                Next year the author may wish to sponsor an amendment 
               requiring local agencies to agree to not returning the lot 
               to the state. Perhaps this amendment could be included in 
               next session's omnibus bill.  
           
              5.   Concurrence hearing  .  This bill was referred to the 
               committee under Senate Rule 29.10 in order for the 
               committee to review the new subject matter of this bill.  
               On a concurrence hearing such as this, the committee may 
               only take one of two actions: 1) hold the bill; or 2) 
               return the bill to the Senate Floor for concurrence in 
               Assembly amendments.  

          Assembly Votes:
               Floor:    79-0
               Appr: 17-0
               Trans:    13-0




          SB 415 (PRICE)                                         Page 4

                                                                       


               Rules:    11-0

          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on 
          Monday, August 27, 2012)                                    
               SUPPORT:  Los Angeles County Transportation Metropolitan 
                         Transportation Authority (sponsor)

               OPPOSED:  None received.