BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 416|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 416
          Author:   Kehoe (D)
          Amended:  8/26/11
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE  :  7-5, 3/22/11
          AYES:  Wright, Calderon, Corbett, De Le�n, Evans, Padilla, 
            Yee
          NOES:  Anderson, Berryhill, Cannella, Strickland, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hernandez

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-2, 5/26/11
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Pavley, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Runner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Emmerson 

           SENATE FLOOR  :  25-14, 6/1/11
          AYES:  Alquist, Calderon, Corbett, Correa, De Le�n, 
            DeSaulnier, Evans, Hancock, Hernandez, Kehoe, Leno, Lieu, 
            Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, 
            Rubio, Simitian, Steinberg, Vargas, Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES:  Anderson, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Cannella, Dutton, 
            Emmerson, Fuller, Gaines, Harman, Huff, La Malfa, 
            Strickland, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  53-26, 9/8/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Health: survey

           SOURCE  :     Equality California
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 416
                                                                Page 
          2



           DIGEST  :    This bill requires, not later than January 1, 
          2015, the Department of Public Health and the Department of 
          Health Care Services to collaborate with the University of 
          California, to include specified information related to 
          gender into the California Health Interview Survey.  This 
          bill requires, no later than January 1, 2015, the above 
          departments to collaborate with the California state 
          coordinator for the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance 
          System to include specified information related to gender 
          into the system.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) change the date of January 1, 2013, 
          to not later than January 1, 2015; and (2) requires the 
          state department to collaborate with the University of 
          California Regents instead of University of California, Los 
          Angeles.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law creates the Department of Public 
          Health and requires it to carry out various duties related 
          to public health programs.  Existing law creates the State 
          department of Health Care Services and requires it to carry 
          out various duties related to health purchasing programs.

          This bill requires, not later than January 1, 2015, the 
          Department of Public Health and the Department of Health 
          Care Services to collaborate with the University of 
          California, to include specified information related to 
          gender into the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS).  
          This bill requires, no later than January 1, 2015, the 
          above departments to collaborate with the California state 
          coordinator for the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance 
          System (BRFSS) to include specified information related to 
          gender into the system.

           Comments
           
          According to the sponsors, Equality California, data 
          relating to California's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and 
          Transgender (LGBT) population is not being currently 
          collected in a consistent manner by the state or federal 
          government.  Equality California (EQCA) contends that a 
          growing body of research has documented that LGBT people 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 416
                                                                Page 
          3

          differ from the general population in terms of income, 
          poverty rates, public benefit program participation, mental 
          health, physical health, victimization, and employment 
          discrimination.  EQCA points out that the state currently 
          administers a number of statewide surveys that collect 
          important information about Californians.  Specifically, 
          according to EQCA, CHIS, the nation's largest state health 
          survey gives a detailed picture of the health and 
          healthcare needs of California's large and diverse 
          population, and the BRFSS, a federal survey administered by 
          the state, has tracked health conditions and risk behaviors 
          in the United States since 1984.  The sponsors point out 
          that although these and other studies collect demographic 
          information such as race/ethnic identity, age, family size, 
          health and safety information, and other data, they do not 
          include questions about LGBT people in a manner that allows 
          for uniform compilation and reporting. 

          CHIS is conducted by University of California, Los Angeles, 
          Center for Health Policy Research in collaboration with the 
          Department of Public Health and Department of Health Care 
          Services (DHCS) every two years.  CHIS conducts random-dial 
          telephone interviews with up to 50,000 or more California 
          households in 44 geographic areas in California and claims 
          to be the nation's largest state health survey.  It is 
          funded by a variety of public agencies and private 
          organizations such as DPH, DHCS, California Children and 
          Families Commission, the California HealthCare Foundation, 
          and the California Endowment.  The persons included in CHIS 
          are a statistically representative sample of the entire 
          state's diverse population.  According to CHIS, the survey 
          covers dozens of essential health topics, from asthma, 
          diabetes, and obesity to immigrant health and the number of 
          Californians with health insurance.  Many core questions 
          are repeated in each survey in order to measure significant 
          shifts over time.  New questions are also added each survey 
          year to address emerging concerns that are important for 
          planning and policy development.  In 2009, CHIS included 
          questions in the category of "Respondent Characteristics" 
          that asked about sexual orientation, registered domestic 
          partner, and the gender of the spouse.  

          The BRFSS is a state-based system of health surveys that 
          generate information about health risk behaviors, clinical 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 416
                                                                Page 
          4

          preventive practices, and health care access and use 
          primarily related to chronic diseases and injury.  
          Conducted by the 50 state health departments as well as 
          those in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and 
          the U.S. Virgin Islands with support from the Centers for 
          Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), BRFSS provides 
          state-specific information about issues such as asthma, 
          diabetes, health care access, alcohol use, hypertension, 
          obesity, cancer screening, nutrition and physical activity, 
          tobacco use, and more.  According to the CDC, it is the 
          world's largest, on-going telephone health survey system, 
          tracking health conditions and risk behaviors in the United 
          States yearly since 1984.  Federal, state, and local health 
          officials and researchers use this information to track 
          health risks, identify emerging problems, prevent disease, 
          and improve treatment.  

          The BRFSS questionnaire is developed each year by CDC in 
          collaboration with participating state agencies.  Wherever 
          possible questions are selected from previously conducted 
          national surveys for comparability.  The questionnaire has 
          three components.  The first component consists of a core 
          set of questions that are administered by all states 
          participating in the BRFSS collection effort.  Many of the 
          core questions have remained fixed from year to year, 
          although revisions are made to the core annually.  Changes 
          are implemented at the beginning of each interviewing year. 
           From 1992-1999 CDC implemented a "rotating core" strategy, 
          allowing some core questions to appear on the questionnaire 
          in alternate years only.  The second component of the 
          questionnaire consists of a series of topical modules 
          developed by the CDC.  States have the option of adding as 
          many modules as they wish to the core questionnaire each 
          year.  California has used several of the CDC modules, 
          although the same modules have not been used consistently 
          across all years of the survey.  The final component of the 
          questionnaire consists of questions designed and 
          administered by individual states to address issues of 
          local concern.  These have been revised annually in 
          California to address the needs of as many programs as 
          possible.  BRFSS includes a California specific question to 
          determine whether California will yield results consistent 
          with other research that has shown sexual minority 
          community members have important health risk factors, such 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 416
                                                                Page 
          5

          as smoking.  As with CHIS, the author's intent is to ensure 
          that questions include gender identity and gender 
          expression in a manner that is most likely to elicit 
          uniform, useful, and accurate information.  In addition, 
          the BRFSS question on marital status does not ask the 
          gender of the spouse or partner and will therefore not 
          provide data that can be compared using this distinction.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, (1) 
          annual General Fund (GF) costs in the range of $7,000 to 
          $20,000 to include additional questions on the BRFSS; (2) 
          unknown annual ongoing costs, at least $50,000, and 
          potentially exceeding $180,000 per two-year cycle (50% 
          GF/50% federal), to include additional survey questions on 
          CHIS; and (3) actual costs will depend on the number of 
          people receiving the questions, amount of time it takes to 
          ask and answer the questions, and whether some of the 
          questions would be included regardless of this bill.  The 
          first two factors relate to a lack of a well-validated and 
          generally accepted set of telephone survey questions.  Some 
          of the questions, such as a question on sexual orientation, 
          would likely be included in both surveys even in the 
          absence of this bill; the inclusion of other questions, 
          even those that were included in 2009 surveys, is less 
          certain.  Additionally, gender identity and expression are 
          complex constructs and may take additional time to clarify 
          if people are unfamiliar with what is being asked, which 
          could further increase costs beyond the estimates presented 
          here.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/8/11)

          Equality California (source)
          American Civil Liberties Union
          BIENESTAR Human Services, Inc.
          California Communities United Institute
          California NOW
          California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
          City of Los Angeles
          Gay-Straight Alliance Network
          Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 416
                                                                Page 
          6

          Mental Health America of Northern California
          National Association of Social Workers - California Chapter
          Openhouse
          Planned Parenthood
          The Trevor Project
          Transgender Law Center

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Proponents state that, "In an 
          environment of limited resources, it is critically 
          important that the State of California collect information 
          that allows those limited resources to be focused on doing 
          the most good at the lowest cost." 


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  53-26, 9/8/11
          AYES:  Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, 
            Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, 
            Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, 
            Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Gatto, Gordon, Hall, 
            Hayashi, Roger Hern�ndez, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, 
            Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, 
            Pan, Perea, V. Manuel P�rez, Portantino, Skinner, 
            Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, 
            Beth Gaines, Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Harkey, 
            Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, 
            Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Smyth, Valadao, 
            Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Gorell


          PQ:do  9/9/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          






                                                           CONTINUED