BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 453 (Correa)
Hearing Date: 05/16/2011 Amended: 05/04/2011
Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Education 7-0
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 453 would expand the definition of bullying to
include acts motivated by specified actual or perceived
characteristics of the victim. This bill adds bullying, as
specified, to the list of acts for which expulsion may be
recommended; this bill adds "persistent bullying", as defined,
to the list of acts for which expulsion shall be recommended by
a principal, as specified. This bill requires school safety
plans to include policies and procedures relating to bullying,
as specified.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13
2013-14 Fund
Mandate: Expulsions Significant
reimbursable costs General*
Mandate: Safety Plans Potentially substantial
reimbursable costs General*
*Counts toward meeting the Proposition 98 minimum funding
guarantee
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the
Suspense File.
Existing law prohibits the suspension or the recommendation of a
pupil for expulsion from school unless a school district
superintendent or school principal determines that the pupil has
committed certain specified acts, including having engaged in an
act of bullying. Existing law defines bullying to include an
act of sexual harassment or hate violence, threats or
intimidation directed against school pupils or personnel, or
bullying committed by electronic means, as specified.
SB 453 (Correa)
Page 1
(Education Code � 48900)
This bill expands the definition of bullying to include acts
motivated by specified actual or perceived characteristics of
the victim. The degree to which this additional specification of
what constitutes bullying is actually an expansion of the
definition is unclear. Because the definition applies to
offenses for which a pupil may be recommended for suspension of
expulsion, this provision is not a mandate.
Existing law requires a principal or a superintendent of schools
to recommend the expulsion of a pupil who commits specified acts
at school or a school activity off grounds, unless the principal
or the superintendent finds the expulsion to be inappropriate
due to the particular circumstance. (EC � 48915)
This bill would add to the list of existing acts for which pupil
expulsion must be recommended (unless the principal specifically
finds that it is inappropriate) persistent bullying, as defined
in the bill. An expulsion recommendation triggers the beginning
of an administrative process (including hearings and potential
appeals) for determining the disposition of the pupil. This
provision expands a reimbursable mandate on school districts;
the state currently reimburses school districts for expulsion
activities.
In 2008-09, there were 20,833 expulsions statewide and the state
reimbursed school districts $6.3 million in expulsion mandate
costs. This bill expands the offenses for which expulsion must
be recommended and, thus, is likely to result in more expulsion
activities and mandate claims. If the number of expulsions
increases by 1% statewide, the mandate costs would likely
increase by approximately $63,000.
This bill also requires that "as comprehensive school safety
plans are reviewed and updated, all plans, to the extent that
resources are available, shall include the policies and
procedures relating to bullying listed in subdivision (b) of
Section 32286.5." This cross-referenced provision lists policies
and procedures to: (1) protect students against bullying; (2)
establish a process for advocates to assist parents and victims;
(3) inform teachers and other staff of best practices related to
bullying prevention and intervention; and (4) provide
information to pupils on bullying prevention and intervention.
SB 453 (Correa)
Page 2
The Commission on State Mandates, upon receiving a test claim,
would likely determine that this provision constitutes an
additional mandate on schools. Such a mandate could cost the
state millions of dollars in reimbursements for updating school
safety plans, as specified, and performing other specified
activities to prevent and intervene in bullying.