BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 457
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 17, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 457 (Calderon) - As Amended: June 28, 2011
Policy Committee: InsuranceVote:10
- 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires that the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
reimburse for all benefits and services paid by a health
insurance plan, group disability policy, hospital service
contract, or a self-insured employee welfare benefit plan that
should have been covered by workers compensation insurance, even
if those costs are in excess of the official medical fee
schedule (OMFS).
FISCAL EFFECT
The state's share of medical spending for workers compensation
is in excess of $200 million per year. If this legislation
results in a one or two percent increase in those costs, it
would cost the state somewhere between $2 million and $5 million
per year (GF and SF).
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . According to the sponsor, the California Professional
Firefighters, if an employer or its insurer denies a workers'
compensation claim, case law requires a non-industrial health
program that is otherwise available to the employee to provide
coverage. The law allows that health plan to file a lien to
recover its costs "to the extent of benefits paid" in the
event the injury is later determined to be work-related.
However, the amount the health plan may have paid in treatment
may be greater than the OMFS, and thus the health plan faces a
loss of the difference between what it paid, and what the OMFS
covers. The bill is intended to close this loophole.
SB 457
Page 2
2)Workers' Compensation Coverage . The State of California, as an
employer, and many cities and counties are self-insured for
workers' compensation claims. Payments are treated in a pay as
you go manner. Therefore, any increase in costs has a direct
impact on state and local funds. For non-self-insured
employers, premiums are paid through a private insurer or the
State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF). Increased costs for
these employers would be evidenced through potentially higher
premiums.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081