BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 459
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 459 (Corbett)
          As Amended  September 2, 2011
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :24-12  
           
           LABOR & EMPLOYMENT     4-2      JUDICIARY           6-3         
               
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Swanson, Allen, Furutani, |Ayes:|Feuer, Atkins, Dickinson, |
          |     |Yamada                    |     |Huber, Monning,           |
          |     |                          |     |Wieckowski                |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Morrell, Beth Gaines      |Nays:|Wagner, Beth Gaines,      |
          |     |                          |     |Jones                     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford, Charles         |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |     |                          |
          |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Solorio         |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, Norby, Wagner    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY :  Enacts a number of provisions of law related to the 
          classification (or misclassification) of individuals as 
          independent contractors.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Makes it unlawful for any person or employer to engage in any 
            of the following activities:

             a)   Willful misclassification of an individual as an 
               independent contractor.  ("Willful misclassification" is 
               defined as avoiding employee status for an individual by 
               voluntarily and knowingly misclassifying that individual as 
               an independent contractor); and,








                                                                  SB 459
                                                                 Page  2


             b)   Charging an individual who has been willfully 
               misclassified a fee, or making any deductions from 
               compensation for any purpose, where the employer would have 
               been in violation of the law if the individual had not been 
               misclassified.

          2)Provides that any person found guilty of the above violations 
            shall be assessed a civil penalty of not less than $5,000 and 
            not more than $15,000 for each violation.

          3)Provides that any person found guilty of a repeated pattern or 
            practice of these violations shall be assessed a civil penalty 
            of not less than $10,000 and not more than $25,000 for each 
            violation.

          4)Authorizes the Labor Commissioner to issue a determination 
            that a person or employer has violated the provisions related 
            to willful misclassification.

          5)Authorizes the Labor Commissioner to issue a citation to 
            assess specified damages in addition to any other penalties or 
            damages otherwise available at law.

          6)Authorizes the Labor Commissioner to enforce these provisions 
            administratively or in a civil suit.

          7)Provides that a person or employer that violates the above 
            provisions shall be required to post a notice on its website 
            (or at the worksite if no Web site exists) that sets forth 
            specified information for a one-year period of time.

          8)Provides that if a licensed contractor engages in the 
            violations specified above that resulted in debarment, a 
            certified copy shall be sent to the Contractor's State License 
            Board, which shall initiate disciplinary action against the 
            licensee within 30 days.  

          9)Provides that any penalty issued under this bill shall be in 
            effect against any successor that has one or more of the same 
            principals or officers and is engaged in the same or similar 
            line of business.

          10)Provides that a person who knowingly advises an employer to 
            treat an individual as an independent contractor and to avoid 








                                                                  SB 459
                                                                  Page  3

            employee status for that individual shall be jointly and 
            severally liable if the individual is found not to be an 
            independent contractor.  This provision does not apply to:  a) 
            a person who provides advice to his or her employer; or, b) a 
            licensed attorney who provides legal advice in the course of 
            the practice of law.

          11)Makes other related and conforming changes.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, this bill will result in minor and absorbable costs 
          to the Employment Development Department to implement this 
          measure.

           COMMENTS  :  This bill is the latest attempt in an ongoing effort 
          to develop legislation to combat the misclassification of 
          employees as independent contractors.  Legislation in recent 
          years has addressed most of the individual components contained 
          in this bill.  However, this bill takes a more comprehensive 
          approach and attempts to address each of these elements in one 
          measure.

          The sponsors of this bill argue that when a worker is 
          misclassified, he or she loses more than just minimum wage and 
          overtime protections.  He or she has no workers' compensation 
          coverage if injured on the job, no right to family leave when a 
          loved one is ill, and no unemployment insurance if he or she 
          loses his or her job.  If he or she does not like the working 
          conditions and tries to join with others to ask for more pay or 
          a safer workplace, he or she has no legal right to organize or 
          join a union and no protection against employer retaliation.  
          They contend that the use and abuse of independent contractors 
          poses a serious threat to workers' rights and undermines working 
          conditions for all workers.  It creates an unfair playing field 
          for all the responsible employers who continue to honor their 
          lawful obligations to their employees.

          The sponsors argue that the only way to effectively stop 
          misclassification is to create real economic disincentives.  
          This bill will help enforcement efforts and act as a deterrent 
          and, in doing so; it will level the playing field for 
          responsible businesses and protect vulnerable workers.

          A coalition of employer groups opposes this bill, arguing that 
          determining the status of a person as an independent contractor 








                                                                  SB 459
                                                                  Page  4

          versus an employee is daunting for many businesses because the 
          process is so ambiguous and complex and provides no certainty 
          for decision-making.  Instead of imposing new requirements and 
          liabilities regarding independent contractors, the process 
          should look to ways in which to improve the ability of business 
          to make accurate and sound business decisions regarding the 
          classifications of their employees.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 


                                                               FN: 0002582