BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 491
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 28, 2011

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
                                  Mike Feuer, Chair
                     SB 491 (Evans) - As Amended:  March 25, 2011

                                  PROPOSED CONSENT

           SENATE VOTE  :   40-0

           SUBJECT :  Civil Procedure: Probate of Wills

           KEY ISSUE  :  SHOULD THE PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING A SUMMONS WHEN 
          SOMEONE OBJECTS TO THE PROBATE OF A WILL BE CLARIFIED TO BE 
          CONSISTENT WITH THE ISSUANCE OF OTHER CIVIL SUMMONSES? 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  As currently in print this bill is keyed 
          non-fiscal.

                                      SYNOPSIS

          This non-controversial bill clarifies procedural issues when 
          someone objects to the probate of a will.  Existing law requires 
          a person contesting a will to file an objection with the court 
          to the probate of the will, and requires that a summons be 
          issued and served, with a copy of the objection, on specified 
          persons.  This bill clarifies that the general civil provisions 
          that authorize a clerk to issue a summons are applicable when a 
          person files an objection to the probate of a will.

           SUMMARY  :  Clarifies that the summons relating to an objection to 
          the probate of a will must be issued as provided in the chapter 
          of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) generally relating to 
          summonses.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides that when a will is contested, as specified, a 
            contestant shall file with the court an objection to probate 
            of the will.  Provides, thereafter, that a summons shall be 
            issued and served, with a copy of the objection, on the 
            persons required to be served with the notice of hearing of a 
            petition for administration of the decedent's estate.  
            (Probate Code Section 8250.) 









                                                                  SB 491
                                                                  Page  2

          2)Requires the above summons to be both issued and served as 
            provided in the chapter of the CCP which relates to service, 
            but not issuance, of summonses.  (Probate Code Section 8250; 
            Code of Civil Procedure Section 413.10 et seq.)  

          3)Provides for the issuance of civil summonses pursuant to 
            specified criteria.  (CCP Section 412.10 et seq.) 

           COMMENTS  :  Under existing law, an interested person may commence 
          proceedings for the administration of the estate of a deceased 
          individual by submitting a petition to the court.  The petition 
          may include a request for appointment of a personal 
          representative, probate of the decedent's will, or both.  If the 
          will is contested, the contestant must file an objection to the 
          probate of the will with the court, and the court must issue and 
          serve a summons on interested individuals with a notice of 
          hearing of a petition for administration of the decedent's 
          estate.  

          Existing law states that the above summons must be both issued 
          and served as provided in the Code of Civil Procedure sections 
          relating to service of summons.  To remove confusion regarding 
          the process for issuing and serving the summons in these cases, 
          this non-controversial bill clarifies that their issuance must 
          comply with specific provisions of the CCP regarding the 
          issuance of summons.

          According to the author, this bill conforms "the statute to the 
          legislature's stated intent . . . that the Code of Civil 
          Procedure's provisions concerning both the issuance and service 
          of summons is applicable to will contests and to revocation of 
          probate proceedings."

           The Bill Clarifies the Appropriate Cross Reference  :  The Probate 
          Code currently provides that the summons for challenging a will 
          shall be "issued and served" according to the CCP sections 
          relating only to "service" of summons.  This bill clarifies that 
          provision, instead, to state that the summons shall be issued 
          and served in accordance with the CCP chapters relating to 
          issuance  and  service of summonses.

          Although arguably technical, it should be noted that the 
          inclusion of additional CCP sections has policy implications due 
          to the requirement imposed by CCP Section 412.10, and applicable 
          to the will contest case as a result of this bill, that the 








                                                                  SB 491
                                                                  Page  3

          clerk keep "each original summons in the court records and 
          provide a copy of each summons issued to the plaintiff who 
          requested issuance of the summons."  That requirement, enacted 
          by AB 496 (Aghazarian, Chap. 300, Stats. 2005), sought to 
          address problems caused as a result of court clerks returning 
          the original summons to the plaintiff (after signing and 
          stamping the document) for service on the defendant.  Once the 
          defendant had been served with a copy of the summons, the 
          plaintiff was required to return the original summons to the 
          court clerk.  In discussing the benefits of the clerk instead 
          keeping the original summons and the plaintiff only serving a 
          copy, this Committee's analysis of AB 496 stated:

               Currently, a party fills in a blank summons which the clerk 
               "issues" by signing and stamping it, and returning it to 
               the party.  The server is supposed to return the original 
               summons to the court.  (Code of Civil Proc. section 
               583.210.)  Lost summons create inefficiency and obstacles 
               in the functioning of the court because the clerk does not 
               have a copy of the summons (e.g., clerks must reject 
               requests for entry of default because a summons was not 
               returned).  In family law there is already a rule of court 
               that requires the clerk to keep the original summons in the 
               court file, and it is reportedly working well.  This bill 
               would enact a similar provision for all other civil cases.  
               Therefore, this provision of the bill appears to be 
               warranted.

          Accordingly, the proposed additional reference to that 
          requirement will ensure that the change enacted by AB 496 
          applies to objections to the probate of a will.  Additionally, 
          under this bill, any future changes made to increase the 
          efficiency or processes surrounding the issuance of summonses in 
          the CCP will automatically be incorporated into a challenge to 
          the probate of a will.  

           Application to Revocation of Probate Proceedings  :  The proposed 
          change also clarifies the process for the issuance of summons in 
          revocation of probate proceedings.  That clarification occurs 
          because Section 8271 of the Probate Code requires summonses for 
          those proceedings to be "issued and served . . . as in the case 
          of a contest of the will."  (Emphasis added.)

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   









                                                                  SB 491
                                                                  Page  4

           Support  

          None on file

           Opposition 

           None on file


           Analysis Prepared by :  Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334