BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 506
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   July 13, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   SB 506 (Simitian) - As Amended:  June 21, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                             Banking and 
          Finance      Vote:                            9-0
                       Revenue and Taxation                   9-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY 

          This bill provides that, if the state issues a registered 
          warrant to pay principal or interest on a state bond that is 
          held in book entry form by a securities settlement system, the 
          bond's beneficial owner shall be deemed to be the taxpayer who 
          is permitted under existing law to submit a check for taxes owed 
          that the state cannot cash until the registered warrant is 
          payable.  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Bars the state from cashing the beneficial owner's check until 
            the registered warrant is payable.   

          2)Bars any beneficial owner who submits such a check from 
            receiving interest accruing on the registered warrant after 
            the date of the check's submission.

          3)Defines a "state bond" as any general obligation bond or 
            revenue anticipation note issued by the state.  

          4)Authorizes the State Controller to promulgate implementing 
            regulations.


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Costs to the State Controller to administer the provisions of 
          the bill are minor and absorbable.

           COMMENTS  









                                                                  SB 506
                                                                  Page  2

          1)  Purpose  .  According to the author, existing law is defective 
            because it does not recognize the way bonds are issued today.  
            When the law was enacted, California issued physical bonds to 
            investors.  The state now distributes bonds through financial 
            institutions that hold bonds on the investor's behalf, 
            creating uncertainty over who is the bondholder.  As a result, 
            any tax benefits from state issued warrants would accrue to 
            the financial institution holding the debt rather than the 
            actual investor.  SB 506 clarifies that registered warrants 
            can be offset against the taxes of investors, rather than 
            financial intermediaries.  The author argues that SB 506 would 
            pave the way for additional investment in California debt if 
            California ever has to issue RWs again.

           2)Background  .  Warrants are the government equivalent of checks, 
            and are issued by the Controller to pay for the state's 
            obligations.  A registered warrant is a promise to pay, with 
            interest, issued by the State when there is not enough cash to 
            meet the State's payment obligations.  Registered warrants 
            bear interest and are redeemable by the State Treasury when 
            there is sufficient money.  They are legal investments for all 
            trust funds, insurance funds, saving and loan funds and funds 
            of all counties, municipal corporations, districts, public 
            corporations, political subdivisions and state agencies.    
                
            3)When did the State Controller last issue registered warrants?   
            On June 24, 2009, the State Controller announced plans to 
            issue registered warrants in an effort to manage the state's 
            cash crisis.  To ensure the General Fund's ability to make 
            priority status payments, the State Controller's Office began 
            issuing registered warrants (also known as IOUs) on July 2, 
            2009, for all General Fund payments without priority status 
            under the Constitution, federal law or court order.  These 
            warrants earned interest at a rate of 3.75% as determined by 
            the State Pooled Money Investment Board. 

          4)  Relevant legislation  .  

             a)   AB 1044 (Butler), pending in Senate Appropriations, 
               requires the Board of Equalization to accept registered 
               warrants from a taxpayer with any tax, surcharge or fee 
               obligation.  

             b)   SB 11 (Anderson), held on this committee's 2011 Suspense 
               File, would prohibit a state entity from assessing a fine, 








                                                                  SB 506
                                                                  Page  3

               interest or penalty on a debt owed to the state by the 
               payee of a registered warrant for a debt imposed between 
               January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 and would change the 
               due date of a state debt to 30 days after the payable date 
               of the registered warrant. 

             c)   SB 120 (Anderson), pending in this committee, would 
               require a state agency to accept a RW, or other similar 
               evidence of indebtedness issued by the state controller, 
               for payment of any state obligation.  

           5)Previous legislation  

             a)   AB 1506 (Anderson), 2010, required a state agency to 
               accept from a person or entity a registered warrant for the 
               payment of any obligations owed by that payee to the state 
               agency. This measure was vetoed. 



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081