BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 508 (Wolk)
Hearing Date: 04/11/2011 Amended: As Introduced
Consultant: Mark McKenzie Policy Vote: G&F 6-2
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 508 would require any bill introduced on or
after January 1, 2012 that would authorize a new corporate or
income tax credit to include the following:
Specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax credit
is designed to achieve.
Detailed performance indicators to allow for measuring
achievement of stated goals.
Annual data collection requirements to enable a determination
of whether the credit is meeting, exceeding, or failing to
meet the stated goals.
A seven-year sunset of the credit provisions.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund
Future tax credit limitations Unknown, potentially
significant increase in General
tax revenues to the extent that the bill
limits
the duration of future tax expenditures
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS:
Existing state and federal laws provide various tax credits and
other tax benefits designed to provide relief for taxpayers who
incur certain expenses, such as those related to child adoption,
or to influence behavior, including business practices and
decisions by providing benefits such as research credits or
economic development area hiring credits. These benefits
generally are designed to provide incentives for taxpayers to
perform various actions or activities that they may not
otherwise undertake. Although the Department of Finance
annually reports to the Legislature on tax expenditures
exceeding $5 million annually, the data that is reported in
insufficient to measure whether the incentive of a tax credit is
successful in achieving a desired purpose or objective. The
most recent report indicates that state tax expenditures
resulted in foregone revenues of $47 billion in 2010-11. Staff
notes that tax credits may generally be enacted by a majority
vote of the Legislature, but repealing or applying a sunset to
an existing credit requires a 2/3 vote of the Legislature
SB 508 (Wolk)
Page 3
because doing so would result in an increase in tax revenues
(Section 3 of Article XIIA of the California Constitution).
SB 508 applies to tax expenditures enacted on or after January
1, 2012 by applying specified requirements to any new personal
income tax or corporate tax credits, including a mandatory
seven-year sunset. Staff notes that this Legislature cannot
affirmatively bind future ones under County of Los Angeles v.
State of California (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 568, 573. SB 508
would therefore only apply contingently to future measures. To
the extent a future Legislature honors the provisions of this
bill, however,
there could be unknown and potentially significant revenue gains
by limiting the duration of future tax expenditures.
The Franchise Tax Board estimates that bill does not have an
impact on revenue or the department because any impact would be
related to future legislation.
Staff notes that this bill is nearly identical to SB 1272
(Wolk), which was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger last year.
The veto message stated the following:
I am returning Senate Bill 1272 without my signature.
While the sponsors seem intent on eliminating measures that
will generate jobs and stimulate the economy, the average
California taxpayer would probably be better served if the
Legislature were willing to automatically sunset every new
spending entitlement, program expansion and business
mandate after 7 years.