BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 547|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 547
          Author:   Steinberg (D)
          Amended:  5/4/11
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  7-3, 4/27/11
          AYES:  Lowenthal, Alquist, Hancock, Liu, Price, Simitian, 
            Vargas
          NOES:  Runner, Blakeslee, Huff
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-2, 5/26/11
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Pavley, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Runner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Emmerson


           SUBJECT  :    Academic Performance Index

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill (1) reduces the proportion of the 
          Academic Performance Index (API) value that relies on the 
          results of the California Standards Tests and the 
          California High School Exit Exam, (2)   requires the State 
          Board of Education, in consultation with the Superintendent 
          of Public Instruction (SPI) and the advisory committee, to 
          incorporate into the API a measure or measures of the 
          degree to which pupils graduate from high school with the 
          skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in college and 
          career by January 1, 2014, and (3) expands the information 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 547
                                                                Page 
          2

          to be reported and improvements to be demonstrated by 
          school districts to include preparedness of its pupils for 
          success in postsecondary education and career, as measured 
          by the API.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes the Public School 
          Performance Accountability Program under which the 
          Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI), with approval 
          of the State Board of Education (SBE), is required to 
          develop an API to measure the performance of schools.  The 
          API was proposed as a means of combining multiple 
          indicators of school performance into one easy-to-compare 
          index.  The API is required to consist of a variety of 
          indicators including, but not limited to, the results of 
          the achievement test, attendance rates for pupils in 
          elementary schools, middle schools, and secondary schools, 
          and the graduation rates for pupils in secondary schools. 

          Existing law also requires that the results of the 
          California Standards Tests and the California High School 
          Exit Exam constitute at least 60 percent of the API. 

          Existing law also requires the SPI to establish a broadly 
          representative committee (the Public School Accountability 
          Advisory Committee) to advise the SPI and the SBE on the 
          creation of the Academic Performance Index (API). SBX5 1 
          (Steinberg), Chapter 2, Statutes of 2010, Fifth 
          Extraordinary Session, in addition required the SPI and 
          SBE, in consultation with the advisory committee to 
          recommend to the Legislature and Governor by January 1, 
          2011, methods and approaches for incorporating into the 
          calculation of the API:

          1.An increased emphasis on math and science.

          2.Measures of the degree to which pupils graduate from high 
            school with the skills and knowledge necessary to attain 
            entry-level employment in business or industry.

          3.Measures of the degree to which pupils graduate from high 
            school with the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed 
            in postsecondary education.

          This bill: 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 547
                                                                Page 
          3


          1. Expands the current requirements that schools must meet 
             under the API to include the demonstration of comparable 
             improvement in preparedness of its pupils for success in 
             postsecondary education and career as measured by the 
             API for all numerically significant subgroups at the 
             school.

          2. Expands the indicators to be reported by schools to the 
             department for purposes of the API to include 
             postsecondary education and career preparedness of 
             pupils in secondary schools.

          3. Changes the proportion of the API value that relies on 
             the results of the California Standards Tests and the 
             California High School Exit Exam. Specifically it:

             A.    Reduces the proportion from at least 60 percent to 
                a minimum of 40 percent for schools serving students 
                in grades K-8.
              
             B.    Establishes a maximum proportion of 40% for 
                schools serving students in grades 9-12.

          4. Requires that the SBE, in consultation with the SPI and 
             the Public School Advisory Accountability Committee, by 
             January 1, 2014, incorporate into the API a measure or 
             measures of the degree to which pupils graduate from 
             high school with the skills and knowledge necessary to 
             succeed in college and career.

          5. Requires that measures considered for incorporation in 
             the API be valid, reliable, and stable, and include, but 
             not be limited to:

             A.    Rates of completion of a course of study at an 
                achievement level that fulfills California's 
                four-year public postsecondary institution's 
                requirements and pre-requisites for admission. 

             B.    Rates of administration of college preparedness 
                assessments and rates at which assessed students 
                demonstrate they do not need remedial coursework.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 547
                                                                Page 
          4

             C.    Rates of enrollment and satisfactory performance 
                in Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, 
                or concurrent enrollment programs.

             D.    Pupil GPAs in the first year of full-time 
                postsecondary enrollment.

             E.    Rates of enrollment in a community college 
                transfer curriculum.

             F.    Rates of enrollment in a community college course 
                of technical study leading to a professional 
                certificate.

             G.    Rates of satisfactory completion of career 
                pathways or series of courses that meet career 
                technical content standards adopted by the SBE.

             H.    Rates at which students earn certificates, 
                licenses, or the equivalent in designated occupations 
                for which they are issued while in high school.

             I.    Performance of students on valid and reliable 
                assessments including portfolio assessments designed 
                to assess skills and knowledge acquired to be 
                successful in a specified occupation or in the 
                general workforce.

             J.    Rates of employment of graduates in occupations 
                with a career ladder, as defined.

             K.    Rates of employment of graduates in an 
                apprenticeship program leading to full-time 
                employment.

             L.    Earnings of graduates.

             M.    Rates at which graduates secure employment that 
                offers paid sick leave, vacation and employer 
                provided health benefits.

             N.    Other measures such as enlistment in the Armed 
                Forces, California Conservation Corps or other 
                volunteer service organizations. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 547
                                                                Page 
          5


          6. Requires the SBE to devise methods to significantly 
             reward schools and districts that can demonstrate pupil 
             subgroups are proportionately represented among students 
             prepared and eligible to attend four-year colleges and 
             universities.

          7. Requires the SBE to consider the appropriateness of 
             including in the API or other aspects of the state's 
             accountability system, a measure or measures of pupil 
             satisfaction with and engagement in their secondary 
             school education including, but not limited to 
             attendance rates and surveys of pupil, staff and parent 
             attitudes, as specified.

          8. Requires that any changes allow for disaggregation of 
             component parts of the API so that measures and their 
             relative weight are distinguishable to parents, the 
             public, and policymakers.

          9. Requires that the SBE not be limited in its redesign of 
             the API by the scope of the California Longitudinal 
             Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) or other 
             relevant data systems. 

          10.Requires the SPI and the SBE to consult with the 
             University of California, California Community Colleges, 
             California Community Colleges, and the Employment 
             Development Department, and to report to the Governor 
             and Legislature additional data items and connections 
             between data systems that are necessary to optimize the 
             state's capacity, and to better enable the ability to 
             evaluate the effectiveness of pupil preparedness for 
             college and career and pupil's engagement in school by 
             Mach 15, 2012.

          11.Makes various related findings and declarations. 

           Comments
           
           Status of Current Efforts  .  According to the Senate 
          Education Committee, SBX5 1 (Steinberg) required the SPI, 
          SBE, and the Public School Accountability Act (PSAA) 
          Advisory Committee to make recommendations for 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 547
                                                                Page 
          6

          incorporating measures of college and career preparedness 
          into the API by January 2011.  Staff was unable to obtain 
          any official communication from the CDE summarizing the 
          review and recommendations by the PSAA Advisory Committee 
          on this topic. However, in a program update on 
          Accountability presented by the CDE in September 2010, 
          presentation documents note that the PSAA Advisory 
          Committee recommended that the current API be maintained, 
          that there be stakeholder review of measures, and noted a 
          need for additional resources. Clarification of these 
          general findings by the CDE would be helpful in assessing 
          whether/what additional statutory action is necessary in 
          order to develop and incorporate college and career 
          preparedness measures into the API. 

           Mandate  .  Legislative Counsel has noted that, to the extent 
          school districts would be required to formulate and report 
          additional data for purposes of inclusion in the API this 
          bill may create potentially reimbursable state-mandated 
          costs.  Although the actual costs are unknown and would 
          depend upon the metrics developed, a Senate Appropriations 
          Committee analysis of a similar bill, AB 400 (Nunez), 
          2007-2008 Session, noted that, to the extent that local 
          education agencies did not already collect this data, that 
          bill created significant costs, unknown but potentially in 
          the millions, for districts to compile this information and 
          report it to the CDE.  AB 400 was ultimately vetoed by the 
          Governor. 

           Similar Legislation
           
          AB 224 (Bonilla), 2011-2012 Session, requires the SPI, in 
          consultation with the SBE, to incorporate additional 
          measures of performance in the areas of college 
          preparedness and workforce preparation into the API using 
          the best available data and commencing in fiscal year 
          2012-13.  (On Assembly Appropriations Committee Suspense 
          File)

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  Yes

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 547
                                                                Page 
          7

           Major Provisions             2011-12             2012-13         
              2013-14            Fund

           API redesign                                            
          $150                  $150           General

          New API factors            Potentially substantial costs; 
          new                  General
                                                 mandates likely  

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/27/11)

          America's Edge
          Association of Independent California Colleges and 
          Universities
          California Business Educators Association
          California Manufacturing and Technology Association
          Children Now
          Genentech
          Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
          Los Angeles Unified School District
          Metropolitan Education District
          North State Building Industry Association
          State Building and Construction Trades of California
          University of California


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office, 
          the API has performed an important function, but has been 
          limited by its sole reliance on standardized test scores as 
          indicators of school performance and has encouraged 
          schools/districts to focus on test scores and deemphasize 
          other important aspects of education.  Although dropout and 
          graduation rates are statutorily required to be 
          incorporated into the API, that has not yet occurred.  The 
          author contends that it is time to reduce the proportion of 
          the API which may rely on test scores and require revision 
          of the API to include measures of student preparedness for 
          college and career.


          CPM:cm  5/27/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 547
                                                                Page 
          8


                                ****  END  ****











































                                                           CONTINUED