BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 592
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 26, 2012

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
                                  Mike Feuer, Chair
                     SB 592 (Harman) - As Amended:  May 15, 2012

                              As Proposed to Be Amended

           SENATE VOTE  :   38-0
           
          SUBJECT  :   DAIRY CATTLE SUPPLY LIENS

           KEY ISSUE  :  SHOULD CALIFORNIA'S DAIRY CATTLE SUPPLY LIEN LAW BE 
          UPDATED AND MODERNIZED TO PROVIDE CLEARER DIRECTION TO 
          CREDITORS, DAIRY FARMERS, AND THE COURTS IN A MANNER THAT 
          PROMOTES CONSISTENCY WITH THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE (UCC)?

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.

                                      SYNOPSIS
          
          Existing law currently provides a right for animal feed 
          providers to dairy animals to obtain a lien upon the proceeds of 
          a dairy's milk payments.  This statute, known as the dairy 
          supply lien law, has not been significantly updated or revised 
          since it was first enacted in 1987.  According to the author, 
          the current statute contains a number of ambiguities and 
          limitations that have left creditors, dairy persons, courts, and 
          bankruptcy trustees without clear direction with respect to the 
          foreclosure and lien process when the borrowing dairy person 
          becomes distressed.  This non-controversial bill is sponsored by 
          the California Grain and Feed Association (CGFA) but represents 
          the collaborative efforts of a working group of dairymen, feed 
          and grain producers, bankers, and other stakeholders to revise 
          and update the state's dairy supply lien law.  Among other 
          things, this bill seeks to: (1) expand provision of the written 
          notice of the claim of lien; (2) clarify the priority of 
          conflicting security interests and agricultural liens, 
          consistent with the UCC; and (3) clarify claim enforcement 
          options available to creditors following default of payment.  As 
          proposed to be amended, this bill has no known opposition.

           SUMMARY  :  Revises the dairy cattle supply lien law to provide 
          creditors of dairies clearer direction on obtaining a lien upon 
          the proceeds of the dairy's milk products.  Specifically,  this 








                                                                 SB 592
                                                                  Page  2

          bill  , among other things:    

          1)Authorizes the dairy cattle supply lien to attach to milk 
            proceeds when the feed or materials provided by the lien 
            claimant aided the raising or maintenance of the dairy cattle 
            or any offspring therefrom.

          2)Provides that the amount of charges secured by the lien cannot 
            exceed an amount equal to the reasonable or agreed charges for 
            feed or material provided within a 60-day period, rather than 
            the current 45-day period, and that only one dairy supply lien 
            per dairy producer is available per affiliated business 
            supplier. 

          3)Requires the lien claimant to provide written notice of the 
            claim to the lien debtor, secured parties or lienholders, and 
            other persons, as specified, within 10 days of filing the 
            claim with the Secretary of State.

          4)Requires the lien claimant, within 20 days after receiving a 
            demand from a lien debtor, to send the lien debtor a 
            termination statement if the lien has been terminated, as 
            specified.

          5)Provides that the priority of conflicting security interests, 
            agricultural liens, and the dairy supply lien established by 
            this act shall be governed by existing law pursuant to Section 
            9322 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as specified.

          6)Authorizes a lien claimant, after payment default by the lien 
            debtor, to foreclose on a dairy supply lien in any of the 
            following ways:

             a)   Foreclose in an action to recover charges for feed or 
               materials delivered.

             b)   Notify any person obligated under the lien to make 
               payment to the lien claimant, except that such demand for 
               payment may not be made until 15 calendar days after the 
               date of the notice and concurrent notice must be provided 
               to the lien debtor, secured creditors, and others, as 
               specified.

             c)   Enforce the obligations of any person subject to the 
               dairy supply lien, and exercise the rights of the lien 








                                                                  SB 592
                                                                  Page  3

               debtor with respect to the proceeds or any property that 
               secures the right to proceeds subject to the lien.

          7)Clarifies that nothing in this act prohibits a lien claimant 
            from seeking provisional remedies pursuant to Title 6.5 of 
            Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, such as the right to 
            attach order and a writ of attachment, or a temporary 
            protective order.

          8)Allows a dairy obligated under a dairy supply lien, when 
            presented with a demand notice to make payment from a feed 
            creditor, to honor a prior assignment of milk proceeds without 
            liability for failure to comply with such notice.

          9)Allows a lien debtor to secure a release of a lien by paying 
            the amount secured by the lien, or depositing with the 
            Secretary of State a surety bond, as specified, for the 
            purpose of guaranteeing payment of the full amount secured by 
            the lien within 35 days after entry of final judgment.

          10)Clarifies that these provisions shall apply only 
            prospectively to all contracts entered into after January 1, 
            2013.

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Authorizes a person who provides feed or materials to aid the 
            raising or maintaining of dairy cattle to place a lien upon 
            the proceeds of the milk or milk products produced from the 
            dairy cattle for the reasonable or agreed charges for the feed 
            or materials provided and for the costs of enforcing the lien. 
             (Food & Agricultural Code Section 57402.  All further 
            references are to this code unless otherwise stated.)

          2)Limits the amount of charges secured by the lien to an amount 
            less than or equal to the reasonable or agreed charges for 
            feed or material provided within a 45-day period, and only two 
            providers of feed or materials can have an enforceable lien at 
            any time, with lien priority in accordance with the time the 
            notice of claim of lien is filed.  (Section 57402.)

          3)Requires a lien claimant to provide written notice at least 30 
            days prior to enforcing a lien claim to secured creditors who 
            have a perfected security interest in dairy cattle, milk, milk 
            products, or the proceeds thereof as of the date the notice of 








                                                                  SB 592
                                                                  Page  4

            claim of lien is filed with the Secretary of State.  (Section 
            57412.)

          4)Requires the lien claimant, in order to perfect the lien, to 
            file a notice of claim of lien with the Secretary of State 
            that, among other things, must provide the name and address of 
            the lien debtor and be signed by the lien claimant or another 
            authorized person, and also requires the lien claimant to 
            provide written notice of the claim to the lien debtor within 
            10 days of the date of filing the notice of lien.  (Section 
            57405.)

          5)Provides that the dairy cattle supply lien shall have priority 
            in accordance with the time the notice of claim of lien is 
            filed and the same priority as a security interest perfected 
            by the filing of a financing statement as of the date the 
            notice was filed.  (Section 57406.)

          6)Allows a lien claimant to foreclose on a dairy cattle supply 
            lien only through an action to recover the reasonable or 
            agreed charges for feed and materials delivered.  (Section 
            57413.)

           COMMENTS  :  Existing law currently provides a right for animal 
          feed providers to dairy animals to obtain a lien upon the 
          proceeds of milk payments.  This statute, known as the dairy 
          supply lien law, has not been significantly updated or revised 
          since it was first enacted in 1987, despite what the author 
          views as inherent ambiguities and deficiencies as evidenced by 
          recent litigation to enforce such liens.  According to the 
          author:

             The California dairy industry has lost $2 billion in 
             equity since the collapse of the market in the fall of 
             2008.  Many feed suppliers maintained service to dairies 
             for as long as viable but also had significant capital 
             losses during this time.  As some dairies became 
             "distressed assets" or even filed for bankruptcies, this 
             little known dairy lien law started to be recognized - 
             with various applications.  CGFA undertook a significant 
             process of analyzing and reviewing the law, deficiencies, 
             as well as industry business practices to better 
             understand what went wrong and what could be adjusted.  
             This bill seeks to update the dairy lien law and remove 
             limitations and ambiguities that have left creditors, 








                                                                  SB 592
                                                                  Page  5

             dairy persons, judges and bankruptcy trustees without 
             clear direction. This measure attempts to more closely 
             mirror the Commercial Code where appropriate and provide a 
             method to perfect the lien upon default consistent with 
             that Code. 
           
          Expansion of lien authority to include feed or materials used to 
          raise offspring of dairy cattle  .  Existing law establishes that 
          any person who provides feed or materials to aid the raising or 
          maintaining of dairy cattle has a lien upon the proceeds of the 
          milk or milk products produced from the dairy cattle.  (Section 
          57402.)  This bill would expand that provision by allowing the 
          lien to attach to the milk proceeds when the feed or materials 
          provided by the lien claimant aided the raising of the dairy 
          cattle or offspring therefrom (emphasis added).  This modest 
          change simply makes the lien on milk proceeds available to the 
          feed provider whether the feed was consumed by the dairy cow or 
          by its offspring-in either case the feed was provided, consumed, 
          and should be ultimately paid for by the dairy person.

           As proposed to be amended, this bill expands provision of the 
          written notice of the claim of lien to those who may have a 
          security interest in the dairy proceeds.   The author has 
          proposed to amend the bill to require the lien claimant to 
          provide written notice of the claim of lien to not only the lien 
          debtor, but other lienholders or parties who may have a security 
          interest in the milk proceeds, as specified.  According to the 
          author and sponsor, this amendment requires notice to the same 
          parties that are entitled to notice of a strict foreclosure 
          under Section 9621 of the Uniform Commercial Code.  As a result, 
          the bill now requires all senior and secured lien holders to 
          receive notice of the dairy supply lien, and serves to put dairy 
          operators on notice of their liability in the event they fail to 
          satisfy amounts owed to the animal feed supplier.  Written 
          notice to the dairy operator that they are subject to the dairy 
          supply lien presumably will alert them to the statutory changes 
          proposed by this bill and help them consider their debts 
          accordingly.  

          As proposed to be amended, this bill clarifies that the priority 
          of conflicting security interests and agricultural liens shall 
          be consistent with the UCC.   With respect to lien priority, 
          existing law provides only that the dairy cattle supply lien 
          "shall have the same priority as a security interest perfected 
          by the filing of a financing statement as of the date the notice 








                                                                  SB 592
                                                                  Page  6

          of claim of lien was filed."  (Section 57406.)  Supporters 
          contend that this rule is not sufficient to clearly resolve 
          situations where there are valid conflicting security interests 
          and other liens.  Therefore, the author proposes to amend the 
          bill to clarify that the priority of the dairy cattle supply 
          lien with respect to conflicting security interests and other 
          agricultural liens shall be governed by the priority provisions 
          of Section 9322 of the Uniform Commercial Code-a familiar set of 
          rules already used in a variety of contexts to determine lien 
          priority for secured transactions.  Generally speaking, Section 
          9322 provides that conflicting perfected security interests and 
          agricultural liens rank according to priority in time of filing 
          or perfection.  According to the author, most conflicts are 
          likely to be resolved with the same result, but incorporation of 
          the UCC rules by reference will also result in less ambiguity in 
          close cases.
           
          As proposed to be amended, this bill expands claim enforcement 
          options available to creditors following payment default by 
          dairy companies.   According to the author and sponsor, an 
          increasing number of dairy farms are being foreclosed upon 
          because of the recent economic downturn, but feed providers who 
          file lien claims are finding it difficult to recover monies 
          awarded through an enforcement proceeding because they do not 
          have a right to attach the milk proceeds.  Furthermore, they 
          report that courts are unsure how to enforce these liens during 
          bankruptcy proceedings under the relatively sparse provisions of 
          the current dairy lien law.

          Existing law allows a lien claimant to bring an action in court 
          to recover the reasonable or agreed charges for feed or 
          materials delivered.  As proposed to be amended, this bill would 
          also authorize certain non-judicial foreclosure procedures that 
          largely mirror provisions from the UCC (Commercial Code Section 
          9670).  Specifically, the bill would authorize the lien 
          claimant, after payment default by the lien debtor, to foreclose 
          on a dairy supply lien by (a) notifying any person obligated 
          under the lien to make payment to the lien claimant, except that 
          such demand for payment may not be made until 15 calendar days 
          after the date of the notice; or (b) enforcing the obligations 
          of any person subject to the dairy supply lien, and exercising 
          the rights of the lien debtor with respect to the proceeds or 
          any property that secures the right to proceeds subject to the 
          lien.  The guaranteed 15-day period between the notice and the 
          date that payment may be demanded differs from Section 9670 of 








                                                                  SB 592
                                                                  Page  7

          the UCC to the benefit of providing more time to the debtor 
          dairy.  As proposed to be amended, the bill also requires the 
          lien claimant to provide concurrent notice of lien enforcement 
          efforts to secured creditors and other parties, and, after 
          receiving any proceeds, to provide an accounting and pay any 
          surplus to the lien debtor.
           
          Existing law provides a right of attachment under Title 6.5 of 
          Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which authorizes the 
          creditor to attach property, farm products, and accounts 
          receivables, as specified, unless otherwise exempt.  As proposed 
          to be amended, the bill clarifies that nothing in the dairy lien 
          law shall prohibit the lien claimant from exercising this 
          existing authority under Title 6.5 to seek from the court other 
          provisional remedies, such as a writ of attachment or a 
          temporary protective order.

           Author's proposed amendment clarifying liability of milk 
          handlers.   Creameries perform an important function in the 
          supply chain from the dairy to the supermarket shelf.  Typically 
          referred to as "handlers" in the Food and Agriculture Code, 
          these business persons essentially receive unprocessed milk in 
          bulk form from dairy producers for the purpose of manufacture, 
          processing, and/or sale.  Handlers are among those who could be 
          served with a notice to pay pursuant to lien enforcement 
          proceedings under this bill.  According to the author, some milk 
          producers and handlers engage in the practice of assigning their 
          milk proceeds to lenders, who then may take the amount owed to 
          them and pay any remaining balance into the borrower's account.  
          The author proposes to amend the bill to provide a safe harbor 
          from liability for handlers that will allow them to honor a 
          prior assignment of milk proceeds when presented with a notice 
          demanding payment from a feed provider seeking to enforce a 
          dairy supply lien.

           Author's proposed amendment to eliminate cash guarantees 
          deposited with the Secretary of State.   As currently in print, 
          the bill authorizes a lien debtor to secure the release of the 
          diary supply lien by depositing an adequate cash sum with the 
          Secretary of State for the purpose of guaranteeing full payment 
          of the amount secured by the lien.  According to the author, 
          however, the Secretary of State has notified the author that it 
          no longer accepts cash sums, making this provision problematic.  
          The author proposes to amend the bill to eliminate this 
          provision regarding cash deposits.  In any case, the bill still 








                                                                  SB 592
                                                                  Page  8

          allows a lien debtor the option of depositing a surety bond with 
          the Secretary of State in the appropriate amount in order to 
          secure release of the lien.

           Author's proposed amendment requiring prospective application  .  
          As proposed to be amended, the bill clarifies that these 
          provisions shall apply to all contracts entered into on or after 
          January 1, 2013, so as not to potentially impair existing 
          contracts.  This would allow dairies to know precisely what lien 
          remedies are available to its suppliers when it enters into a 
          contract to purchase feed on credit after the date this bill 
          would become operative if signed into law.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          California Grain and Feed Association (sponsor)
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Anthony Lew / JUD. / (916) 319-2334