BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                 SB 612
                                                                 Page  1


         SENATE THIRD READING
         SB 612 (Steinberg)
         As Amended  August 26, 2011
         Majority vote 

          SENATE VOTE  :27-10  
          
          HIGHER EDUCATION    5-2         EDUCATION           7-2          
          
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |Ayes:|Block, Fong, Galgiani,    |Ayes:|Brownley, Ammiano,        |
         |     |Lara, Portantino          |     |Buchanan, Butler, Carter, |
         |     |                          |     |Eng, Williams             |
         |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
         |Nays:|Donnelly, Miller          |Nays:|Norby, Beth Gaines        |
         |     |                          |     |                          |
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                         
          
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |     |                          |
         |     |Bradford, Charles         |     |                          |
         |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |     |                          |
         |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |     |                          |
         |     |Mitchell, Solorio         |     |                          |
         |     |                          |     |                          |
         |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
         |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |     |                          |
         |     |Nielsen, Norby, Wagner    |     |                          |
         |     |                          |     |                          |
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          SUMMARY  :   Extends the sunset date of the California Subject Matter 
         Projects (CSMPs) until January 1, 2018, and makes the following 
         changes: 

         1)Requires the CSMPs to provide teachers with instructional 
           strategies for delivering career-oriented, integrated academic 
           technical content in a manner that is linked to high priority 
           industry sectors identified in the state career technical 
           education (CTE) model curriculum standards. 

         2)Authorizes the establishment of a physical education/health, 
           arts, and world language CSMP.  

         3)Requires the CSMPs, in partnership with the University of 







                                                                 SB 612
                                                                 Page  2


           California (UC) Curriculum Integration Institute or other 
           appropriate entities, to provide teachers with support in the 
           implementation of career-oriented, integrated academic and 
           technical courses that meet course requirements for admission to 
           the UC and the California State University (CSU), and align with 
           high priority industry sections, as specified.  

         4)Requires the CSMP Concurrence Committee, beginning on January 1, 
           2016, and every three years thereafter, to provide a report on 
           the subject matter projects to the governor and the appropriate 
           policy committees of the Legislature.  Further requires the 
           report to include information on CTE professional development 
           provided to teachers, as specified.  

         5)Changes the makeup of the Concurrence Committee to include one 
           representative selected by the Superintendent of Public 
           Instruction (SPI).  This does not change the overall number of 
           the Concurrence Committee; instead, the State Board of Education 
           (SBE) will now select only one representative instead of two.  

         6)Adds one representative from an industry sector to each CSMP 
           advisory board and reduces the number of individuals who serve on 
           each CSMP advisory committee from 15 to 10, as specified. 

         7)Adds schools with a dropout rate that exceeds the statewide 
           average as one of the criteria each project advisory board 
           utilizes to recommend project funding.  

         8)Requires each project board, for purposes of recommending funding 
           that serves middle/high school teachers, to give special 
           consideration to sites that utilize or are preparing to utilize 
           instructional strategies to deliver career-oriented, integrated 
           academic and technical content.  

         9)Updates CSMP statute to account for the state's adoption of the 
           Common Core Standards in English language arts and mathematics.  

         10)Provides that these provisions become operative only if funding 
           is provided in the annual Budget Act or if federal funds are made 
           available and appropriated, or both, for the purposes of this 
           bill.

          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, 
         annual GF costs between $1.2 and $1.8 million to UC to integrate 
         career-oriented, academic technical content in all nine CSMPs.  







                                                                 SB 612
                                                                 Page  3


         These costs are associated with developing content for each project 
         and providing stipends to educators to attend training in this 
         area.  This bill specifies these provisions are not operative 
         unless an appropriation is provided for this purpose.

          COMMENTS  :   Established in 1988, CSMP is a statewide network of 
         subject-specific professional development programs for teachers, 
         administered by the UC Office of the President, bringing together 
         K-12, college, and university faculty in a variety of institutes 
         and yearlong programs.  CSMP participants engage in study and 
         practice of the disciplines and explore effective approaches to 
         teaching, all within a climate that supports reflection and 
         critique.  Each year the CSMP serves between 25,000-30,000 teachers 
         with an average of nearly 40 hours of training in a given subject 
         area.  According to a 2005 evaluation of the CSMP conducted by SRI 
         International, teachers reported that the CSMP influenced their 
         instruction more than other professional development and 
         contributed to improvements in student learning.  

         With the adoption of K-12 academic content standards in the late 
         1990s, the state narrowed the focus of the CSMP to the core content 
         areas of English language arts, mathematics, science, and 
         history-social science, and subject matter projects in arts, 
         foreign language, and physical education-health were deleted from 
         statute.  AB 1734 (Mazzoni) Chapter 333, Statutes of 1998, 
         authorized the six projects currently specified in statute and 
         authorized UC to establish additional subject matter projects but 
         prohibited such projects from receiving funding in the annual 
         Budget Act.  SB 611 (Ducheny) Chapter 857, Statutes of 2003, 
         expressed legislative intent that maintenance-level funding be 
         provided for projects in academic fields seeking standards approval 
         from the SBE.  Accordingly, the UC has continued to operate subject 
         matter projects in the arts, foreign language, and physical 
         education/health, for which the SBE has adopted K-12 academic 
         standards.  According to UC, it currently supports the three 
         projects with the CSMP maintenance-level funding and will not seek 
         additional state funding for the projects; however, the author 
         notes that establishing these projects in statute could make it 
         easier for UC to successfully compete for foundation funding to 
         provide additional support for the projects.

          
         Analysis Prepared by  :    Sandra Fried / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960 
                                                           FN: 0002222








                                                                 SB 612
                                                                 Page  4