BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE BILL NO: SB 616
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN AUTHOR: Desaulnier
VERSION: 1/4/12
Analysis by: Mark Stivers FISCAL: no
Hearing date: January 10, 2012
SUBJECT:
Common interest development board meetings
DESCRIPTION:
This bill clarifies that the written consent of all members of a
common interest development board is only required for the board
to take actions in an electronic emergency meeting, not to hold
an emergency meeting generally.
ANALYSIS:
A common interest development (CID) is a form of real estate in
which each homeowner has an exclusive interest in a unit or lot
and a shared or undivided interest in common area property.
Condominiums, planned unit developments, stock cooperatives,
community apartments, and many resident-owned mobilehome parks
all fall under the CID umbrella. A homeowner association board
elected by the members governs each CID.
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act establishes
the legal framework and statutory rules that CIDs must follow.
SB 563 (Transportation and Housing Committee), Chapter 257,
Statutes of 2011, amended the open meeting portion of the act to
prohibit generally CID boards from taking action on items of
business outside of an open meeting but specifically allowed a
CID board to conduct an electronic (e.g., e-mail) meeting in an
emergency situation if all the members of the board consent in
writing to actions taken in the electronic emergency meeting.
This bill corrects a drafting error and clarifies that the
written consent of all members of a common interest development
board is only required for the board to take actions in an
electronic emergency meeting, not to hold an emergency meeting
generally.
COMMENTS:
SB 616 (DESAULNIER) Page 2
1.Purpose of the bill . Practitioners in the field of CID law
have raised a concern that the language of SB 563 can be
interpreted to require unanimous consent for a CID board to
hold any emergency meeting at all, electronic or otherwise,
which was not the intent of SB 563. This bill corrects that
drafting error.
2.Letter to the journal . Practitioners raised the concern about
the language of SB 563 late last year at a time when it was
too late to amend the bill. While promising to fix the error
as soon as possible, the author submitted a letter to the
Senate Daily Journal stating:
The intent of this provision is solely to clarify that
board members may electronically submit the written
consents required to take an action in an electronic
emergency meeting. The language is not intended to, and
does not, imply that all board members must consent to hold
an emergency meeting, electronically or otherwise.
The author intended the letter to the journal to be a
temporary help until the Legislature could correct the error.
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on
Wednesday, January
4, 2012)
SUPPORT: None received.
OPPOSED: None received.