BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 623
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 16, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 623 (Kehoe) - As Amended: August 7, 2012
Policy Committee: HealthVote:13-6
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires the Office of Statewide Health Planning and
Development (OSHPD) to extend a pilot project training mid-level
medical practitioners to perform aspiration abortions by 15
months until January 1, 2014, in order to allow time to evaluate
and publish results of the pilot.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible state fiscal impact.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. The author indicates this bill is necessary to
allow a pilot project to maintain its momentum, and to allow
study researchers from the University of California time to
achieve publication of their study results in a peer-reviewed
journal. The author indicates study results thus far indicate
midlevel clinicians can be trained to safely provide
first-trimester aspiration abortions.
2)Background . Current law authorizes OSHPD to conduct pilot
projects, which sometimes waive certain scope of practice
laws, in order to study new workforce models or training
methods. OSPHD accepts applications for workforce pilot
projects from project sponsors. Sponsors who apply for a
pilot project must have their own funding; OSHPD does not
provide any funding for pilot projects. OSHPD has one
budgeted position monitoring all open pilot projects.
OSHPD approved Health Workforce Pilot Project # 171 for the
time period March 31, 2007 - March 31, 2008, and has approved
SB 623
Page 2
four extensions since that time. The project is currently
approved through September 30, 2012. It is assessing the
ability of nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and
physician assistance to be trained to offer vacuum aspiration
for abortion and miscarriage management. Vacuum aspiration is
a minor surgical procedure that can be used in early pregnancy
and uses gentle vacuum suction to remove uterine tissue.
3)Opposition. Several groups opposed to abortion oppose this
bill. The California Right to Life Committee, Inc. believes
the extension of this project places women's health and safety
in danger and removes their right of choice to control their
own health care decisions. The Life Priority Network (LPN)
questions whether patient safety can be assured if qualified
physicians are not available. California Catholic Conference,
Inc. (CCC) writes in opposition that this bill is a late
introduction gut-and-amend bill, designed to address the
failure of SB 1338 (Kehoe) earlier this year. (This bill
was heard in this form for the first time on July 3, 2012 in
Assembly Health Committee).
4)Related Legislation. SB 1338 would have allowed a NP, CNM, and
PA who had completed training in the Project to continue to
perform abortions by aspiration technique. SB 1338 failed
passage in the Senate Business, Professions and Economic
Development Committee.
Analysis Prepared by : Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081