BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 644
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  August 31, 2011

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                                Cameron Smyth, Chair
                   SB 644 (Hancock) - As Amended:  August 29, 2011

           SENATE VOTE  :  Vote not relevant
           
          SUBJECT  :  Local finance.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires all certificates of participation executed 
          and delivered by the West Contra Costa Healthcare District 
          (District) between June 8, 2004, and December 31, 2012, to be 
          secured by a statutory lien on all the revenues generated from a 
          parcel tax passed by District voters in 2004.  Specifically, 
           this bill  :

          1)Requires all certificates of participation (COPs) executed and 
            delivered by the West Contra Costa Healthcare District between 
            June 8, 2004, and December 31, 2012, to be secured by a 
            statutory lien on all the revenues generated from a parcel tax 
            passed by District voters 
          in 2004. 

          2)Requires the lien to arise automatically without the need for 
            any action or authorization by the District.

          3)Specifies that the lien shall be valid and binding from the 
            time the COPs are executed and delivered. 

          4)Requires the parcel tax to be immediately subject to this 
            lien.

          5)Requires the lien to immediately attach to the parcel tax 
            revenue and be effective, binding, and enforceable against the 
            District, its successors, purchasers of those revenues, 
            creditors, and all others asserting the rights therein, 
            irrespective of whether those parties have notice 
          of the lien. 

          6)Adds an urgency clause. 

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Defines "bonds" as any bonds, notes, bond anticipation notes, 








                                                                  SB 644
                                                                  Page  2

            commercial paper, or other evidences of indebtedness, or 
            lease, installment purchase, or other agreements, or COPs 
            therein, that are not issued pursuant to statutory authority 
            containing a provision governing the perfection and priority 
            of pledges of collateral unless the provision provides that 
            this chapter shall govern.

          2)Defines "pledge" as, and as used in any pledge document shall 
            be deemed to create, a grant of a lien on and a security 
            interest in and pledge of the collateral referred to in a 
            pledge document.


          3)Requires a pledge of collateral by any public body to secure, 
            directly or indirectly, the payment of the principal or 
            redemption price of, or interest on, any bonds, or any 
            reimbursement or similar agreement with any provider of credit 
            enhancement for bonds, which is issued by or entered into by a 
            public body, to be valid and binding in accordance with the 
            terms of the pledge document from the time the pledge is made 
            for the benefit of pledgees and successors thereto.


          4)Requires the collateral to immediately be subject to the 
            pledge, and the pledges constitute a lien and security 
            interest which shall immediately attach to the collateral and 
            be effective, binding, and enforceable against the pledgor, 
            its successors, purchasers of the collateral, creditors, and 
            all others asserting the rights therein, to the extent set 
            forth, and in accordance with, the pledge document 
            irrespective of whether those parties have notice of the 
            pledge and without the need for any physical delivery, 
            recordation, filing, or further act.


           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown
           
          COMMENTS  :  The West Contra Costa Healthcare District operates 
          Doctors Medical Center (DMC) in San Pablo, California, serving a 
          disproportionately underprivileged community in the cities of 
          Richmond, El Cerrito, San Pablo, Pinole, Hercules and portions 
          of unincorporated Contra Costa County.  The District faces 
          severe financial problems due to the extremely high level of 
          uninsured and underinsured patients, most of whom access DMC 
          through its Emergency Room, which receives over 40,000 visits 








                                                                  SB 644
                                                                  Page  3

          annually.

          In June of 2004, the District passed a parcel tax that produces 
          just under $6,000,000 per year in revenues.

          The District filed for relief under Chapter 9 bankruptcy in 2006 
          and emerged from bankruptcy thereafter.  The plan of 
          reorganization under which the District emerged from bankruptcy 
          was based on a number of factors, including an ongoing funding 
          by California Medical Assistance Commission ("CMAC") of 
          $12,000,000 per year by means of inter-governmental transfers.  

          As a result of a change in the rules governing allocation of 
          inter-governmental transfers by CMAC, funding for the District 
          declined by approximately $11,000,000 and the District again 
          finds itself on the financial brink.

          The District has received a property tax advance of 
          approximately $10,000,000 from Contra Costa County which is 
          being repaid with 100% of the ad valorem tax allocation to the 
          District over the next three to four years. 

          The District has determined that it will need to generate an 
          additional $10,000,000 in the immediate future in order to 
          sustain its operations or, in the alternative, meet all of its 
          financial obligations (largely to its employees in the form of 
          wages and benefits) in connection with an orderly closure of 
          DMC.

          The District is optimistic that funding from a variety of 
          sources including CMAC, other regional health care institutions, 
          an additional parcel tax, and savings from improving operating 
          efficiencies will be sufficient to insure the continuing 
          operations of the District.  Every plan for continuing 
          operations of the District includes an infusion of $10,000,000 
          from new COPs secured by the existing parcel tax and there is no 
          practical way for DMC to continue in existence without the 
          $10,000,000 financing.

          In addition, the District desires to use the new COPs financing 
          to accelerate the repayment of the County's $10,000,000 property 
          tax advance in order to free up the ad valorem revenue for 
          operations.  The ad valorem property tax revenue cannot be 
          pledged to the COPs in the same secure way that the parcel tax 
          can be pledged, and therefore, it is more efficient from a 








                                                                  SB 644
                                                                  Page  4

          financing perspective to leverage the parcel tax for both the 
          county obligations and the $10,000,000 cash infusion.  Finally, 
          the financing of the payment of the County's tax advance over a 
          number of years will increase overall cash flow for the District 
          over the critical next few years.

          SB 644 would create a statutory lien against the existing parcel 
          tax revenue which will provide underwriters assurance that the 
          District's pledge of a portion of its parcel tax revenue to 
          support the COPs cannot be set aside by a Bankruptcy Court.  
          According to the District's financial analyst, the addition of a 
          statutory lien against the parcel tax is necessary to meet the 
          demands of the market place and give underwriter needed 
          sureties; without this the financing is unlikely to be 
          successful.  The District needs to complete this financing this 
          year, as otherwise it is in danger of running out of cash and 
          not being able to meet its obligations to employees, vendors and 
          other creditors; thus the measure has an urgency clause. 
           
          Support arguments  :  Supporters could argue that the District 
          needs to complete this financing this year, as otherwise it is 
          in danger of running out of cash and not being able to meet its 
          obligations to employees, vendors and other creditors.  A 
          statutory lien will provide the market with greater assurance 
          that the debt will be repaid.

           Opposition arguments  :  Opposition could argue that even with the 
          statutory lien the District could still find issuing the COPs 
          difficult. 
           
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
            Association of California Healthcare Districts
          CA Nurses Association 
          West Contra Costa Healthcare District

           Opposition 
           
          None on file 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Katie Kolitsos / L. GOV. / (916) 
          319-3958 









                                                                  SB 644
                                                                  Page  5