BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 671
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 17, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 671 (Price) - As Amended: May 18, 2011
Policy Committee: Business and
Professions Vote: 8 - 1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill establishes continuing education requirements as a
condition for state license renewal of all court reporters.
Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires the Court Reporters Board of California to establish
the continuing education requirements, by July 1, 2012.
2)Requires the board to establish a procedure for approving
providers of continuing education courses.
FISCAL EFFECT
Costs associated with this legislation would be minor and
absorbable within existing resources.
COMMENTS
1)Background and Purpose . There are two types of certified
shorthand reporters: those who work as employees of the court
system and freelance reporters who report depositions. In
order to qualify for licensure, all reporters must attend one
of the 16 California schools authorized by the board and pass
two written exams and a performance exam. Currently, only
reporters employed by the courts are required by the Judicial
Council to take continuing education courses, which are
intended to ensure these reporters maintain a high level of
professionalism, including technical skills and knowledge of
the constantly changing relevant statutes. There is no similar
requirement for freelance reporters, which creates an inequity
in the professional standards of the licensee.
SB 671
Page 2
This bill closes a loophole in the licensing requirements by
mandating that all reporters update their skills through
continuing education, consistent with standards adopted by the
board.
2)Related Legislation . A substantially similar bill, AB 2189
(Karnette) of 2008 would have required the Board to establish
continuing education requirements for renewal of a shorthand
reporter certificate. This bill was vetoed. In his veto
message, Gov. Schwarzenegger noted, "The proposed continuing
education requirements in this bill impose an additional
burden on the regulated profession without justifying a
compelling need."
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081