BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                          SB 703 (Hernandez)
          
          Hearing Date: 5/26/2011         Amended: 3/30/2011
          Consultant: Katie Johnson       Policy Vote: Health 6-3
          
















































          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: SB 703 would establish the Basic Health Program 
          and would require the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board to 
          administer it, in accordance with the basic health program 
          option created by federal health care reform.
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2011-12      2012-13       2013-14     Fund
           Start-up funding       unknown, likely in the millions 
          ofGeneral*
                                 dollars annually

          Ongoing cost to        likely in the billions of dollars 
          annually               Federal/**
          operate BHP                                             Private

          *Permits a General Fund loan to be repaid by July 1, 2016, with 
          interest.
          **BHP funded by federal funds and subscriber premiums.
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
          
          This bill would establish the Basic Health Program (BHP) and 
          would provide that it would be administered by the Managed Risk 
          Medical Insurance Board (MRMIB). Enrollment would commence 
          January 1, 2014. MRMIB would be required to, among other duties, 
          do the following:
             1)   Determine eligibility criteria for, participation 
               requirements of eligible individuals in, and the scope of 
               coverage for individuals enrolled in BHP;
             2)   Determine participation requirements of participating 
               health plans;
             3)   Determine, through negotiation with health plans, 
               premium and cost-sharing amounts, and collect premiums;
             4)   Maintain enrollment and expenditures to ensure that 
               expenditures do not exceed amounts available in the fund, 
               and if sufficient funds are not available to cover the 
               estimated cost of the program, institute appropriate 
               measures to reduce costs;
             5)   Issue rules and regulations; until January 1, 2016, any 
               rules and regulations may be adopted as emergency 








          SB 703 (Hernandez)
          Page 3


               regulations;
             6)   Make application assistance payments to Certified 
               Application Assistants who successfully enroll eligible 
               individuals in BHP.

          MRMIB currently administers several health care coverage 
          programs, including the Healthy Families Program (Healthy 
          Families). This bill would provide that the BHP be administered 
          in conjunction with Healthy Families; MRMIB would be required to 
          provide an eligibility and enrollment process that would permit 
          an individual or his or her parent or guardian, as specified, to 
          enroll in the BHP at the same time an individual or his or her 
          parent or guardian applies for enrollment in Healthy Families. 

          On May 16, Governor Brown released his May Revision of the 
          proposed FY 2011-2012 state budget. In it, he proposes to 
          dissolve MRMIB and provide that all of the existing MRMIB 
          programs be administered by the Department of Health Care 
          Services, California's Medicaid agency. If that change is 
          adopted, this bill would need to be amended to designate an 
          administrator for BHP.

          Federal Law-Basic Health Program Option
          Existing federal law, section 1331of the Patient Protection and 
          Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148), as amended by the federal 
          Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 
          111-152), grants states the option to establish a Basic Health 
          Program that would provide health care coverage for low-income 
          individuals. Eligibility would be limited to individuals who:

             1)   Are not eligible for Medicaid, aged 65 or over;
             2)   Have family incomes between 133 and 200 percent of the 
               federal poverty level (FPL);
             3)   Are legal aliens with family incomes below 133 percent 
               FPL; or,
             4)   Have access to employer-sponsored insurance that does 
               not provide minimum essential coverage or is unaffordable, 
               as specified.

          Federal law provides that the federal government would provide 
          the following monetary subsidies to states with BHPs:

             1)   95 percent of premium subsidies that the federal 
               government would have paid to individuals with incomes 








          SB 703 (Hernandez)
          Page 4


               between 133 and 200 percent FPL purchasing health care 
               coverage within state Health Benefit Exchanges;
             2)   The cost-sharing subsidy that would otherwise go to 
               members of the Exchange.

          Basic Health Programs must:

             1)   Cover at least the minimum essential health benefits 
               specified in the ACA;
             2)   Provide that member premiums cannot exceed the premium 
               of the second-lowest-cost silver plan offered in the 
               Exchange;
             3)   Cost-sharing may not exceed that of platinum level plans 
               for individuals with incomes between 133 and 150 percent 
               FPL and gold level for individuals with incomes between 151 
               and 200 percent FPL.

          State Basic Health Program Benefit and Financial Design
          The federal government would provide California generous 
          monetary assistance were it to establish a BHP pursuant to this 
          bill; however, there could be significant financial risk to the 
          state in the event that the following components are not 
          properly balanced.

           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Source of Funds              |Uses of Funds                      |
          |-----------------------------+-----------------------------------|
          |95% of federal premium       |Service cost for BHP coverage      |
          |credits                      |                                   |
          |-----------------------------+-----------------------------------|
          |Federal cost-sharing subsidy |Risk charge                        |
          |-----------------------------+-----------------------------------|
          |BHP member premium           |BHP administration                 |
          |-----------------------------+-----------------------------------|
          |BHP member cost-sharing      |Additional benefits or higher      |
          |                             |provider payments                  |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          *Figure 1, Page 3, Healthcare Reform and the Basic Health 
          Program Option, Jeremy Palmer, FSA, MAAA of Milliman.

          The "state risk" equals �Cost of State BHP - (95 percent of 
          federal premium credits + federal cost-sharing subsidy + member 
          premium + member cost-sharing)]. Since this bill prohibits the 
          use of General Fund monies for the purposes of BHP, it is 








          SB 703 (Hernandez)
          Page 5


          unclear which state fund would cover the cost of California's 
          BHP in the event that it exceeds the federal subsidies and 
          member contributions.

          On May 12, 2011, the California HealthCare Foundation (CHCF) 
          released the, "State of California Financial Feasibility of a 
          Basic Health Program Option." CHCF concluded that federal 
          subsidies, with appropriate subscriber premiums, would be 
          sufficient to cover the cost of BHP up to 20 percent - 25 
          percent of current Medi-Cal provider reimbursement rates at no 
          extra cost to the General Fund. CHCF assumed 70 percent of an 
          estimated 723,418 eligible individuals would enroll in BHP.

          This bill would create the Basic Health Program Trust Fund and 
          would continuously appropriate it for the purposes of these 
          provisions. Since there is a potential financial risk to the 
          state in the event that the cost of the BHP exceeds the 
          available federal and member contributions, staff recommends 
          that the monies in the fund be made available upon appropriation 
          by the Legislature.

          The proposed committee amendments would:
             1)   Delete the continuous appropriation and make monies in 
               the fund available upon appropriation by the Legislature;
             2)   Permit federal funds and subscriber premiums to be 
               available for expenditure when the annual Budget Act is not 
               enacted by June 30 of any given year to ensure that 
               individuals receiving coverage through the BHP are able to 
               comply with the requirement in the ACA to maintain minimum 
               essential coverage;
             3)   Require participating health plans to assume full risk 
               for the cost of care for the contract period and would 
               prohibit the board from contracting with a health plan if 
               such a contract would result in costs exceeding the funds 
               available.