BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 723
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 6, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 723 (Pavley) - As Amended: May 2, 2011
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill expands the court's authority regarding restraining
orders in domestic violence cases, authorizing a court to issue
a protective order for up to 10 years, regardless of the
sentence.
FISCAL EFFECT
Unknown, likely minor state and local costs to the extent this
bill results in longer restraining orders, which could result in
additional probation and parole violations and/or contempt
proceedings. (Domestic violence victims can currently seek
similar protection in Family Court.)
COMMENTS
Rationale . According to the bill sponsor, the California
District Attorneys Association (CDAA), when a defendant is
sentenced to probation for domestic violence, the court may
issue a protective order during the term of probation. If the
court sentences the defendant to prison or jail, however, or
otherwise denies probation, the court can only issue a
protective order if the case is a violation of PC 273.5 (causing
a traumatic condition on spouse, cohabitant or parent of your
child) or PC 646.9 (stalking).
This means that for other domestic violence crimes, if the
defendant is denied probation, the initial protective order
terminates because the case is over. The criminal court cannot
issue a new protective order because the defendant was not
placed on probation. The victim who had previously had a
SB 723
Page 2
no-contact order now needs to apply with the Family Court to get
a restraining order, the basis of which is the criminal case.
According to the author and the sponsor, victims should get the
same protection in all domestic violence cases, whether or not
the defendant is placed on probation, not just for the crimes of
stalking and causing a traumatic condition to a cohabitant.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081