BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   September 9, 2011

                            ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
                              William W. Monning, Chair
                  SB 791 (Simitian) - As Amended:  September 9, 2011
          
          AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED

           SENATE VOTE  :  Not relevant
           
          SUBJECT  :  Healing arts: mammograms.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires health facilities at which mammography 
          examinations are performed to provide a specified notice to 
          patients who have dense breast tissue.  Specifically,  this bill  : 
             

          1)Requires a health facility at which a mammography examination 
            is performed to include a specified notice in the summary of 
            the written report sent to the patient, if the patient is 
            categorized by the facility as having heterogeneously dense 
            breasts or extremely dense breasts based on the Breast Imaging 
            Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) established by the 
            American College of Radiology (ACR).

          2)Specifies that the notice required in 1) above must state, 
            "Because your mammogram demonstrates that you have dense 
            breast tissue, which could hide small abnormalities, you might 
            benefit from supplementary screening tests, depending on your 
            individual risk factors.  A report of your mammography 
            results, which contains information about your breast density, 
            has been sent to your physician's office and you should 
            contact your physician if you have any questions or concerns 
            about this notice."

          3)Requires the provisions of this bill to become operative on 
            April 1, 2012.

          4)Prohibits, prior to April 1, 2012, this bill from being 
            construed to create or impose liability on a health care 
            facility for failing to comply with its requirements.

          5)Repeals this section on January 1, 2018 unless a later enacted 
            statute deletes or extends that date. 









                                                                 SB 791
                                                                  Page  2

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Under federal regulations implementing the Mammography Quality 
            Standards Act, requires each facility that performs a 
            mammography to send a report to the referring physician that 
            includes specified information.  A letter must also be sent to 
            the patient informing her of the results of the mammogram.

          2)Requires health plans, individual or group disability 
            insurance policies, and self-insured employee welfare benefit 
            plans to provide coverage for mammograms, upon the referral of 
            a physician, nurse practitioner, or certified nurse-midwife, 
            for breast cancer screening and diagnostic purposes.

          3)Requires individual or group disability insurance policies and 
            self-insured employee welfare benefit plans, upon referral, to 
            provide: a baseline mammogram for women ages 35 through 39, 
            inclusive; a mammogram for women ages 40 through 49, 
            inclusive, every two years or more, based on a physician's 
            recommendation; and, a mammogram every year for women age 50 
            and over.

          4)Licenses and regulates physicians and surgeons under the 
            Medical Board of California.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee analysis of SB 173 (Simitian), a substantially similar 
          bill, the fiscal impact of this bill will be the following:

          1)Fiscal impact on state-funded health programs is likely as a 
            result of this bill.  The provision of this bill that notifies 
            women with dense breasts that they might benefit from 
            supplemental screening tests (such as breast MRI (BMRI) and 
            ultrasound) is likely to result in increased patient demand 
            for these tests, which is likely to increase their 
            utilization.  The magnitude of the impact is uncertain.  The 
            specificity and personalized nature of the notice, as well as 
            the provision of the notice along with mammography test 
            results, would seem to increase the perceived relevance of the 
            notice and likelihood of a woman contacting her physician to 
            request supplemental screening. 

          2)If 5% of women who receive this notice are referred for and 
            receive supplemental screening in the form of a breast 
            ultrasound, and have follow-up procedures typical for this 








                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  3

            screening, a conservative estimate of the approximate cost 
            impacts is as follows (this estimate does not include costs 
            for BMRI, which generally requires prior authorization).

             a)   Costs of $1.5 million (50% General Fund (GF)/50% federal 
               funds) to the Medi-Cal Program.
             b)   Cost pressure of $700,000 (GF) on the Every Woman Counts 
               Program. 
             c)   Cost pressure of $1 million (55% GF/45% other funds) for 
               CalPERS state employee health benefits. 
             d)   Cost pressure to private health care service plans and 
               insurers in the range of $20 million. 

          1)Opponents of this bill indicate that in Connecticut, where a 
            similar bill was passed in 2009, it has become standard 
            practice to refer all women who receive this notice to 
            supplemental screening.  If this occurred in California as a 
            result of this bill, or if more than 5% of women received 
            supplemental screening, costs could be greater than presented 
            here.  

           COMMENTS  :

           1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL  .  According to the author, the National 
            Cancer Institute (NCI) estimates that one in eight women will 
            develop breast cancer in their lifetime.  The author maintains 
            that women with dense breast tissue are at four to six times 
            greater risk of developing breast cancer compared to women of 
            the same age and health.  The author cites a Mayo Clinic study 
            from January 2011 which reports that because dense breast 
            tissue is white on a mammogram and cancer is white on a 
            mammogram, 75% of cancer is missed in women with dense breast 
            tissue by mammography alone.  The author maintains while 
            federal law requires that a radiologist performing a mammogram 
            send a letter regarding the results to the patient and a 
            report to the referring physician, only the report to the 
            referring physician must contain information about the 
            patient's breast density.  A national survey, according to the 
            author, found that 95% of women do not know their breast 
            density and that doctors have spoken to less than 9% of 
            patients about breast density.  The author argues that the 
            lack of information provided to the patient regarding breast 
            density leaves the patient with a gap in information that can 
            be misleading for women with dense breast tissue.  This bill, 
            the author asserts, will lead to more women surviving breast 








                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  4

            cancer by helping to catch cancer early when it is most 
            treatable and curable.
           
          2)BREAST CANCER PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS  .  According to the 
            California Cancer Registry (CCR), breast cancer is the most 
            common cancer diagnosed in California, with nearly 24,000 new 
            cases and more than 4,200 deaths expected in 2011.  An average 
            newborn girl's chance of eventually being diagnosed with 
            invasive breast cancer in California is approximately 12%, or 
            one in eight.  Nearly 300,000 women are currently living with 
            breast cancer in California.  

           CCR reports that, although breast cancer is the most common 
            cancer found among women in California, when diagnosed early, 
            survival rates are high.  In California, 71% of breast cancer 
            is diagnosed in the early stages.  Among California women, the 
            five-year relative survival rate for breast cancer is 91%; 
            this rate varies with the stage at diagnosis with a 99% 
            five-year relative survival rate for localized breast cancer, 
            85% for regional breast cancer, and 25% for distant breast 
            cancer.  

           A sustained decrease in breast cancer mortality in the United 
            States and California during the last 20 years is attributed, 
            in part, to the increased use of mammography screening during 
            the 1980s, as well as improvements in treatments and reduction 
            of hormone-replacement therapy.  

           Many factors have been associated with an increased risk of 
            breast cancer.  Some of these factors include a family history 
            of breast or ovarian cancer, a personal history of breast or 
            ovarian cancer, prior benign biopsy, personal history of 
            atypical ductal hyperplasia, radiation exposure, high breast 
            density, hormone therapy use, oral contraceptive use, later 
            age of birth of first child (or no children), early age at 
            menarche, and being overweight or obese in menopausal women. 

          According to the American Congress of Obstetricians and 
            Gynecologists, District IX - California (ACOG), high breast 
            density by itself is not a recognized risk factor that is 
            included in professional guidelines.  According to the 
            California Radiological Society (CRS), there is debate within 
            the scientific community as to the relationship between breast 
            density and breast cancer risk.  CRS states that it seems that 
            women with extremely dense breasts are at some increased risk 








                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  5

            compared to those with very fatty breasts but most women fall 
            in between these two extremes.  
          
          3)BREAST DENSITY  .  According to NCI, breast tissue is composed 
            mainly of the connective tissue, ducts of the milk glands, and 
            fat cells.  A breast is said to be dense if it consists mostly 
            of connective and ductal tissue rather than fatty tissue.  
            While fat appears black on a mammogram and provides good 
            contrast for cancers which appear white on the mammogram, the 
            connective and ductal tissue also appears white, and therefore 
            can disguise or mimic cancers.  Dense tissue is particularly 
            difficult in that even a small area of density can obscure a 
            small cancer.

          NCI states that a woman's tissue density varies over her 
            lifetime and it is a common condition found in over one-third 
            of women over the age of 40, and over half of those aged 
            40-50.  The underlying causes of breast density are mostly 
            inherited.  Higher breast density is more common in some 
            ethnic groups, including white women.  It is also more common 
            in younger women, beginning when hormones kick in during 
            puberty and continuing through the childbearing years.
           
          4)BREAST CANCER SCREENINGS  .  There are three modalities that are 
            used to screen asymptomatic women for breast cancer:  
            mammography, BMRI, and ultrasound.  A new modality, breast 
            tomosynthesis (also referred to as three-dimensional 
            mammography), was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug 
            Administration.  

          In 2009, the United States Preventive Services Task Force 
            (USPSTF), a group of experts that makes recommendations on 
            policies to prevent diseases, issued revised guidelines for 
            mammography recommending biennial mammography screenings 
            beginning at age 50 instead of 40.  Leading cancer 
            organizations, including the American Cancer Society (ACS), 
            the Mayo Clinic, the Susan G. Komen for the Cure, and the 
            National Breast Cancer Foundation, however, did not change 
            their policies of recommending annual mammography screenings 
            for women when they turn 40 years old.  According to the chief 
            medical officer of ACS, the organization continues to 
            recommend annual screening using mammography and clinical 
            breast examination for all women beginning at age 40.  He 
            further states that ACS experts make this recommendation 
            having reviewed virtually all the same data reviewed by the 








                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  6

            USPSTF, but also additional data that the USPSTF did not 
            consider.  

           The ACR's BI-RADS is one of the principal methods used for 
            mammography assessment and contains standardized numerical 
            codes assigned by a radiologist after interpreting a 
            mammogram.  The assessment categories were developed for 
            mammography and later adapted for BMRI and ultrasound.  Breast 
            density composition categories are classified as follows:  
              a)   0: Incomplete;  
              b)   1: Almost entirely fat (< 25% fibroglandular density);  
              c)   2: Scattered fibroglandular densities (approx. 25% - 50% 
               fibroglandular density);  
              d)   3: Heterogeneously dense (approx. 51%-75% fibroglandular 
               density); or,  
              e)   4: Extremely dense (>75% fibroglandular density).  

             The subjectivity of density measurement has been the matter of 
            some concern for those in the field for many years.  Research 
            indicates that technology is currently being developed for a 
            measurement tool of breast density that is more qualitative 
            than subjective.

           5)OTHER STATES  .  The State of Connecticut passed a law similar 
            to this bill in 2009.  The Connecticut legislation mandates 
            insurance coverage of comprehensive ultrasound screening of an 
            entire breast or breasts if a mammogram demonstrates 
            heterogeneous or dense breast tissue.  The Connecticut law 
            also provides that: 

          Each mammography report provided to a patient shall include 
            information about breast density, based on the BI-RADS 
            established by the ACR.  Where applicable, such report shall 
            include the following notice:  "If your mammogram demonstrates 
            that you have dense breast tissue, which could hide small 
            abnormalities, you might benefit from supplemental screening 
            tests, which can include a breast ultrasound screening or a 
            BMRI examination, or both, depending on your individual risk 
            factors.  A report of your mammography results, which contains 
            information about your breast density has been sent to your 
            physician's office and you should contact your physician if 
            you have any questions or concerns about the report."  

          According to the author, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, 
            Florida, and Texas all have similar legislation pending.








                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  7


           6)OPPOSED  .  ACOG writes in opposition to this bill that there is 
            no clear evidence that the additional screening and procedures 
            expected to be triggered by this bill will make a significant 
            difference in the numbers of early detections and survival 
            rates.  ACOG also indicates that a similar law was passed in 
            Connecticut, and asserts that given the uncertainty of the 
            evidence, it makes sense to wait for an evaluation of the 
            outcomes from that law to determine if this type of notice to 
            patients, and the subsequent additional studies which 
            followed, helped to identify additional cancers and saved 
            lives before we implement such a significant system change in 
            California.

           7)OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED  .  The California Medical Association 
            (CMA) is opposed unless amended to this bill.  CMA states that 
            there is not sufficient consensus in the medical community 
            regarding the definition of breast density or guidelines for 
            supplemental screening for those categorized as having dense 
            breasts.  CMA argues that this bill implies that such a 
            standard does indeed exist, creating a potential legal 
            liability for physicians to provide other types of care such 
            as further screenings beyond mammograms, including breast 
            ultrasounds and MRIs.  CMA requests that all women receiving 
            mammograms - not just those categorized at density levels '3' 
            or '4' - receive the notice.  CMA poses the question that if 
            no consensus exists in the medical community about how the 
            condition of density, in and of itself, impacts a woman's care 
            and screening, how then is it appropriate to decide that only 
            some women, not all, are provided with information about their 
            density level?

          CMA states that currently, national medical practice protocols 
            require information about breast density to be included in the 
            patient's mammography report provided to the referring 
            physician from the radiologist.  CMA maintains that using this 
            information in combination with their knowledge of the 
            patient's personal history, including other risk factors, the 
            primary treating physician can then make a decision regarding 
            the best course of action or follow-up.  CMA maintains that 
            these decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.

          CMA asserts that density is actually a common condition and 
            approximately 10% of women fall into the lower category of 
            density, or level '1,' also referred to as "extremely fatty."  








                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  8

            Beyond that, according to CMA, 90% of women are categorized as 
            having a level of density between levels '2' ("scattered 
            density") and '4' ("extremely dense"), all of which could 
            possibly obscure abnormalities in a mammogram.  CMA argues 
            that when a condition is present in the majority of the 
            population, a notice about it should indicate that fact.  

          CMA also argues that determining the level of density present is 
            also inherently subjective, and can vary from physician to 
            physician.  This, CMA maintains, presents a liability problem 
            when coupled with the bill's requirement that only women 
            categorized as a level '3' or '4' of density receive the 
            notice.  As a result of these concerns, CMA is requesting the 
            following amendments:

             a)   Insert language as used in the Texas law regarding 
               standards of care.

             "Notwithstanding any other law, this section does not create 
               a cause of action or create a standard of care, obligation, 
               or duty that provides a basis for cause of action."  

              b)   Insert sentence in the mandatory notice regarding the 
               subjectivity of density determination.
              
              "The determination of the level of breast density is a 
               subjective determination which may vary among 
               radiologists."  
                 
              c)   Add context language to text of notice regarding breast 
               density.

             "Density breast tissue, in and of itself, is a relatively 
               common condition.  Therefore, this information is not 
               provided to cause undue concern, but rather to raise your 
               awareness and to promote discussion with your physician 
               regarding the presence of other risk factors, in addition 
               to dense breast tissue."  
                 
              d)   Make the notice apply to all women receiving mammograms.

             e)   Add information about the patient's density grade to the 
               text of the notice.

             Require that the mandatory notice include information 








                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  9

               regarding the patient's density level as determined by the 
               radiologist, likely in both number form (1-4) as well as 
               lay language ("Entirely Fatty"/ "Scattered Density"/ 
               "Heterogeneously Dense"/ "Extremely Dense") since the 
               notice, (if amendment d) above is taken) will not be sent 
               to all women.

           8)RELATED LEGISLATION  .   

              a)   SB 173 (Simitian) was substantially similar to this 
               bill.  SB 173 was held in the Assembly Appropriations 
               Committee on the suspense file.
                
              b)   AB 137 (Portantino) requires health plan contracts and 
               health insurance policies that are issued, amended, 
               delivered, or renewed, on or after July 1, 2012, to provide 
               coverage for mammography for screening or diagnostic 
               purposes upon referral by a health care professional, based 
               on medical need, regardless of age.  AB 137 was held in the 
               Assembly Appropriations Committee.  
           
           9)PREVIOUS LEGISLATION  .  
           
             a)   AB 113 (Portantino) of 2010 was identical to AB 137.  
               Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 113, stating, in part, 
               that it was unnecessary and had no practical impact on the 
               current state of health coverage in California.  

              b)   AB 56 (Portantino) of 2009 contained provisions 
               identical to those in AB 113.  AB 56 was vetoed by Governor 
               Schwarzenegger.  In his veto address he stated, in part, 
               "The addition of a new mandate, no matter how small, will 
               only serve to increase the overall cost of health care." 

             c)   AB 2234 (Portantino) of 2008 would have required health 
               plans and health insurers to provide coverage for tests 
               necessary for screening or diagnoses of breast conditions, 
               in accordance with national guidelines, upon referral of a 
               specified health care provider and required health plans 
               and health insurers to notify female enrollees or 
               policyholders in writing of their eligibility for testing.  
               AB 2234 was held in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :









                                                                  SB 791
                                                                  Page  10

           Support 
           
          None on file.
           
            Opposition 
           
          California Medical Association (unless amended)
          American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Tanya Robinson-Taylor / HEALTH / (916) 
          319-2097