BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS
LOU CORREA, CHAIRMAN
Bill No: SB 812
Author: Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs
Version: As Introduced
Hearing Date: April 12, 2011
Fiscal: No
Consultant: Donald E. Wilson
SUBJECT OF BILL
POW/MIA Flag
PROPOSED LAW
Establish protocols within the State of California for the
proper display of the POW/MIA flag.
EXISTING LAW AND BACKGROUND
1. There is no existing California law on the display of
the POW/MIA Flag.
2. Occasionally the Department of General Services (DGS)
is harassed by individuals claiming that the POW/MIA
Flag is improperly displayed when it is flown below the
California Republic Flag.
3. United States Code 36, Subtitle 1, Part A, Chapter 9,
Section 902 further subsection "f" states "Display of
the POW/MIA flag pursuant to this section shall be in a
manner designed to ensure visibility to the public."
COMMENT
1. Federal law used to say that the POW/MIA Flag shall
fly below the national flag. Some interpreted this to mean
immediately below the Federal Flag; however, that was not
what the law said.
2. The Federal Code was silent on state flag etiquette for
the obvious reason that state flags are the concern of
state governments and not the Federal Government.
3. In the words of Flagguys.com "The US Flag Code is
silent on the POW flag specifically or on the matter of
state flags taking precedence over non US flags. So I find
no help there. It only establishes that the US flag takes
first position."
4. States are sovereign geo-political entities and the
soldier, sailor, airmen, and marines who serve do so for
the preservation of those geo-political entities- not
vice-versa.
5. Individuals -no matter how noble or extreme their
sacrifice-do not outrank the sovereignty of the republic
either at the Federal or State level. That idea is foreign
to any interpretation of republicanism and hence, why the
federal law has never directed that the POW/MIA Flag be
flown directly below the American Flag.
6. Some groups who have admirably not forgotten their
comrades have set up "protocols" that proliferate on web
sites, but these protocols have no basis in the law and are
simply a reflection of members' opinions of what they would
like to see happen.
SUPPORT
None received
OPPOSE
None received
Page 2