BILL ANALYSIS �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER |
| Senator Fran Pavley, Chair |
| 2011-2012 Regular Session |
| |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BILL NO: SB 825 HEARING DATE: January 10,
2012
AUTHOR: Corbett URGENCY: No
VERSION: January 5, 2012 CONSULTANT: Marie Liu
DUAL REFERRAL: No FISCAL: Yes
SUBJECT: State Parks and Recreation
BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
The Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) may issue
publications giving information regarding its activities,
powers, duties, and functions. Under Section 512 of the Public
Resources Code, all monies generated from the sale of these
publications must be deposited into the General Fund.
The State Parks and Recreation Fund primarily receives revenues
from fees charged at parks. This fund is used for the operation
of state parks.
PROPOSED LAW
This bill would require that revenues from publication sales be
deposited into the State Parks and Recreation Fund instead of
the General Fund.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
The author references the pending park closures as a result of
budget cuts and states, "Every park closed harms our tourism
industry and robs Californians of the opportunity to enjoy these
beautiful places. SB 825 is a small but important way to give
State Parks a tool to be more self-sufficient with their
funding. Shifting �deposits from publication sales] will give
State Parks more incentive to create more revenue from
publications and thereby more funding for parks."
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION
None received.
COMMENTS
According to DPR, most of the publications published by the DPR
1
are informational (maps, brochures) and are given away for free.
The vast majority of the publications available for purchase are
published by cooperating associations (e.g. Friends of �blank]
State Park), who may keep the revenues so long as the monies are
reinvested into the park. This bill will not significantly
increase the balance of the State Parks and Recreation Fund;
however, the author's intent is to encourage DPR to be more
entrepreneurial by allowing them to reap the rewards of creating
profitable publications.
SUPPORT
None Received
OPPOSITION
None Received
2