BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 834|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 834
          Author:   Wolk (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/25/11 
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE NATURAL RES. & WATER COMMITTEE  :  5-3, 4/12/11
          AYES:  Pavley, Evans, Kehoe, Padilla, Wolk
          NOES:  La Malfa, Cannella, Fuller
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Simitian

          SENATE FLOOR  :  24-14, 5/19/11
          AYES:  Alquist, Blakeslee, Calderon, Corbett, Correa, De 
            Le�n, DeSaulnier, Evans, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Lieu, Liu, 
            Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Rubio, 
            Steinberg, Vargas, Wolk, Wright, Yee
          NOES:  Anderson, Berryhill, Cannella, Dutton, Emmerson, 
            Fuller, Gaines, Harman, Huff, La Malfa, Runner, 
            Strickland, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hernandez, Simitian

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  51-26, 8/30/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Integrated regional water management plans

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires that an Integrated Regional 
          Water Management Plan (IRWMP) that is voluntarily drafted 
          so as to meet certain minimum requirements in order to be 
          eligible for state funding must, for a region that depends 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page 
          2

          on water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta), 
          also include an identification of the way the IRWMP will 
          further the statewide policy of reducing reliance on the 
          Delta through investments in regional self-reliance. 

           Assembly Amendments  (1) add a legislative finding which 
          restates a provision in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta 
          Reform Act of 2009 (Delta Reform Act) holding that no 
          provision of that Act diminishes, impairs, or otherwise 
          affects water rights protections provided under the law, 
          (2) delete language stating that an entity must comply with 
          Water Code Section 85021 of the Delta Reform Act and 
          instead insert language stating that an entity must further 
          the statewide policy of Section 85021, and (3) specify that 
          furthering the statewide policy found in Water Code Section 
          85021 will be met utilizing the methods enumerated in 
          Section 85021:  water use efficiency; water recycling; 
          advanced water technologies; local and regional water 
          supply projects; and improved regional coordination of 
          local and regional water supply projects.

           ANALYSIS  :    Under the Integrated Regional Water Management 
          Planning Act of 2002, a regional water management group is 
          authorized, but not required, to prepare and adopt an 
          IRWMP.  The Act defined a "regional water management group" 
          as three or more local agencies, at least two of which have 
          statutory authority over water supply or water management, 
          plus those other persons who may be necessary to develop 
          and implement an IRWMP.  Much, but not all, of the state is 
          covered by one or more IRWMPs.

          This bill:

          1. Makes legislative findings restating provisions of the 
             Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 (Delta 
             Reform Act), including that: 

             A.    There are coequal goals for the Delta of increased 
                water supply reliability and enhanced ecosystem 
                protection and restoration.

             B.    It is the policy of the state to reduce reliance 
                on the Delta in meeting California's future water 
                needs through a statewide strategy of investing in 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page 
          3

                improved regional supplies, conservation, and water 
                use efficiency.
              
             C.    No provision of the Delta Reform Act diminishes, 
                impairs, or otherwise affects water rights 
                protections provided under the law. 

          2. Specifies that the minimum content of an IRWMP eligible 
             for state funding, for a region that depends on water 
             from the Delta, must also include an identification of 
             the way the IRWMP will further the policy of reducing 
             reliance on the Delta by utilizing the approaches 
             specified in the Delta Reform Act. 

           Background  

          The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 (Delta 
          Act), among other things, added Water Code Section 85021.  
          That section established that "�t]he policy of the State of 
          California is to reduce reliance on the Delta in meeting 
          California's future water supply needs through a statewide 
          strategy of investing in improved regional supplies, 
          conservation, and water use efficiency.  Each region that 
          depends on water from the Delta watershed shall improve its 
          regional self-reliance for water through investment in 
          water use efficiency, water recycling, advanced water 
          technologies, local and regional water supply projects, and 
          improved regional coordination of local and regional water 
          supply efforts."

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/30/11)

          Planning and Conservation League
          Sierra Club California


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the Sierra Club, 
          "California Water Code section 85021 ? sets forth that the 
          policy of the state is to reduce reliance on the 
          Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta in meeting the state's future 
          water supply needs ? However, current law does not 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page 
          4

          specifically require any actions to be taken to support 
          this policy.  Also, there is no mechanism requiring any 
          region to report on their progress made towards meeting 
          this goal of reducing reliance on Delta water supplies.  SB 
          834 would remedy this deficiency by requiring regions 
          receiving water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to 
          demonstrate how their Integrated Regional Water Management 
          Plans reduce reliance on the Delta."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  51-26, 08/30/11
          AYES:  Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, Blumenfield, 
            Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles 
            Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Davis, 
            Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, 
            Gatto, Gordon, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hern�ndez, Hill, 
            Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, 
            Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel P�rez, 
            Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, 
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, Fletcher, Beth 
            Gaines, Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Harkey, 
            Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, 
            Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Smyth, Valadao, 
            Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Alejo, Bill Berryhill, Gorell


          CTW:mw  8/30/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          











                                                           CONTINUED