BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 835
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 13, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 835 (Wolk) - As Amended: June 20, 2011
Policy Committee: Business and
Professions Vote: 6-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill extends and expands the University of California's
(UC's) pilot program to award construction contracts based on
"best value" rather than lowest bid. Specifically, this bill:
1)Extends the pilot program sunset date from January 1, 2012 to
January 1, 2017.
2)Expands the pilot program to all UC campuses for construction
projects exceeding $1 million. (The currently program is
limited to projects of any value at the San Francisco campus
(UCSF) only.)
3)Requires the UC Regents to report specified information
regarding the pilot program to the Legislature by January 1,
2016.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Based on the results to date of the pilot program at UCSF, the
university should realize significant annual savings,
potentially in the tens of millions, in contract and contract
administration costs for the next five years.
2)Costs for the required report are minor and absorbable.
COMMENTS
1)Background . SB 667 (Migden)/Chapter 367 of 2006, established
the five-year Best Value Pilot Program at UCSF. Under this
program, UC prequalifies bidders, then evaluates the bid and
SB 835
Page 2
assigns a qualification score based upon five factors, which
include the bidder's financial condition, relevant experience,
demonstrated management competency, labor compliance, and
safety record. UC then divides each bidder's price by its
qualification score, and the lowest resulting cost per quality
point represents the best value bid.
Under this program, UCSF has awarded 30 construction contracts
totaling $960 million (out of 228 contracts totaling $1.3
billion entered into during the same period). According to UC,
the pilot program has demonstrated the following advantages:
a decrease in bid protests, communication problems, disputes,
the need for multiple inspections and rework, change order
requests and claims, and litigation; increased incentives for
contractors to perform high-quality work safely, while
adhering to high-strike standards; increasing likelihood of
contractors staffing a project with their best workers and
selection of subcontractors most appropriate for the work; and
reduced administrative oversight and contract or project
management staff time.
2)Purpose . UC believes that, based on results from the pilot
program to date, expanding the best value program systemwide
will result in savings of at least $30 million annually.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081