BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 906 (DeSaulnier)
Hearing Date: 05/23/2011 Amended: 05/10/2011
Consultant: Jolie Onodera Policy Vote: Public Safety 7-0
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 906 would prohibit the Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), when notified by a
prosecuting attorney or court that two defendants are either
codefendants or co-conspirators in the commission of a violent
felony, from housing those two inmates within sight or sound of
each other and require, to the extent possible, those inmates be
housed in separate facilities.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund
Co-conspirators/codefendant Unknown; significant
operational costs General
placement in excess of $100 annually
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the
Suspense File.
This bill would require that, when notified by a court or
prosecuting attorney that two inmates are either charged as
codefendants or alleged to be co-conspirators in a violent
felony case, when being held in state prison, awaiting trial or
after conviction and sentencing, CDCR may not house those
inmates within sight or sound of each other. Further, this bill
requires, to the extent possible, that those inmates shall be
housed in separate facilities.
The CDCR has indicated that it is their current practice to
separate such prisoners when so notified. However, it may be
difficult to comply with the provisions of this bill at all
times as a practical effect of the transfer of inmates between
facilities, transportation to and from the courts, and movement
of inmates within a facility for various reasons such as medical
appointments. The CDCR indicates under the current state of
prison overcrowding, any restriction to CDCR's ability to house
inmates could significantly increase operational costs and
aggravate the overcrowding. Operational costs could be incurred
for additional custody and transportation of the inmates to
separate reception centers for initial risk and needs assessment
and medical evaluation, as well as to house the inmates at
SB 906 (DeSaulnier)
Page 3
separate facilities while awaiting trial, or after conviction
and sentencing. Further, as condemned inmates must be housed at
San Quentin State Prison or Central California Women's Facility
under existing law, CDCR indicates it would not be possible to
meet the "sight and sound" requirement at those institutions
without incurring substantial costs.
While CDCR follows this practice to the extent possible,
imposing this requirement could create a liability where two
such inmates are housed under circumstances in which they might
come within sight or sound of each other.