BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 960
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 8, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 960 (Rubio) - As Amended: August 6, 2012
Policy Committee: Higher
EducationVote:9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill limits the reallocation of student-approved,
campus-based mandatory fees that are enacted at the California
State University (CSU) after January 1, 2013. Specifically, this
bill, for such fees established through a majority vote of the
students participating in that vote, but not authorized by
statute:
1)Prohibits reallocation of the fee without an affirmative vote
of either a majority of students participating in the vote or
a majority of the campus fee advisory committee participating
in the vote.
2)Allows reallocation of the fee without an affirmative voter as
in (1) if the vote that established the fee authorized an
alternative or automatic reallocation mechanism for that fee.
FISCAL EFFECT
CSU will incur minor and absorbable costs to modify current CSU
fee policies. If reallocation of a campus-based fee, enacted
after the effective date of this bill, required a vote of the
campus student body, the one-time cost would be about $25,000.
The more likely, and less costly approach, would be to seek a
reallocation vote of the campus fee advisory committee.
COMMENTS
1)Background . Campus-based mandatory fees are used to support
on-campus activities such as health facilities and services,
student university unions, athletic programs,
SB 960
Page 2
transit/transportation systems, and recreational
opportunities. State funding is not provided to support these
activities. There is no statutory guiding policy on mandatory
systemwide tuition and fees beyond the current fiscal
condition and the stated needs of CSU and UC, as negotiated in
budget deliberations. Campus-based fees at CSU currently
average $1,047 per year.
2)Purpose . Under its policy, CSU presidents have the authority
to use an alternate consultation process to divert funds
and/or establish campus-based mandatory and
instruction-related fees without consulting the student body.
The author states, "This executive language overrides the
rights of students to self-govern and allocate fees that the
student-body itself established and voted on through a
referendum process. Several student bodies throughout the CSU
system have had their existing fees reallocated or new fees
established without a vote from the student body."
3)Recommended Amendment . The bill should clarify that the
subsequent vote is in regards to the reallocation of the fee.
On page 2, line 11, after "fee" insert "reallocation".
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081