BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          SB 968 (Wright) - Inmates: electronic monitoring.
          
          Amended: April 10, 2012         Policy Vote: Public Safety 7-0
          Urgency: Yes                    Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 14, 2012      Consultant: Jolie Onodera
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: SB 968, an urgency measure, would authorize a 
          defendant arrested without a warrant for a bailable felony 
          punishable by imprisonment in the county jail to apply to the 
          court at the preliminary hearing, or anytime thereafter, for 
          release on reduced bail if the defendant agrees to be placed in 
          an electronic monitoring program, as specified.

          Fiscal Impact: Potential ongoing annual costs of approximately 
          $415,000 to $1.7 million (General Fund) per 10 percent of 
          eligible detained defendants who apply for reduced bail at the 
          preliminary hearing or at a subsequent hearing, respectively. 
          This estimate assumes an additional 15 minutes per preliminary 
          hearing and one hour per separate hearing for 2,500 defendants 
          who otherwise may not have applied for reduced bail under 
          existing law. 

          Background: Existing law permits a county board of supervisors 
          to authorize a county correctional administrator to place county 
          jail inmates who are being held in lieu of bail in a voluntary 
          program of home detention, including electronic monitoring, when 
          certain conditions are met. An eligible inmate must be a 
          low-level offender with no outstanding holds or warrants and 
          must have been held in custody for at least 30 or 60 days on 
          misdemeanor or felony charges, respectively. 

          Under existing law, no court hearing is required for release of 
          an individual pursuant to an electronic monitoring program upon 
          expiration of the specified minimum period in custody. All 
          participants are subject to discretionary review by the 
          correctional administrator. Further, the board of supervisors 
          may prescribe reasonable rules and regulations under which a 
          program may operate. The inmate must agree in writing with the 
          rules and regulations which include required compliance with 








          SB 968 (Wright)
          Page 1


          designated hours of detention and grounds for remanding a 
          participant into custody.

          Proposed Law: This bill would provide that if a person is 
          arrested without a warrant for a bailable offense, and that 
          offense is punishable as a jail felony pursuant to Penal Code 
          section 1170(h), the person may apply to the court at the 
          preliminary hearing, or anytime thereafter, for release on bail 
          reduced by up to 75 percent of the set amount of bail if the 
          defendant agrees to be placed in an electronic monitoring 
          program administered by the county-authorized correctional 
          administrator.

          If the defendant is released on reduced bail and placed in an 
          electronic monitoring program, the name, address, and contact 
          information of any applicable bail agent or surety must be 
          provided to the court and the correctional administrator 
          responsible for providing the electronic monitoring program.

          Prior Legislation: AB 109 (Committee on Budget) Chapter 15/2011, 
          the 2011 Public Safety Realignment bill containing necessary 
          statutory and technical changes to implement changes to the 
          Budget Act of 2011, provided that a county board of supervisors 
          may implement a program of pretrial release on electronic 
          monitoring. This section provided that a felony defendant may 
          not be released on electronic monitoring without bail until he 
          or she has been held in custody for 60 days. 

          AB 1369 (Davis) 2010 would have expanded eligibility for the 
          county jail involuntary home detention program which requires 
          approval by the board of supervisors by deleting the misdemeanor 
          limitation, thereby opening up the optional program to sentenced 
          felony offenders. This bill was vetoed by the Governor with the 
          following message:

          I am returning Assembly Bill 1369 without my signature. This 
          bill would allow the use of voluntary or involuntary electronic 
          monitoring programs for inmates being held in lieu of bail for 
          both misdemeanors and felonies. Although this bill would give 
          counties facing jail overcrowding problems the flexibility to 
          place inmates on electronic monitoring, this bill is 
          fundamentally flawed. Under existing law, if a misdemeanant 
          absconds or flees from a voluntary alternative custody program, 
          he or she is subject to felony prosecution. Under this bill, if 








          SB 968 (Wright)
          Page 2


          a person is charged with a felony and escapes or cuts off their 
          electronic monitoring device while participating in an 
          alternative custody program, he or she can only be prosecuted 
          for a misdemeanor.  A person should not be subject to 
          misdemeanor penalties for evading felony prosecution. For these 
          reasons, I am unable to sign this bill.

          Staff Comments: The provisions of this bill could result in 
          lengthier and/or additional court hearings than otherwise would 
          have occurred under existing law. The Judicial Council indicates 
          the consideration of a request for reduced bail at the 
          preliminary hearing would extend the length of proceedings. 
          Based on an average daily court cost of $4,000, an increased 
          length in proceedings of 15 minutes would incur additional costs 
          of $167 per hearing.

          Approximately 25,000 individuals per year of the total 
          population projected under Realignment would potentially be 
          impacted under the provisions of this bill. For every 10 percent 
          of eligible defendants (25,000 x 0.1) who seek this relief at 
          his/her preliminary hearing, 2,500 defendants per year would 
          result in increased costs of $417,000 (General Fund) per year 
          based on an additional 15 minutes per hearing. Given there does 
          not appear to be a negative 

          To the extent the provisions of this bill result in additional 
          requests for reduced bail at any time after the preliminary 
          hearing than otherwise would not have occurred under existing 
          law, additional court hearings would need to be calendared and 
          adjudicated. Assuming an additional hour for a new hearing would 
          result in increased court costs of $1.6 million (General Fund) 
          per year based on an estimated cost of $667 per hearing for 
          2,500 defendants.