BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1016 (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee)
          As Amended  June 25, 2012
          Majority vote.  Budget Bill Appropriation Takes Effect 
          Immediately 

           SENATE VOTE  :Vote not relevant  
           
           SUMMARY  :  Provides the necessary statutory changes in the area 
          of education in order to enact modifications to the 2011-12 and 
          2012-13 Budget Acts.  Specifically,  this bill  :

           K-12 Provisions
           
          1)Deems $671.8 million paid to schools above the Proposition 98 
            minimum guarantee for 2011-12 as satisfying payment towards 
            the California Teachers Association v. Schwarzenegger 
            settlement.  

          2)Reduces ongoing Proposition 98 funding for special education 
            by $220 million in 2011-12 and backfills with one-time 
            Proposition 98 savings from various programs to cover 2010-11 
            program adjustments.  

          3)Provides a revenue limit deficit factor of 22.549% to reflect 
            a $165 million deficit for county offices of education (COEs). 
             Provides a revenue limit deficit factor of 22.272% to reflect 
            a deficit of $9.1 billion for school districts.  These 
            statutory factors are created to establish the state's intent 
            to repay the K-12 per-pupil reductions in the future, 
            including foregone cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs).

          4)Establishes a zero percent COLA for K-12 programs in 2012-13.  
            Though the actual COLA of 3.24% is not provided, it is applied 
            to the deficit factors established in this measure.  

          5)Makes a trigger reduction of $2.739 billion to school 
            district, COE and charter school revenue limit funding if the 
            Governor's November tax initiative fails.  To achieve this 
            reduction, authorizes a school district, COE or charter school 
            to provide no less than 160 days of instruction, or the 
            equivalent number of instructional minutes, for the 2012-13 
            and 2013-14 school years.  Current law allows districts to 
            provide 175 days of instruction.  Prior to this flexibility, 








                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  2


            districts were required to provide 180 days of instruction.  
            This reduction in the school year is tied to the $2.7 billion 
            trigger reduction.

          6)Specifies that if a district reduces the number of days of 
            instruction, the school year will still constitute a full year 
            of service credit for California State Teachers' Retirement 
            System (CalSTRS) members in that district.

          7)Includes Early Intervention Services Act funding and 
            appropriations to service general obligation bond debt on 
            behalf of schools, COEs, charter schools and community 
            colleges as moneys applied by the state to support schools for 
            the purposes of calculating Proposition 98, only if the 
            Governor's November ballot initiative passes.

          8)Ensures a local education agency's July through May payments 
            of state aid for revenue limit or charter school general 
            purpose funding is reduced by the amount of funding received 
            pursuant to the School's and Local Public Safety Protection 
            Act (estimated to be $6.9 billion).  Any differences between 
            the estimate and actual allocations will be settled-up in the 
            second principal apportionment payment in June (deferred to 
            July).  As a result, the principal apportionment payments will 
            be reduced by approximately $350 million in both July and 
            August, and $620 million each month September through May.

          9)Establishes an inter-year (cross-year) deferral schedule for 
            2012-13 that defers $2.065 billion less from K-12 education if 
            the Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012 is 
            approved by voters in November 2012.  Re-instates the existing 
            cross-year deferral schedule should the ballot initiative 
            fail.

          10)Makes technical changes to ensure that Redevelopment Agency 
            (RDA) tax-increment and liquid asset revenues offset the 
            state's General Fund (GF) requirements for school districts, 
            COE revenue limits and charter school general purpose funding.

          11)Redefines total local property taxes to include RDA tax 
            increment and liquid asset revenues.

          12)Provides additional GF revenues for special education if 
            revenues associated with the dissolution of redevelopment 








                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  3


            agencies assumed in the budget act do not materialize.  This 
            ensures that school districts are held harmless if these 
            revenues come in lower than expected.

          13)Provides $361 million ($313 million for K-12; $48 million for 
            California Community Colleges (CCC)) in Proposition 98 funds 
            for Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) for 2012-13 and 
            $266 million ($218 million for K-12; $48 million for 
            California Community Colleges) for 2013-14.  This is in-lieu 
            of payments that are paid outside of Proposition 98.  

          14)Repeals existing law that requires the state to rebench for 
            the "gas tax swap" adopted by the Legislature in 2011.  This 
            reduces the minimum guarantee by roughly $600 million.  The 
            gas tax swap eliminated the sales tax on gasoline (previously 
            included in the Proposition 98 calculation) and replaced it 
            with an increase in the excise tax on gasoline (excluded from 
            the Proposition 98 calculation).  Absent a rebenching, the 
            minimum guarantee would have decreased due to the loss of gas 
            tax revenues. 

          15)Repeals language that required rebenching of the Proposition 
            98 minimum guarantee related to the dissolution of 
            redevelopment agencies for the 2011-12 fiscal year, but would 
            have prohibited rebenching in the 2012-13 fiscal year for this 
            purpose.  By deleting this language, the state is able to 
            rebench for RDA revenues in 2012-13 and achieve roughly $2.7 
            billion in GF savings. 

          16)Authorizes the California School Finance Authority to 
            refinance revenue bonds issued to finance school facilities 
            working capital and capital improvements, which currently is 
            not explicitly authorized.  This technical change conforms to 
            current practices.

          17)Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to 
            monitor the adequacy of the funds in the Charter School 
            Revolving Loan Fund, and report, as specified, on the need to 
            transfer funds from the Charter School Security Fund to the 
            Charter School Revolving Loan Fund.

          18)Authorizes the board of supervisors of a county or city and 
            county to order the auditor and treasurer to pay funds to a 
            charter school whenever the charter school does not have 








                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  4


            sufficient money to its credit (also known as "dry period 
            financing").  First call on funds paid to the charter school 
            shall go to repaying the borrowed funds.

          19)Authorizes a county superintendent of schools, with approval 
            of the county board of education, to make temporary transfers 
            of funds to charter schools, in the same manner as is 
            currently authorized for school districts.

          20)Establishes a charter school as a local agency for the 
            purpose of issuing in Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes 
            (TRANs).

          21)Authorizes a charter school to directly seek an exemption 
            from the intra-year deferrals and requires the charter 
            authorizer be notified of the request.

          22)Requires the governing board of any school district seeking 
            to sell or lease any real property designed to provide direct 
            instruction or instructional support it deems to be surplus 
            property to first offer that property for sale or lease to any 
            charter school that has submitted a written request to the 
            school district to be notified of any surplus property offered 
            for sale or lease by the district.

          23)Establishes a block grant for the majority of K-14 mandates 
            (continues to suspend K-14 mandates that were suspended in 
            2011-12).  Continues the claiming process but requires school 
            districts, county offices of education, or community college 
            districts to choose annually to either claim or utilize the 
            block grant.  Allows charter schools to receive reimbursement 
            through the block grant.  The Budget Act provides a total of 
            $200 million, allocated on a per pupil/student basis as 
            follows:  i) K-12 districts, $28 per pupil; ii) Community 
            college districts, $28 per student; iii) Charter schools, $14 
            per pupil; and, iv) County offices of education, $28 + $1 
            "extra" per pupil. 

          24)Clarifies that school districts, COEs, state special schools, 
            charter schools and nonpublic, nonsectarian schools are 
            eligible to apply for state Workability I project funds.

          25)Makes technical changes related to the Gann Limit as it 
            relates to categorical flexibility.








                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  5



          26)Suspends the statutory division of Proposition 98 funding 
            among K-12 educational agencies, community colleges, and other 
            state agencies, and instead conform the division of funding 
            based upon actual budget appropriations in 2012-13. 

          27)Makes statutory changes conforming to zero funding for the 
            Emergency Repair Program in 2012-13.  

          28)Authorizes reductions to basic aid districts' categorical 
            funding, proportional to the revenue limit reductions applied 
            to non-basic-aid districts.

          29)Scores $12.133 million of 2011-12 Special Education funding 
            toward satisfaction of the state's 2008-09 federal 
            'maintenance of effort' requirement.  

          30)Authorizes a statutory appropriation for the K-3 Class Size 
            Reduction Program for 2012-13.  The statute authorizes the 
            Superintendent of Public Instruction to certify the funding 
            needed for the program in 2012-13 to ensure full funding for 
            the program.  This action is consistent with action taken in 
            the 2010-11 and 2011-12 Budget Acts.

          31)Suspends, thru December 31, 2014, provisions of current law 
            that authorize school districts to levy level 3 developer fees 
            if the State Allocation Board is no longer approving 
            apportionments for new construction due to a lack of funds 
            available for that purpose. 

           Higher Education
                
          32)Provides that, effective the 2013-14 award year, the maximum 
            tuition award amounts for Cal Grant A and B awards for new 
            recipients attending private for-profit postsecondary 
            educational institutions shall be reduced to $4,000 from 
            $9,708. 

          33)Provides that, effective the 2013-14 award year, the maximum 
            tuition award for Cal Grant A and B awards for new recipients 
            attending private nonprofit postsecondary educational 
            institutions shall be reduced to $9,084 from $9,708.  New 
            recipients attending private for-profit postsecondary 
            educational institutions that are accredited by the Western 








                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  6


            Association of Schools and Colleges, as of July 1, 2012, shall 
            have the same maximum award amounts as set forth in this 
            section.

          34)Provides that, effective the 2014-15 award year and each 
            award year thereafter, the maximum tuition award for Cal Grant 
            A and B awards for new recipients attending private nonprofit 
            postsecondary educational institutions shall be reduced to 
            $8,056 from $9,084.  New recipients attending private 
            for-profit postsecondary educational institutions that are 
            accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 
            as of July 1, 2012, shall have the same maximum award amounts 
            as set forth in this section. 

          35)Provides that maximum renewal award level for students at 
            nonpublic institutions who receive initial awards in 2013-14 
            or thereafter will be no greater than the maximum award amount 
            effective in the year the student received an initial award. 

          36)Requires all institutions of higher education, with more than 
            40% undergraduate students borrowing federal student loans, to 
            maintain their federal Three-Year Cohort Default Rate below 
            15.5%, in order to continue meeting eligibility to participate 
            in the Cal Grant Program for initial and renewal awards.  For 
            2012-13, renewal maximum Cal Grant awards at institutions with 
            three-year cohort default rates above 15.5% shall be reduced 
            by 20%.

          37)Requires all institutions of higher education, with more than 
            40% undergraduate students borrowing federal student loans, to 
            maintain a 30% minimum six year graduation rate requirement 
            for four year programs (three year rate for two year 
            programs), as reported by the United States Department of 
            Education, in order to continue meeting eligibility to 
            participate in the Cal Grant Program for initial and renewal 
            awards.  For 2012-13, renewal maximum Cal Grant awards at 
            institutions with graduation rates below 30% shall be reduced 
            by 20%. 

          38)Effective 2013-14, eliminates renewal Cal Grant awards at 
            ineligible institutions.  Recipients are still allowed to 
            transfer to another eligible institution and continue to 
            receive their Cal Grant awards.









                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  7


          39)Requires the California Student Aid Commission to notify 
            initial and renewal Cal Grant recipients seeking to attend, or 
            attending, an institution that is ineligible for initial and 
            renewal Cal Grant awards that the students' Cal Grant award 
            will be reduced by 20%, or eliminated, as appropriate, if the 
            student attends the ineligible institution.

          40)Clarifies that co-eligible students can switch from Cal Grant 
            B awards to Cal Grant A awards if they meet all eligibility 
            requirements for Cal Grant A awards upon renewal.

          41)Codifies a requirement that recipients of Cal Grant transfer 
            entitlement awards must enter a university within one year of 
            attending a community college.  Allows the 2011-12 student 
            cohort an additional year of award eligibility.

          42)Reverts $63.1 million to the GF, funding previously set aside 
            for the Governor's Scholarship Program.  These are unused 
            funds from scholarship grants provided to high school students 
            for performance on standardized tests in 2000 through 2002.  
            The grant program was repealed in 2003; recipients have access 
            to disbursement through age 30, after which time their funds 
            revert to the state GF.  This provision results in $20 million 
            remaining in the reserve to assure funding for participants 
            thereby ensuring the state continues to honor program 
            obligations for tests taken in 2000-2002.

          43)Increases the neighboring state student enrollment fee by 
            using a multiple of two from the current level of $46 per unit 
            beginning in the summer of 2012, and uses a multiple of three 
            of the level of resident fees charged beginning in the summer 
            of 2013. 

          44)Authorizes trigger reductions of approximately $550 million 
            for the community colleges (out of a total of $5.4 billion in 
            Proposition 98 reductions) in the event that the Schools and 
            Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012 is not approved by 
            voters at the November 6, 2012, general election. 

          45)Increases by $159.9 million the funding appropriated to the 
            CCC to pay down existing apportionment deferrals.  This 
            reduces the state's deferred payments to college districts 
            from $961 million to $801 million in 2012-13; contingent on 
            the passage of the Schools and Local Public Safety Protection 








                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  8


            Act of 2012.

          46)Creates a block grant structure to support all the active 
            community college mandates.  A college district may receive 
            funds for the performance of mandated activities either 
            through the block grant process or the current claiming 
            reimbursement process.  

          47)Appropriates an augmentation of $516.8 million to the CCC 
            apportionment, only if the Schools and Local Public Safety 
            Protection Act of 2012 is not approved by voters. 

          48)Reduces the GF appropriation for CCC apportionments by $116 
            million in the current year in anticipation of the receipt of 
            a like amount of local property tax revenues from recently 
            dissolved redevelopment agencies (RDAs).  Approves a GF 
            backfill to the extent this level of property tax revenues 
            fails to materialize in the current fiscal year.  The Director 
            of Finance shall notify the chairperson of the Joint 
            Legislative Budget Committee of the necessity to release these 
            funds. 

          49)Approves a GF backfill to the extent that a total of $341 
            million in local property tax revenues from recently dissolved 
            redevelopment agencies do not materialize.  The Director of 
            Finance shall notify the chairperson of the Joint Legislative 
            Budget Committee of the necessity to release these funds.

          50)Allows the Chancellor of the CCC, as approved by the 
            Department of Finance, to reduce community college district 
            base workload measures to match available apportionment 
            funding, only if the Schools and Local Public Safety 
            Protection Act of 2012 is not approved by voters.

          51)Authorizes $50 million to be used for the purposes of 
            providing growth funding to community college districts, 
            contingent on the passage of the Schools and Local Public 
            Safety Protection Act of 2012.

           Child Care Developmental Services
                
          52)Aligns state preschool eligibility to new kindergarten cutoff 
            dates.  Specifically, defines that state preschool programs 
            are designed to facilitate the transition to kindergarten for 








                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  9


            three- and four-year olds children who have their 3rd or 4th 
            birthday, respectively, on or before November  of the 2012-13 
            fiscal year, October 1 of the 2013-14 fiscal year, and 
            September 1 of the 2014-15 fiscal year and each fiscal year 
            thereafter. 

          53)Clarifies distinction between part-day preschool slots 
            (funded with Proposition 98) and supplemental wraparound care 
            for preschool-age children from families who need full-day 
            care (funded with the GF-supported General Child Care 
            program).

          54)Requires the Superintendent to encourage state preschool 
            program applicants or contracting agencies to offer full-day 
            services through a combination of part-day preschool slots and 
            wraparound general child care and development services. 

          55)Requires fees to be assessed and collected for families with 
            children in part-day preschool programs, family receiving 
            wraparound child care services, or both. 

          56)Repeals specified components of the Pre-Kindergarten Family 
            Literacy Program and combines these provisions into the state 
            preschool program, for preschool classrooms that apply for and 
            receive a family literacy supplemental grant.

          57)Reduces funding for the General Child Care Program, the 
            Migrant Day Care Program, the Alternative Payment Program, the 
            California Work Opportunities and Responsibilities to Kids 
            (CalWORKs) Stage 3 Program, and the Allowances for Handicapped 
            Program by 8.7%, effective July 1, 2012. 

          58)Extends authorization for the City and County of San 
            Francisco to implement an individualized county child care 
            subsidy plan until July 1, 2014, (currently scheduled to 
            expire July 2013).  Requires the city and county to phase out 
            the plan and implement the state's requirements for child care 
            subsidies as of July 1, 2016.  A final report shall be 
            submitted by the city and county on or before June 30, 2014. 

          59)Codifies in statute that the maximum allowable family income 
            to receive subsidized child care and development services is 
            70% of the State Median Income (SMI). 









                                                                  SB 1016
                                                                  Page  10


          60)Provides that, effective for fiscal year 2012-13, the family 
            fee schedule for child care and development services that was 
            in effect for the 2011-12 fiscal year shall remain in effect, 
            and continues existing policy that the family fees cannot 
            exceed 10% of the family's total income.

          61)Suspends the cost-of-living adjustment for child care and 
            development programs for fiscal years 2012-13, 2014-15, and 
            2014-15. 

          62)Allows the Department of Education to implement the changes 
            to child care authorized in this bill through management 
            bulletins and similar instructions.  Specifies that the child 
            care changes in this bill are not subject to appeal by the 
            agencies holding child care contracts.

          63)Contains an Appropriation allowing this bill to take effect 
            immediately upon enactment.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Misty Feusahrens and Sara Bachez / 
          BUDGET / (916) 319-2099 


                                                                FN: 0004201