BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1058 (Lieu)
          As Amended  May 1, 2012
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :31-5  
           
           BANKING & FINANCE   8-2         JUDICIARY           8-2         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Eng, Achadjian, Fletcher, |Ayes:|Feuer, Atkins, Dickinson, |
          |     |Gatto, Roger Hern�ndez,   |     |Gorell, Huber, Monning,   |
          |     |Lara, Perea, Torres       |     |Wieckowski,               |
          |     |                          |     |Bonnie Lowenthal          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Morrell           |Nays:|Wagner, Jones             |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           -------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Blumenfield,       |
          |     |Bradford, Charles         |
          |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |
          |     |Fuentes, Hall, Hill,      |
          |     |Cedillo, Mitchell,        |
          |     |Solorio                   |
          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |
          |     |Nielsen, Norby, Wagner    |
          |     |                          |
           -------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Revises and recasts the provisions governing 
          administration of the Victims of Corporate Fraud Compensation Fund 
          (the Fund) by the Secretary of State (SOS), by codifying certain 
          existing regulations promulgated by the SOS to administer the 
          Fund, codifying changes to other existing regulations promulgated 
          by the SOS, and adding new statutory language to facilitate the 
          approval of valid claims from the Fund.  Specifically,  this bill  :  
           

          1)Reestablishes the Fund and codifies statutory requirements for 








                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  2


            both the administration of the Fund and for the eligibility of 
            victims to receive compensation from the Fund, under a new 
            Chapter 22.5 (commencing with Section 2280) of Division 1 of 
            Title 1 of the Corporations Code. 

          2)Provides that an aggrieved person who obtains a final judgment 
            in a court of competent jurisdiction, as specified, against a 
            corporation for fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit, made with 
            the intent to defraud, and who diligently attempted to recover 
            the judgment from the corporation, may file an application with 
            the SOS for payment from the Fund for the amount unpaid on the 
            judgment, as specified. 

          3)Increases the maximum amount that any one claimant could recover 
            for any single judgment that otherwise meets the requirements 
            for compensation from the Fund, from $20,000 to $50,000.

          4)Provides various definitions for the purposes of the Fund, 
            including, among other things that: 

             a)   "Claimant" means an aggrieved person who resides in the 
               state at the time of the fraud and who submits an application 
               pursuant to this chapter;               

             b)   "Corporation" means a domestic corporation, as defined, or 
               a foreign corporation that is qualified to transact business 
               in California, as specified;

             c)   "Court of competent jurisdiction" is a superior court of 
               any state, or a United States district court or U.S. 
               bankruptcy court; and,

             d)   "Final judgment" is a judgment, arbitration award, or 
               criminal restitution order for which appeals have been 
               exhausted or for which the period for appeal has expired, 
               enforcement of which is not barred by the order of any court 
               or by any statutory provision, which has not been nullified 
               or rendered void by any court order or statutory provision, 
               or for which the claimant has not otherwise been fully 
               reimbursed.   

          5)Specifies the information and documentation required to be 
            provided in an application, and allows for other relevant 
            documents as appropriate, including, among other things:








                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  3



             a)   The claimant must provide the SOS with a copy of the final 
               judgment, underlying civil complaint and any amendments 
               thereto, for a finding of fraud, misrepresentation, or 
               deceit, made with the intent to defraud, and may also provide 
               other relevant documentation; and, 

             b)   The claimant must provide the SOS with a description of 
               searches and inquiries conducted by or on behalf of the 
               claimant with respect to the corporation's assets liable to 
               be sold or applied to satisfaction of the judgment, except 
               that a court's determination or finding of the corporation's 
               insolvency or lack of assets to pay the claimant shall be 
               deemed to satisfy this requirement. 

          6)Requires the claimant to make specific declarations, including 
            among other things, that he or she: 

             a)   Is not a spouse or an immediate family member of an 
               employee, officer, director, managing agent, or other 
               principal of the corporation nor a personal representative of 
               the spouse or an immediate family member of an employee, 
               officer, director, managing agent, or other principal of the 
               corporation; however, being a spouse or immediate family 
               member does not alone preclude a claimant from receiving an 
               award;

             b)   Has complied with specified requirements; and, 

             c)   Does not have a pending claim and has not collected on the 
               final judgment from any other restitution fund, or if the 
               claimant has a pending claim or has collected from another 
               fund, include a description of the nature of the pending 
               claim and the recovery amounts from any restitution fund.

          7)Provides certain timelines by which the SOS, claimant, and 
            corporation must provide specified responses, including, among 
            other things: 

             a)   The SOS must mail to the claimant an itemized list of 
               deficiencies, if any, of the claimant's application within 21 
               days if for a single claimant, or 40 days for multiple 
               claimants; and, 









                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  4


             b)   The SOS must render a decision on the application within 
               90 calendar days after receiving a completed application. 

          8)Requires the SOS to provide notice, as prescribed by the SOS, to 
            the corporation and claimant with respect to an application 
            made, for specified purposes, including, among other things: 

             a)   If after 30 calendar days the SOS has not received a 
               response to the latest list of deficiencies, the SOS shall 
               notify the claimant that unless the claimant responds to the 
               deficiencies within a specified period of time of not less 
               than 15 calendar days, that the application will be denied; 
               and,

             b)   Upon issuance of a proposed decision to award payment or 
               an offer to compromise, the claimant shall have 60 calendar 
               days from the date of service of the proposed award or offer 
               to compromise to accept the proposed award or offer to 
               compromise, and if the claimant fails to accept the proposed 
               award or offer to compromise within the specified time, the 
               application shall be deemed denied.

          9)Provides that if, at any time, the money deposited in the Fund 
            is insufficient to satisfy any duly authorized award or offer of 
            settlement, the SOS shall, when sufficient money has been 
            deposited in the Fund, satisfy the unpaid awards or offer of 
            settlement, in the order that the awards or offers of settlement 
            were originally filed, plus accumulated interest at the rate set 
            by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on advances made to 
            member banks, not to exceed 2% per year.

          10)Permits a claimant whose application for compensation from the 
            Fund is denied by the SOS to petition a court, as specified, for 
            de novo review of the merits of the application based on the 
            administrative record.  This bill provides that the burden is on 
            the claimant to prove that the cause of action against the 
            corporation was for fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit, if 
            final judgment in the underlying action in favor of the 
            petitioner was by default, stipulation, consent or pursuant to 
            Civil Procedure Code Section 594, or if the action against the 
            corporation was defended by a trustee in bankruptcy.

          11)Makes it unlawful for any person or the agent of any person to 
            file with the SOS any notice, statement, or other document 








                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  5


            required under the provisions of this chapter that is false or 
            untrue or contains any willful, material misstatement of fact, 
            and specifies that such conduct shall constitute a public 
            offense punishable by imprisonment and fine, as specified. 

          12)Permits the SOS to attempt to recover the amount paid to a 
            successful claimant from the corporation and suspend that 
            corporation, as specified, and requires that any sums received 
            by the SOS pursuant to these provisions be deposited in the 
            State Treasury and credited to the Fund.

          13)Requires that the SOS adopt regulations in furtherance of the 
            administration of the Fund.



           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Establishes the Fund within the State Treasury, authorizes the 
            SOS to administer the Fund, and directs the SOS to adopt 
            regulations regarding administration of the Fund and the 
            eligibility of victims to receive compensation from the Fund.  
            Provides that the Fund exists for the sole purpose of providing 
            restitution to the victims of a corporate fraud (Corporations 
            Code (CORP) Section 1502.5).  Regulations promulgated by the SOS 
            to administer the Fund are contained in Title 2, Division 7, 
            Chapter 12, Sections 22500 et seq.

          2)Raises money for the Fund by directing one-half of the $5 
            disclosure fee required to be paid by corporations when they 
            file their annual Statements of Information with the SOS (CORP 
            Sections 1502 and 2117).

          3)Provides for the Real Estate Recovery Program (also known as the 
            Consumer Recovery Program within the Real Estate Fund; Business 
            and Professions Code Section 10470 et seq.), administered by the 
            Department of Real Estate for the purpose of providing a fund of 
            last resort to compensate persons who are defrauded by real 
            estate licensees.   The SOS's Office used the Real Estate 
            Recovery Program rules as a guide, when developing regulations 
            to administer the Fund.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, likely costs for administration of this revised program 








                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  6


          are in the $150,000 range, with costs to be borne by the Business 
          Fees Fund.  Unknown costs to the trial courts because of the 
          potential for additional filings.  Costs could be in the hundreds 
          of thousands of dollars if there were appeals of SOS denials of 
          claims.  This bill creates a new cause of action if the victim's 
          application for restitution is denied by SOS.  SB 1058 also 
          creates a new misdemeanor for anyone to file any required 
          information that is false or untrue.

           COMMENTS  :  This bill is based on an article authored by The 
          Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Morain on October 9, 2011, Fund 
          Victims Fund is a Travesty, profiling the challenges faced by the 
          approximately 500 victims of a corporate fraud perpetrated by 
          James Walker and his now-defunct Senior Care Advocates, Inc.  In 
          his article, Morain detailed the nearly 18-month struggle of 
          victims scammed by James Walker and Senior Care Advocates to 
          obtain compensation from the SOS's Office through the Fund.  

          Subsequent to the Dan Morain article and the correspondence 
          between Mr. Redmond and the SOS, several legislative offices 
          contacted the SOS's office in an attempt to determine whether the 
          case summarized in the Bee article and detailed in the lengthy 
          correspondence between Mr. Redmond and the SOS's office was an 
          aberration, or was, instead, representative of a pattern of 
          over-protectiveness toward the Fund within the SOS's Office.  
          Findings from those inquiries are summarized immediately below.

           How Many Claimants Are Receiving Compensation From the Fund?  
           
          1)When first contacted, the SOS's Office indicated that, from the 
            Fund's inception through August 1, 2011, the SOS had received 
            701 claims for restitution from the Fund.  

             Of these 701 claims, five claims were awarded, one claim was 
             settled during litigation, and one court appeal by a victim 
             resulted in a judgment confirming the SOS's settlement offer.  
             When summed, all seven of these claims resulted in a payout 
             from the Fund of $92,497. 

             Of the remaining claims, 102 did not qualify for payment, 
             because they did not meet the eligibility criteria established 
             by the SOS, 28 claims were withdrawn, three claims were denied, 
             and 561 claims (most related to Senior Care Advocates) were 
             pending resolution.








                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  7



          2)On October 14, 2011, the SOS's office responded to legislative 
            requests for a breakdown of the 102 claims which did not qualify 
            for payment, because they did not meet the eligibility criteria 
            established by the SOS's office in its regulations (a number 
            which grew to 103 by the date of the SOS's response).  The 103 
            claims were rejected for the following reasons:

              --------------------------------------------------------- 
             |                                              |Number of |
             |              Reason for Denial               |Applicatio|
             |                                              |ns Denied |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |The victims applied for compensation based on |          |
             |judgments that were not based on corporate    |    52    |
             |fraud                                         |          |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |A judgment was lacking, or the judgment was   |          |
             |not issued by a court in California           |    23    |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |Applications were based upon judgments        |          |
             |against entities that were not corporations   |    14    |
             |                                              |          |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |Applications were based on judgments that     |    5     |
             |were not final                                |          |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |Applicants demonstrated insufficient proof    |          |
             |regarding their attempts to collect from the  |          |
             |corporation and its corporate officers prior  |    4     |
             |to filing a claim with the Fund               |          |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |Applications were submitted more than 18      |          |
             |months following final judgment               |    3     |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |Applicant was not a party to the court        |    1     |
             |judgment                                      |          |
             |----------------------------------------------+----------|
             |Application was based on a judgment issued    |          |
             |prior to January 1, 2003                      |1         |
             |                                              |          |
              --------------------------------------------------------- 

          3)By March 28, 2012, the SOS's office had resolved a considerable 








                                                                  SB 1058
                                                                  Page  8


            number of its outstanding applications.  

             From the Fund's inception through March 28, 2012, a total of 
             225 claims have been approved or resulted in victims being 
             offered settlements (up from less than ten through August 1, 
             2011), and 25 claims are pending resolution (down from over 550 
             through August 1, 2011).  An additional 27 claims have been 
             deemed complete and are pending a decision.  118 claims have 
             been rejected, because the SOS's office found the victims did 
             not qualify for payment from the Fund (see reasons cited 
             immediately above).  294 claims have been denied, because the 
             applicants could not prove damages.  30 claims have been 
             withdrawn.  

           How Much Money Is In The Fund?   The Fund collects approximately 
          $1.5 million per year, through the $2.50 annual disclosure fee 
          paid by corporations pursuant to the Fund's enabling legislation.  
          At present, the Fund holds approximately $5 million.  Because the 
          Fund went several years without making any significant payments to 
          victims, and thus built up a significant reserve, it was raided in 
          the 2010-11 fiscal year, to help address General Fund shortfalls.  
          The Fund currently has an outstanding $10 million loan to the 
          General Fund, which is required to be repaid, with interest, when 
          it is needed to pay claims out of the Fund.  From the Fund's 
          inception to date, the SOS's office has approved the payout of 
          approximately $2.1 million in compensation to victims (most, as 
          cited above, in the last eight months).  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Mark Farouk / B. & F. / (916) 319-3081 


                                                                  FN: 0004964