BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1122
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1122 (Rubio)
          As Amended  June 28, 2012
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :38-0  
           
           UTILITIES & COMMERCE               13-0             NATURAL 
          RESOURCES                9-0    
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Bradford, Fletcher,       |Ayes:|Chesbro, Knight,          |
          |     |Buchanan, Fong, Fuentes,  |     |Brownley, Dickinson,      |
          |     |Gorell, Roger Hern�ndez,  |     |Grove, Halderman,         |
          |     |Huffman, Ma, Nestande,    |     |Huffman, Monning, Skinner |
          |     |Skinner, Swanson, Valadao |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Blumenfield,       |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford, Charles         |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |     |                          |
          |     |Fuentes, Hall, Hill,      |     |                          |
          |     |Cedillo, Mitchell,        |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :   Requires statewide procurement of up to 250 megawatts 
          (MW) of renewable energy from small biomass or biogas 
          technologies that utilize low emission technologies.  
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Requires the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC), by 
            June 1, 2013, to allocate 250 MW of biomass/biogas procurement 
            by the state's three major investor owned utilities (IOUs).

          2)Limits each project to no larger than 5 MW.

          3)Allocates procurement by technology as follows:









                                                                  SB 1122
                                                                  Page  2


             a)   Dairy digester gas, 85 MW;

             b)   Biogas from wastewater treatment, 50 MW;

             c)   Agricultural biomass and biogas, 50 MW;

             d)   Biomass using byproducts of sustainable forest 
               management, 30 MW; and,

             e)   Landfill gas and organic waste diversion, 35 MW.

          1)Strongly encourages Public Owned Utilities (POUs) to consider 
            and adopt, if appropriate, a procurement target for small and 
            community-scale biomass and biogas projects.
           


          COMMENTS  :   

           Author's statement  .  This bill establishes a statewide 
          procurement requirement of 250 MW from small (less than 5 MW) 
          renewable biomass or biogas projects that utilize low-emission 
          technologies from landfills and organic waste diversion 
          facilities, waste water treatment plants, food and agricultural 
          processing facilities, animal waste facilities, and farms.  It 
          requires PUC to allocate the 250 MW among the state's three 
          major IOUs.  PUC's Decision revising the Feed-in Tariff Program 
          ignores market considerations for small renewable biomass or 
          biogas projects and fails to promote diversity in resource 
          technologies. Without differentiating small renewable biomass 
          and biogas projects from other renewable distributed generation 
          technologies, opportunities for methane pollution reduction and 
          clean energy generation will not be realized.  Unless and until 
          PUC accounts for benefits to ratepayers and the environment from 
          reducing air pollution and global warming emissions by 
          generating electricity from small renewable biomass and biogas, 
          a separate procurement requirement for these technologies is 
          necessary. 

           What is a Feed-in-Tariff (FIT)  ?  A FIT should be a simplified 
          contracting mechanism for small renewable generators to sell 
          power to a utility at predefined terms and conditions, without 
          contract negotiations.  For IOUs, FIT operates as a "must-take" 
          contract in its portfolio.  If the participant generates the 








                                                                  SB 1122
                                                                  Page  3


          power, IOU must take it and pay for generation from the facility 
          according to the terms of FIT contract.

           Federal law regulates wholesale electricity rates  .  The Federal 
          Power Act grants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 
          jurisdiction over wholesale electric sales in interstate 
          commerce, including sales made entirely intrastate and sales 
          delivered locally to a distribution system.  In FERC's ruling 
          found, among other things that the PUC "may take into account 
          obligations imposed by the state that, for example, utilities 
          purchase energy from particular sources of energy or for a long 
          duration." (FERC Order 133 FERC Section 61,059, October 21, 
          2010, Ordering Paragraph 26).

           FIT procurement contracts  .  Prior legislation (AB 1969 (Yee), 
          Chapter 731, Statues of 2006) provided a small renewable 
          generator FITs in the territories of the three largest IOUs and 
          provide a 10, 15, or 20-year fixed-price, non-negotiable 
          contract for systems sized up to 1.5 MW.  PUC has a rulemaking 
          open to implement the terms of SB 32 (Negrete McLeod), Chapter 
          328, Statutes of 2009, and expand IOU FIT to 3 MWs.  The total 
          program allocation between the three IOUs is approximately 500 
          MWs.

          On May 24, 2012, PUC approved a Decision on the SB 32 FIT which 
          provide price adjustments and separates FIT into three product 
          types: as available, peaking, and non-peaking as available.  
          Stakeholders in PUC proceeding requested a set-aside for 
          specific technologies, particularly biogas.  PUC declined to 
          adopt a technology specific set-aside because the Legislature 
          did not did not provide statutory direction to do so.  However, 
          the three categories established in PUC do recognize the 
          attributes of the technologies via the three categories of 
          procurement.  Solar is generally a peaking technology, wind is 
          generally an as available technology, and biogas/biomass are 
          generally as available technologies.

          If enacted, the 250 MW authorized by SB 1122 would be in 
          addition to those MW authorized pursuant to SB 32 and would be 
          limited to biogas and biomass technologies.

           Carve out for bioenergy  ?  Opponents to this bill oppose a carve 
          out for bioenergy because they prevent fair competition among 
          renewable energy technologies. Supporter point out that 








                                                                  SB 1122
                                                                  Page  4


          bioenergy provides baseload renewable energy and that the 
          program is small and will not impose undue costs on ratepayers.  
          PUC's report on California's Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) 
          shows that there is significant growth in contracts with solar 
          photovoltaic and wind technologies while biogas is at best, 
          tepid growth.  Baseload technologies can address issues with 
          intermittency that have been raised about wind (only generates 
          when the wind is blowing) and solar (only generates when the sun 
          shines).

          Bioenergy fuels, particularly biogas, can provide a range of 
          energy services, not limited to generation. Biogas can also be 
          used to power natural gas vehicles and new efforts are underway 
          to provide conditioning that will allow biogas to be safely 
          injected into natural gas pipelines.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Susan Kateley / U. & C. / (916) 
          319-2083 




                                                                FN: 0005010